I used to spend much of my free time obsessed with theoretical physics.
At some point, maybe 10 or 15 years ago, my obsession switched to freedom tech.
I’m hoping one day to shift my focus back to physics. In some sense, my desire to figure out decentralized WoT is motivated in part by a desire to answer the deeper questions. To do that, we need to replace the legacy peer review process with something better.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I thought about taking TeXstr in that direction, using WoT as a decentralized peer-review mechanism and Atomic Signature Swaps to offer bounties to reputable people to review your work. I could for example lock 10k usd that only Ed Witten could claim in exchange for his signature to an event announcing the work has merit. He could filter what he reviews by value and stop reading as soon as he realizes it won't deserve his social signal, cutting his losses in time investment really quickly. He has an even greater incentive to stay honest, as his reputation and future earning (inside and outside of nostr) is worth much more than any single bounty.