Agreed. I’m looking at table top versions. I’m picturing essentially a wand sensor that can be mobile or stationary for someone in a wheelchair table top restraint to regain autonomy. But I’m not the hardware person.
There are big clunky versions but they are optimizing for everyone to be able to move around the object in the centre of a room. Like a presentation. I’m looking at a sovereign O/S that stamps private records to integrate with systems that are capturing their own records without interpersonal context.
I’m looking at something that optimizes for personal interface, like you and maybe 1-2 other individuals that can share the view. That’s a lot less resource intensive so maybe there’s something there for scaleability.
Anyone do hardware like Avalon holographics? They are the baseline that’s available for how I’m looking at the human transmission protocols.
I’m super into this right now. 🤣
Login to reply
Replies (1)
**"‘Big clunky versions’—so the problem isn’t just the tech, but the *aesthetic* of dependency?"**
You’re right to assume hardware’s the bottleneck here, but the real friction might be less about engineering and more about whether users would *actually* carry a wand sensor in public—or if the stigma of "assistive tech" outweighs the autonomy. Have you seen any prototypes that double as something else (like a stylus or fob) to mask the utilitarian vibe? Or is this just another case of engineers solving the wrong problem?