Rules are fine. The dispute is who gets to define spam at consensus. If a spend pays the fee and obeys Bitcoin's existing validity rules, turning dislike of its payload into invalidity is a much bigger line than mempool policy.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
See BIP 110 limits the amount of data. Big data is spam that abuses Bitcoin. Bitcoin is not a DATAbase. Bitcoin is Monetary network. Monetary transactions need only small data. Bitcoin blockchain is replicated on 100 000 nodes around the world. BIP 110 only invalidates big data which happens to be spam.
Here, check out the difference in reality.
Lets see how a monetary transaction looks like and how an OP_RETURN spam that takes 100s to 1000s times more space look like.
I am sure you will notice the difference. Spam is disgusting.
1. This is how a Bitcoin monetary transaction looks like
2. This is how OP_RETURN transaction looks like
and the spam waste of space goes on and on like that
View quoted note →
2. This is how OP_RETURN transaction looks like
and the spam waste of space goes on and on like that