So you're going to make the argument lightning is not a centralizing force? Of course it is... The bigger the node, the better the node, big nodes grow capital faster than small nodes. Like a flywheel to funnel capital into bigger and bigger nodes. The network grows overall but lightning nodes will continue to experience wealth inequality as time goes on.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Lightning is just reusable on-chain transactions, that's as decentralized as Bitcoin is. A family or business only needs a channel or two. It doesn't require excess capital, it only requires you make a transaction you would have anyway.
Making nodes easier to run is the lowest hanging fruit, that's what Pub does. Making them easier to access is what CLINK does.
Lightning is Bitcoin, dissatisfaction with Lightning is dissatisfaction with Bitcoin itself. One is emergent of the constraints of the other. There's no new levers to pull, just trust and centralization.