Tbh the core problem with Dawah Inc isn’t “toxicity” in the abstract. Yes polemics existed long before algorithms but the real issue is that modern dawah content is structurally shaped by the attention economy. It is engineered to be bite sized, emotionally spiking, endlessly consumable, not to actually form people to be better Muslims. The incentive isn't geared toward truth or transformation, but clicks, outrage, retention, monetization. That’s why you get endless reminders, recycled controversies, and low signal slop debates. Not because Muslims are uniquely bad obviously, but because the zionist owned platform rewards that behavior. Dawah becomes content, content becomes product, Muslims become traffic. Whether the topic is Islam or sports doesn’t matter.. Everything is flattened. Yes Nostr doesn’t magically make people sincere, but it removes the machine that manufactures that insincerity. There is no central algorithm that's optimizing for outrage, no external actor tuning incentives or deciding what must go viral. Content exists because users publish it and other users choose to engage with it and zap it, not because a platform needs engagement metrics to sell ads. To me that changes the entire dynamic. Slower long form nonperformative discourse can exist without being punished. 8 hr debates don’t thrive here not because they’re censored, but because real users (you and me) set the tone and pace instead of an algorithm trained to maximize agitation. We're building a space where dawah isn’t structurally coerced into becoming noise. Legacy social media will continue doing what they’re designed to do. Nostr simply allows a parallel space where the incentives are different. That’s the starting point.