Replies (11)

u32Luke's avatar
u32Luke 4 months ago
u32Luke's avatar
u32Luke 4 months ago
Exit, loyalty, and voice is another good read
JackTheMimic's avatar
JackTheMimic 4 months ago
I would say PPLNS but the TIDES version. Seem the fairest but also, with low hash is a rough initialization period. Tides is Pool agnostic only that shares have high resolution (are kept in order) and payment splits are non-custodial. Everything else is adjustable.
JackTheMimic's avatar
JackTheMimic 4 months ago
I guess the difference is that the SLICE designation is PPLNS but the N shares is a template determined algorithm? Either way PPLNS seems the most fair it's just how to determine the "N" of shares that seems to differentiate these versions. Only care that miners: Create their own templates Broadcast their valid blocks not the pool Have access to transparent share accounting system The pool's obligation is: Keep share accounting Rebroadcasting valid blocks found by workers Have several template selections If those criterion are followed, that could be ANY pool.