I don't know about Kepler but wasn't Cavendish the first recorded person to measure gravity? in like the 17th century? but I think that was just that mass generally has gravity, ie distorts spacetime (he didn't call it that of course) not the local gravitational acceleration of the Earth. I think Newton generally measured that. and a bunch of people also at the end of the 17th century refined the actual measurement. (and they also noticed that it was *different* at different elevations, destroying my guys "gravity is an inertial force due to upward acceleration" hypothesis)

Replies (2)

Cavendish rings a bell. And while GR/space-time distortions may work, I don't know more about it than like a single diagram and analogy of marbles on a rubber sheet thing. Certainly they didn't thing about it back then. The classical formula works very well, and I seem to remember Kepler having three laws of motion that were explained by maybe newton using calculus and the one classic gravity formula, but am very very hazy on details and timing