SatsAndSports's avatar
SatsAndSports 4 months ago
Ah yes. That's very slightly different from what I imagined; I didn't see how it can be beneficial to sometimes hide a block. If the selfish mining is successful, other miners will see their returns decrease as their block rewards are 'stolen'. This means they will drop off the network. Therefore, we'll get the 51% attack simply because the selfish miners successfully push the other miners off Does that make sense?

Replies (1)

I don't think it will work in the long run. It's limited periods of time they have a burst of hashrate to do it which is what I think is part of their clever marketing campaign to convince people they're taking over (besides having much less hashrate on average and significantly less than 51%). They can't do it consistently and the larger mining pools can also do it back to them especially during the lulls. But yes, if they could keep it up constantly I think you're right that could be a potential outcome. It gets exponentially better for you the closer you get to 51% iirc All they have achieved so far ironically is decentralizing total network hashrate. They are now another large competitive mining pool among the existing large three. The large red "unknown hash" in that link was previously 1-5% and hardly existed. It's now at ~22%.