Dishonorably breaking Gentlemen’s Agreements ≠ Gentlemen He who dishonorably breaks the 10+ year old Gentlemen’s Agreement on Bitcoin Filter Policy ≠ Gentlemen. Core/Core v.30 ≠ Gentlemen Knots + BIP-110 = Gentlemen Do you see? Run BIP-110!🛡️

"You blind fools! Which is greater: the gold, or the temple that makes the gold sacred?" -Jesus Christ, Matthew 23:17 If too many of us misunderstand the true source of Bitcoin's purchasing power, then we're gonna have a bad time. If you know, you Knots. Run BIP-110!🛡️ Filters up!🛡️

Peter ReTodd & the CoreTodds broke a 10+ year old Gentlemen’s Agreement on policy filters with the development of LibreRelay and weaponizing the Core v.30 reference implementation. Benedict ReTodd Iscariot Run BIP-110 to reaffirm Bitcoin’s Technical and Ethical monetary code.🛡️

Bitcoin History shows that Spam attacks come in waves, lead to a surge in fees, and leave permanent damage on chain + indefinite/possibly permanent damage to the UTXO Set. If Bitcoiners don’t maintain and upgrade our Spam Firewalls, we’re gonna have a bad time. Run BIP-110!🛡️

“But now that you know God, or rather have been known by God, how can you turn back again to those powerless and bankrupt basic principles? Why do you want to become their slaves all over again?” -Galatians 4:9 on Spam Apologists applying bankrupt Fiat principles to Bitcoin.

Core v.30, Jane Street/Fiat Games, Epstein Files, Energy FUD, etc… are all part of a multi-front attack on Bitcoin’s quality, sentiment, and brand/reputation, which hurts adoption and hinders positive sum feedback loops/network effects. Run Knots + BIP-110🛡️ Self-custody BTC.🛡️

Peak Irony is ODELL worried that people on the Anti-Spam/Pro-BIP110 side are going to attack the SpamCoin chain after BIP-110 activates because the SpamCoin chain is clearly vulnerable to attack.🤣🤡 @ODELL If we decreased the attack surface like the Anti-Spam side has been arguing for 3 years, then Bitcoin wouldn’t be as vulnerable to attack. Time to admit you’re wrong, ODELL.

BIP-110 is an upward difficulty adjustment for Spammers and a downward difficulty adjustment for Bitcoin full nodes. If you know, you Knots.🛡️ Run BIP-110!🛡️ Filters up!🛡️

If Bitcoiners implemented large Op_Returns like Vitalik and Ver wanted back in 2014 and 2017, respectively, then Bitcoin would be much weaker than it is today, if it even still existed at all. Reigning in Op_Return, Op_If and other fields with hard limits is the move. Run BIP-110!🛡️

We need to record monetary data in Bitcoin because monetary data is needed to solve the double spending problem. We don’t need to record non-monetary data (Spam) in Bitcoin because Spam isn’t needed to solve the double spending problem. Do you see? Run BIP-110!🛡️✊🏼

DickButts & Spam make it harder/more expensive for Bitcoin and its users to solve the double spending problem. I do knot like DickButts & Spam. I do knot like them, Scam I Am. If you know, you Knots.🛡️ Run BIP-110!🛡️ Filters up!🛡️

BIP-110 gives Bitcoin users 12 months to test drive some defense upgrades to Bitcoin’s Iron Man Suit.🛡️

Look, it’s not like Vitalik was trying to change consensus rules, ok? If we had standardized large Op_Returns on Bitcoin since 2014, it wouldn’t have fundamentally changed Bitcoin.🤡 -ODELL & The Spam Simps probably 0-83b Op_Return range is more than enough. Run BIP-110🛡️

BIP-110 has no consensus because it has no consensus.🤡 Make a real argument. The fact is that BIP-110 adds hard narrow limits on contiguous data that increases friction and cost on Spam Attackers and helps us mitigate risks from spam and poison block attacks. Interesting that ODELL can’t/won’t make a technical argument to counter BIP-110. View quoted note →

Bitcoin Consensus and Schelling Points can happen gradually… … then suddenly. BIP-110 is Bitcoin’s best option to mitigate Spam Attacks. BIP-110 is a Bitcoin users’ Dominant Strategy.🛡️ View quoted note →

Core v.30 is unnecessary and reckless. Fortunately Bitcoin has incredibly passionate users who know that we must always mitigate risks from Spam and DOS attacks when reasonable just like Satoshi and early Bitcoin users did with the Block Size Limit. ODELL is only revealing he has higher priorities than defending Bitcoin’s monetary quality for all of its users. Fade ODELL… study BIP-110, then let’s activate it and rug the ReTodds. View quoted note →

Core v.30 is not about making Bitcoin better Money. Core v.30 is about attacking Bitcoin. Core v.30 is about ego and control for VC funded vultures like ODELL, and for bad actors like Peter Todd and Adam Back, and for the attackers trying to degrade Bitcoin’s quality as Money Spam Mitigation ≠ 100% Spam Prevention ODELL is making the same garbage arguments that Adam “Andy” Back was making for months, which led many of us to suspect Andy was compromised… then months later we find out that Adam/Andy was too closely associated with Jeff Epstein for comfort ODELL is triggering more red flags 🚩🚩🚩 View quoted note →

So BIP-110 gets us a 12 month test drive with 83 byte Op_Return limit, 34 byte script pubkey size limit/Poison Block Defense, further optimizes Taproot for Money, AND Rugs the Spammers for fun? You had me at 83 byte Op_Return limit… Activate Operation BIP-110!🛡️

Let’s get BIP-110 activated on Bitcoin. It will help us mitigate material risk from Op_Return Spam, Op_If Spam, and Poison Block attacks. It’s like taking the Lambo or Ferrari in for recall inspections after engineers noticed some things were off. Knot the most fun, just the right thing to do. Let’s treat Bitcoin with the utmost care and respect.

Tired: Adam Back should resign. Wired: Big Bruv won’t let Adam Back resign because they’re not done weaponizing him yet, so he must be ignored.