Government this, government that.
It's pretty clear that most bitcoins are located in the United States. Owned by the people.
It's really up to the US plebs not to sell to governments that either print their own money, or are bellied up to the money printer.
"it's open source" seems like an easy marketing gimmick.
What are easy heuristics for the layman to determine if the open source thing is actually getting many eyes on it?
Imagine saying the US government should buy XRP ripple tokens with public money.
How does a decentralized and secure protocol interface with the sovereign?
We need boots on the ground. More Bitcoiners having conversations with politicians.
The very existence of a Digital Asset stockpile including other things than Bitcoin is the path we walk to any other digital asset than Bitcoin being thrown in the dust bin of history.
We walk any path, because they lead to the same place.
The term Bitcoiner might sunset from my vocabulary, idk.
Instead I'll just call people I would have called Bitcoiner "curious people".
Bitcoin is not an identity.