"Alchemy is obscure only because it is hidden. The philosophers who wished to transmit to posterity the exposition of their doctrine and the fruit of their labors did not divulge art by presenting it in a common form, so that the profane could not misuse it. Also, it is by its difficulty of comprehension, by the mystery of its enigmas, the opacity of its parables that this science has been relegated among reveries, illusions and chimeras. Admittedly, these old sepia-toned books are not easily understood. To pretend to read them in the same way as normal books would be to mislead ourselves." -Fulcanelli, Dwellings of the Philosophers

“If I told you how I made my discoveries, you would take me for a fool.” -Faraday

🫡🪶 Reveille for Flight Club: View quoted note →

"Philosophers undertook long journeys, with the intention of increasing their baggage of knowledge, or they wrote between them, from country to country, from kingdom to kingdom encrypted messages. The manuscripts of the great Adepts, those of the Panapolitan Zozime, Ostanes, Synesius, were disputed; copies of Geber, Rhazes, Artephius. The books of Morien, of Mary the Prophetess, the fragments of Hermes were negotiated at high prices. The fever seized the intellectuals and, with the fraternities, the lodges, the initiatic centers, the puffers* grew and multiplied." -Fulcanelli, Dwellings of the Philosophers *Puffer is a derogative nickname for a pretended alchemist who is preoccupied with transmuting base metals into gold.

@Ava Yeah, they knew. Episode 21 from Season 2 features a character whose last name is Kaballa. Unfortunately, something that teaches wisdom, understanding, knowledge, power, mercy, beauty, victory, and glory is all too often dismissed by people simply because Kaballah is a word they don't know. View quoted note →

The red herring deflects whereas the thought-terminating cliché shuts down. Each is an aversive technique. Some of these seem like they could qualify as red herrings but most of them are typically said by someone attempting to shut down further discussion. View quoted note →

This is one of the consequences of outsourcing education to politicians and the rest of the vampiric elites. Social engineering is often accomplished via the Hegelian dialectic or other methods of manufacturing consensus. If they can get the masses fired up over some problem, typically a problem they've created, they can predict our response and roll out a Trojan horse of a solution. In general, people are not taught logic, logical fallacies, debate, or argumentation in school. People who are educated in such areas do not fall for the tactics used by hegemons to manufacture consensus amongst the masses. It is logically fallacious to throw the baby out with the bathwater yet that's how most people operate. The key is to be open minded enough to explore everything, but intelligently so. This requires robust discernment which serves a role somewhat similar to a knight's suit of armor. We must be willing to explore, but we must also explore with caution. Truth can come from any source, even if that source has a dismal track record, much less a history of pitching no-hitters every time they communicate. Bitcoin is money. Ruling elites are self-serving. The Earth is spheroidal. Stay open minded but learn how to detect and dodge logical fallacies. 🪶 View quoted note →

I’m glad they mentioned everything they did, especially Star Wars, Indiana Jones, and V for Vendetta. As Evey Hammond’s father is said to have said in that movie, “Artists use lies to tell the truth.” Cinderella, The Greatest American Hero, The Green Lantern, The Matrix…there are so many modern pieces of entertainment that contain valid lessons we are here to learn in Earth school. View quoted note →

Cryptotourists who got propagandized by some mainstream media hype and showed up at the peak of a cycle thinking they’ve found their meal ticket getting dumped on instead: View quoted note →

Starting in 10 minutes. View quoted note →

White to win checkmate in one move.

💯 This is why, as part of our weekly study, we cover one logical fallacy in the Flight Club study group sessions on Sundays. In order to love our neighbors, we must be open-minded and receptive. To be intelligently receptive requires robust discernment. 🪶 View quoted note →

Join us tomorrow, approximately 24 hours from now (12 noon US east coast time), as we continue studying "The Law of One” which is a series of 106 conversations that occurred from 1981-1984 between a physics professor & the entity known as Ra who had previously tried to spread the Law of One in ancient Egypt with mixed results. Last week, we covered: - The logical fallacy known as “Ad Hominem", - The second half (pages 113-116) of chapter 12 from “A Channeling Handbook”, - Session 82 of the Law of One, - Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. This week we plan to cover: - The logical fallacy known as “Circular Reasoning" a.k.a. "Begging the Question", - The first half (pages 117-120) of chapter 13 from “A Channeling Handbook”, - Session 83 of the Law of One, - Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. Link to join the "Flight Club" study group Clubhouse:

Clubhouse

Flight Club

Flight Club is a study group created by Red Tail Hawk to study all religious and esoteric wisdom traditions seeking common ground, truth, and insig...

Link to RSVP for the upcoming study group session: https://www.clubhouse.com/invite/KNpF99ZKD1rjAYJOvJapJWQkVqe4frDrzYw:_oUDwwmG8KkVztJRAgb5vzLf5cI-yr5hQU_iGKl0dvk

The "nanny state" actors do love their Hegelian dialectic. It's simple and effective: problem, reaction, solution. They want to usher in 1984 style panopticon measures but they can't just roll that stuff out without pushback. They must first manufacture consent. This is why the institutional schools typically do not teach discernment in the forms of logic, logical fallacies, argumentation, debate, etc. That would armor the populace with the discernment necessary to see through the logically fallacious tactics used by the nanny state to manufacture consent. They use fear to elicit reactions from the people who then respond in a predictable way. The people clamor for a solution which the nanny state is more than happy to give them. The solution is a Trojan horse: a threat to the people's well being masquerading as a benefit. Covid was a great, recent case study for this kind of social engineering technique. 🪶 View quoted note →

Why do etymologists think that so many words originated from Latin roots? Why did Rome persecute Christians for the first few hundred years before flip flopping to adopt Christianity? Why do all roads lead to Rome? Roman hegemons created the Latin iron curtain of etymology for the same reason they killed off all of the most accurate early Christian preachers and for the same reason they built roads all over: they wanted to sweep away the truth and centralize authority for themselves. Christ traveled during the missing years from the canonical gospels. Note: “canonical” means the same thing as “fiat”. Roman hegemons didn’t want people to follow “the way” which meant abiding the Golden Rule, i.e. loving your neighbors as yourself. To do that requires learning the words and the ways of others, e.g. the Druids, the Egyptians, the Hindus, and the Buddhists. Roads made it easier for Rome to march, conquer, and destroy evidence of Christ’s travels. The Latin iron curtain made it easier for Rome to masquerade as the Walmart of etymology, i.e. “one stop shopping. Rome didn’t adopt Christianity; they hijacked and distorted it.