White to win checkmate in one move.

💯 This is why, as part of our weekly study, we cover one logical fallacy in the Flight Club study group sessions on Sundays. In order to love our neighbors, we must be open-minded and receptive. To be intelligently receptive requires robust discernment. 🪶 View quoted note →

Join us tomorrow, approximately 24 hours from now (12 noon US east coast time), as we continue studying "The Law of One” which is a series of 106 conversations that occurred from 1981-1984 between a physics professor & the entity known as Ra who had previously tried to spread the Law of One in ancient Egypt with mixed results. Last week, we covered: - The logical fallacy known as “Ad Hominem", - The second half (pages 113-116) of chapter 12 from “A Channeling Handbook”, - Session 82 of the Law of One, - Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. This week we plan to cover: - The logical fallacy known as “Circular Reasoning" a.k.a. "Begging the Question", - The first half (pages 117-120) of chapter 13 from “A Channeling Handbook”, - Session 83 of the Law of One, - Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. Link to join the "Flight Club" study group Clubhouse:

Clubhouse

Flight Club

Flight Club is a study group created by Red Tail Hawk to study all religious and esoteric wisdom traditions seeking common ground, truth, and insig...

Link to RSVP for the upcoming study group session:

Clubhouse

2026 Week 6: The Law of One - Clubhouse

Reading/commenting on The Law of One(The Ra Contact) & A Channeling Handbook. Last week: Session 82, 2nd 1/2 of Chap 12 of CH. This week: Session 8...

The "nanny state" actors do love their Hegelian dialectic. It's simple and effective: problem, reaction, solution. They want to usher in 1984 style panopticon measures but they can't just roll that stuff out without pushback. They must first manufacture consent. This is why the institutional schools typically do not teach discernment in the forms of logic, logical fallacies, argumentation, debate, etc. That would armor the populace with the discernment necessary to see through the logically fallacious tactics used by the nanny state to manufacture consent. They use fear to elicit reactions from the people who then respond in a predictable way. The people clamor for a solution which the nanny state is more than happy to give them. The solution is a Trojan horse: a threat to the people's well being masquerading as a benefit. Covid was a great, recent case study for this kind of social engineering technique. 🪶 View quoted note →

Why do etymologists think that so many words originated from Latin roots? Why did Rome persecute Christians for the first few hundred years before flip flopping to adopt Christianity? Why do all roads lead to Rome? Roman hegemons created the Latin iron curtain of etymology for the same reason they killed off all of the most accurate early Christian preachers and for the same reason they built roads all over: they wanted to sweep away the truth and centralize authority for themselves. Christ traveled during the missing years from the canonical gospels. Note: “canonical” means the same thing as “fiat”. Roman hegemons didn’t want people to follow “the way” which meant abiding the Golden Rule, i.e. loving your neighbors as yourself. To do that requires learning the words and the ways of others, e.g. the Druids, the Egyptians, the Hindus, and the Buddhists. Roads made it easier for Rome to march, conquer, and destroy evidence of Christ’s travels. The Latin iron curtain made it easier for Rome to masquerade as the Walmart of etymology, i.e. “one stop shopping. Rome didn’t adopt Christianity; they hijacked and distorted it.

Me reading @Kontext's medium article. View quoted note →

“There’s a lot of stuff we don’t know and we pretend to know.”

Fountain

The Tucker Carlson Show • Giants, Pyramids, the CIA’s Psychic Spies and The Ancient Civilizations More Advanced Than Ours • Listen on Fountain

The people who run countries believe in the supernatural. It’s the main thing they believe in. Why do they try so hard to convince the rest of us...

"The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it." There's a certain frustration that accompanies hodling Bitcoin. You know you have something good and you want for others to experience that good for themselves. It's about a thousand times worse when the good you wish to share is spiritual truth. Comfortable ignorance is unfortunately preferable to learning and growth, even for many Bitcoiners. View quoted note →

That’s exactly what I am doing. I’m aiming at the noble goal of ending religiously motivated violence. I am regarded by skeptics as arrogant, not ambitious, and insane, not intelligent. View quoted note →

Many Bitcoiners realize that Bitcoin will help end war by realigning incentives. This will, in turn, affect the economic calculus of capital allocation. Rather than building drones and bombs, more would-be warring factions will realize the economic folly of that choice and, instead, build power plants that were previously cost-prohibitive, ASICs, and facilities to house and operate them. This will reduce the amount of war that takes place by a significant amount, but it will not end war. Here's why: There are currently bullets and bombs flying about in the name of God. Many of the most extreme religious dogmatists cannot be reasoned with. That's what makes them dogmatists. In order to relegate extreme religious dogmatism to the annals of history, the numbers of each dogmatist camp must be reduced until they are the size of the modern KKK. Nowadays, when the KKK holds a rally, they draw something pathetic like 400 people from a 10 state area. Those are paltry numbers and, as such, they are unable to fundraise to any meaningful degree to affect their hateful and bigoted agenda. If the legacy dogmatist religious camps can be rug-pulled by a scientifically based perspective that acknowledges whatever truths there are to be found within each religion and makes sense of every historical religious tradition, the agnostics, the spiritual but not religious, and the fringe members of the various religions will join together under this banner of unity and truth. As fringe members abandon the legacy dogmatist camps, the legacy dogmatist camps will shrink and have less fundraising power to be misallocated towards war. This scientifically based perspective is like Bitcoin. It is already here; it is just unevenly distributed. If you're serious about ending the era of war on Earth, it will be necessary to end the era of the Tower of Babel in which nobody speaks one another's spiritual language. Loving your neighbors includes speaking their spiritual language and that, like Bitcoin, requires proof of work. Humanity needs missionaries who are polyglots when it comes to spiritual lingo. Such people can speak to anyone from any religious tradition, demonstrate proof of work in conversation, become an ally, and then a translator who can teach people how to unite neighbor with neighbor, fulfilling the Golden Rule found in every tradition. The Golden Rule is about seeing things from the perspective of others and treating them accordingly. Every tradition has a variant of this which tells us at least two things: 1. It's important. 2. Humans suck at putting it into practice. If we were all doing a great job of this, every religious tradition wouldn't need to try to teach it to us as that would be redundant. It's not enough to fix the money if we want to end war. We have to be willing to leave the comfort of our known base camps. We have to be willing to learn the words and the ways of our neighbors. The only holy war is between love and fear. 🪶

Many of the most followed accounts on social media do nothing but shitpost, post quotes, propagate distortions, or engagement farm by knowingly pushing contentious generalizations. "The truth is like poetry and people fucking hate poetry" -Overheard in a D.C. bar and made famous in a cut scene of The Big Short View quoted note →

Starting in 20 minutes View quoted note →