47's avatar
47
ak@rejecttheframe.xyz
npub1xjfd...wuey
47's avatar
47 2 weeks ago
kid back at 6am muay thai only the strong survive gm
47's avatar
47 2 weeks ago
Q: what are the primary tells of emails and articles written by LLMs? A: Here are the primary tells of LLM-written content: Linguistic patterns Hedge stacking — phrases like "it's worth noting that," "it's important to remember," "it's crucial to understand" used constantly Hollow affirmations — opening responses with "Certainly!", "Absolutely!", "Great question!" or ending with "I hope this helps!" Em-dash overuse — the em dash is a particular LLM favorite, often used where a comma or period would do Tricolon obsession — ideas almost always come in threes: "clear, concise, and compelling" Structural tells Aggressive formatting — bullet points and bold headers for content that would flow fine as prose; everything becomes a listicle Perfect symmetry — each section is roughly the same length; each bullet is roughly the same depth; nothing is weighted by actual importance The "sandwich" structure — intro paragraph → bullets → closing paragraph that summarizes the bullets you just read Fake transitions — "Now that we've covered X, let's turn to Y" between every section Conceptual tells Surface comprehensiveness — touches every subtopic but goes shallow on each; optimizes for coverage over insight No real opinions — conclusions are mush ("there are pros and cons to both approaches"); rarely commits to a position Absence of specificity — vague examples ("for instance, a company might...") rather than real, named ones No surprises — the conventional wisdom take, every time; nothing that would make a reader stop and reconsider Voice tells Toneless authority — a weirdly confident, neutral, slightly formal register regardless of subject matter Invented momentum — phrases like "diving into," "let's explore," "unpacking" to simulate enthusiasm Over-explanation of obvious things — defines terms the audience obviously knows; treats the reader as a complete novice by default No personal stakes — the writer has no apparent reason to care about the topic, and it shows The meta-tell The biggest single tell is that LLM writing is optimized to look thorough rather than be thorough. It hits the shape of good writing — organized, complete, balanced — without the substance that comes from someone who actually wrestled with the material. A human expert's writing tends to be uneven: deep where they care, brief where they don't, opinionated in ways that occasionally annoy you.
47's avatar
47 2 weeks ago
comical discourse everywhere