Let's see if people can apply a little common sense here.
NASA says they're using gravity to calculate the trajectory. But when you look at the actual maths, gravity never shows up as an independent variable - it's always numbers based on models - never directly measured!
If gravity is a real INDEPENDENT force, at least one variable in the entire Artemis trajectory computation would be represent gravity itself, but it's always GM and based on other observations:
GM values come from watching satellites orbit
Spherical harmonic corrections come from watching satellites orbit
The equation has mass cancel leaving pure kinematics
The accelerometer never detects the force at any point
The trajectory validation is against ephemerides
They then claim Artemis is moving at 24,500mph, and as passengers people don't feel it at a constant speed. The claim is you would feel only acceleration.
In an eliptical orbit you will slow down and speed up. Kepler's second law. Objects move faster at perigee (closest point) and slower at apogee (furthest point).
Retards will say this is explained by the equivalence principle, where gravitational acceleration is not detectable locally.
In essence, the claim is the force is real but inherently unmeasurable by any instrument ever. At no point does the accelerometer measure anything other than zero. So now you're verging on dark matter bullshit.
In other words, they present an unfalsifiable hypothesis yet again people eat it up like a good goys.

Artemis_II_Trajectory - Obsidian Publish
Artemis II: Spot the Kinematics Artemis II launched 1 April 2026. NASA calls the trajectory a product of "multibody gravitational dynamics", Earth ...
View quoted note →