A politician who pushes through a policy that they know will lead to the deaths of a number of people through different means (suicide, starvation) apparently shouldn't be met with violence because 'thats not how civil society behaves" or something?
Or someone engaging in lawful speech who is unjustly targeted by the law in order to be intimidated into silence, they should just pipe down to avoid drawing too much attention to the thing they are talking about?
When did an eye for an eye become such a taboo? Why do they have a license to indirectly and directly destroy lives, but rightful retaliation is so frowned upon?
