GM nostr. In a perfect 10-minute Bitcoin block, approximately 1.11 x 10^{46} Planck times fit into that duration. The timescale difference between Planck time and a 10-minute block is ~10^{46}. The difference timescale is incomprehensibly large. Bitcoin is a frequency which operates statistically at 1.667 x 10^{-3} hertz. The more you know.

Bitcoin: THE quantum-classical computer already has 180M qubits with zero decoherence in its 16 years of existence. It appears Microsoft’s last announcement was another dud. I’m oh so shocked. Bitcoin is still the only working quantum computer for the last 16 years. Surely physics has nothing to say about consensus. Why can’t bitcoiners see the inherent flaw of centralization in quantum computing? Bitcoin is the language to understand Quantum Mechanics, it’s not the other way around. How do you actually think “nature” maintains the conservation of energy in its transactional nature; surely not a peer to peer energy “cash” system. It’s so obvious. It’s in the literal name “Bit” (0 or 1; qualia) Coin” (stamping of value; quanta). Actually the perfect blend of qualia and quanta; measured in discrete blocks of time. Explain how a UTXO is not the perfect explanation and behavior of what we observe as a quantum bit. Centralized Quantum Computing is all fake complexity and black box calculations for what bitcoin has already made simple and transparent. Quantum computing is about “hand wavey” as the federal reserve centrally planning the economy. Wake up. We’ve all been wrong about Bitcoin.

Bitcoin reveals that physicists must have conviction in god if they want to know the truth. Fiat academia will reject all of it. Satan relies on centralization of both the knowledge and the narrative of quantum mechanics. #GM nostr, all is well.

The absence of conviction starts to rot out all your teeth.

You need to be buttermaxxing anon. View quoted note →

I have so much to say about Bitcoin Physics, but I don’t know how to split my work into digestible sections. The implications are seemingly endless. I’m going to have to break everything into small sections some how. Maybe I just start with consensus around “Block Temperature”?

Fiat goes deeper than just money. Education and academia is entirely proof of stake. View quoted note →

Bump View quoted note →

Bitcoin is stuck in the “it’s a currency, it’s a store of value, it’s money” phase of understanding. It’s quite boring now; there’s little novelty left to be said. This too is temporary and will pass. Energy is fundamental, once the physicists see the bitcoin lens, we will exit this boring phase of bitcoins life. It’s so much deeper; but the fiat lens has held us back from going deeper. The next illusion to break lies in physics and our theories. You don’t actually understand physics without bitcoin, and we don’t actually understand bitcoin without physics. A funny conundrum.

Nostr, I need some help. My home node is not reliable enough for me to finish my paper and research. The hardware is shot. I need to run a full node of bitcoin core on a VM. AI suggested an AWS EC2 T3.small instance (2gb ram), does this seem reasonable? 1TB storage. On the same VM I need to pull pretty simple onchain data like block height, block time, block size, block subsidy, block fees, difficulty, cumulative total supply, UTXO count, ect. into a database in which I can compute additional data like energy per block and cumulative energy per block. Is PostgreSQL the right option for this? Then I just need to build charts/tables from my database to present. I would like for the database and charts to be able to update live as new blocks come in, but it’s not completely necessary. Am I on the right track here? I have very little programming/data experience. It seems like AI can help me get through most of it, but I just want to know if there is an easier or cheaper way? Looking at like $100/month for this setup currently. Ultimately this does not need to be sustained long term, just enough to prove the math, concept and visualize the energy of bitcoin for the1st time. The ended game is obviously for block explorers to integrate this; I’m not looking to recreate the wheel. I’ve calculated a ton of early blocks by hand in excel, but I need a program to finish this properly. I really just need block data and not necessarily need a node, but where do you get reliable data from? 🤷‍♂️

Is the Bitcoin Ski Summit happening again this year?? Who thinks we need one for the Ice (East) Coast Plebs?

Bitcoin is a universal language and a lens, to observe, quantify, and communicate the exchanging of universal value between systems; or relationship of energy, information and time. Something from within, which transcends the capabilities of any prior language. Physics plateau’d in its ability to both understand and communicate the relationship of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics into a wholistic system. Satoshi created and quantified timespace, thus revealing its existence. UTXOs are the 1st (and only) FAIR creation and distribution of what scientists call “quantum bits; qubits”, we call this money. Energy is fundamental to a UTXO. It’s a language problem. UTXOs are preserved indefinitely through both space and time because of the energy; decoherence was solved 16 years ago by Satoshi, no one has observed this. Why can’t anyone else see the centralization problem in “Quantum Computing”? There is no second best……