Bitcoin measures the state transition of Boltzmann entropy to Shannon entropy by creating a thermological gate for a chronological state. Bitcoin is measuring the relationship of joules, sats and bits. The relationship of entropy through the conservation of energy and thermodynamics of 2nd law. Of course entropy and gravity are related. This paper is the mirror of Architecture of Time. They need Bitcoin to understand entropy. Boltzmann to Shannon. A measured block of time. They are missing the relationship of area/distance to memory (bits). How do we get these people to look at Bitcoin?

Every bit on the chain is either a debt based bit or a work based bit, both stored as real and distributed physical bits in identical configuration across X based nodes in consensus. Just an objective observation of the physics. We have a positive energy associated (+) with the work based bits and a negative energy associated (-) with the debt based bits. How are they balanced?

What percent of UTXOs are backed by fiat debt (nothing)? How many coins are “owned” only because of debt and the rejection that the work should be done first? Are the excess bits created by inflating blocksize and adding arbitrary Segwit discounting an eternal debt on the network? What about using debt to acquire UTXOs to write bits on nodes? Anyone? Can anyone logically explain proof of work using debt and fiat as the measuring stick?

Reality is the example as to why tail emissions, or demurrage is bad. Reality is defined by finite and bounded mathematical substrate. One must explain Planck Energy and Planck Temperature, Planck Time and Planck Length without reasoning from a finite boundary. Explain constants vs a varying denominator. Explain the conservation of energy without a constant measure. Explain the absolute behavior of temperature and its relationship to entropy, energy (joules), information and time. An absolute measure of temperature cannot be rationalized without an invariant denominator. One cannot even assert they are operating from pure principled reason without grounding Bitcoin’s protocol theory in objective physics and conservation law. This isn’t a matter of my opinion. What conservation logically requires trumps any of my opinions.

Bitcoin or BIPcoin?

What is Nakamoto Consensus?

If bits have energy as shown, they have a mass equivalence too. A chain split of call it ~20% of the nodes, or 20% of the bits diverge, we will see 20% of the mass of bitcoin diverge. This means that there are two representations of time/gravity competing for truth. Low temperature (fee) blocks do not add as much work as high fee blocks. Nobody knows the future, but I see almost nobody is thinking this way. Guys there’s a lot of risk here if we misunderstand the physics. I may be completely wrong, but just my perspective. Can anyone else verify?

If all satoshis are backed by provable work to trigger their subsidy and the ownership of a large majority said sats is backed by debt/printed money (no provable work), what should we expect to happen in a world where energy must be conserved? IMO the answer is both NGU and NGD. Hodling both fiat debt and Bitcoin is a double-spend in the eyes of energy.

Since fiat cannot conserve energy, there is zero intelligibility, knowledge or wisdom be found in viewing Bitcoin through the fiat lens of price. There is only deterministic deception. Due to this, I hypothesize that Bitcoin will vibrate directionally between 0/1; $0/$∞ with compression of time between the wavelengths. I don’t mean this in the absolute sense of amplitude, but in the directional sense. The bit always flips, that’s the rule. Change. I expect volatile bit flips in compressed time. This is how superposed chains of memory and potential truths get resolved across all spectrums of reality. Vol is here 🫡

Just hypothesizing/thinking aloud here. It would seem that most of the influencers and minds of the core Bitcoin space are unwilling to look at the phsycis of Bitcoin. They love to talk how it’s backed by energy, but refuse to look at the quantized energy/entropy Bitcoin measures at the quantized block level of time using thermo/physics, despite some of them being physicists (lol). We cannot move forward using fiat for reference. *If* the core chain is truly captured as many of the BIP110 people claim, we should expect to see quantum sigs role into Bitcoin very soon as the AI attacks continue to breach low entropy memory and the narrative ramps up. Personally, CC breach was the signpost of “Q-Day” in my eyes, but AoT release was the real one. A URSF for quantum sigs feels like a low probability feat now. One more large breach and the fear could consume the network. On the flip side of the physics, a proof of work change is non-negotiable. AoT logically points to safety by defining entropy logically in the Bitcoin Lens; no quantum threat, AI mitigated via knowledge of entropy in both bits and joules. Bitcoin is the measurement, and you cannot have an invariant objective measure by arbitrarily redefining the work, the constants and their temporal relationships wrt supply and emergent user behavior. A standard is a standard for a logical reason. It’s like changing the meaning of 1’ and expecting to remain in consensus with all people who used 1’ before the change. IMO, best to hibernate for the 2016 adjustment *if* you believe 110 is the proper chain. The phsycis stands, Bitcoin is and always will be the answer. I am currently doing my own research and experiments to see if an alternative consensus valid path is available. I’ll let you know if I manage to verify a possibility. In the spirit of Satoshi, all work must be verified. There are some parts of my own work/life that need additional verification and attention. Do not let fiat be the number to verify and guide your logic, you might one day find yourself lost as I have. I too bought the lie that debt was good if it meant I “owned” some Bitcoin. Stay safe out there, the energy has forked into 2. Until resolution, expect the unexpected.

Agreement ≠ Consensus

What is the website that shows the version number of bitcoin nodes in the network that are actively running?

Superposed entropy must be understood 👀

To the BIP110ers who are demoralized. A proof of work change is not the answer. That will be the ultimate death by deception. Find another consensus valid path.