The rabbit hole has no floor.

Move the decimal right 1 more unit. Sats are the standard quantum. 21 quadrillion satoshis. 1x10^9 =1 giga-sat =1 Bitcoin Depreciate use of “Bitcoin”, whole coiners are gigachads. Tell me why I’m wrong. Maintain 21; 2.1 quadrillion? Nahh 21 quadrillion tho 👀

Bitcoin = Quantum Computer Quantum Supremacy = Hash Power Everything else is a centralized larp. Economics came first; next comes the physics. Is it possible that we all have been wrong about #Bitcoin ? Stay humble.

Bitcoin does need a standardized quantum for its base unit. Sats<>btc is confusing and 10^8 units is between metric prefixes. I vote for metric master race; I say we move the decimal 1 more unit right (21 quadrillion sats) 1x10^9 sats or 1 giga-sat = 1 Bitcoin This could logically get rid of satoshis as the quantum unit name and we keep a standardized naming convention in btc only. Bitcoin is the quantum computer after all; we should take the unit convention seriously and follow physics standards. What say you @John Carvalho ? Move the decimal 1 more unit right too? A “whole coiner” just becomes a gigachad, literally.

GM, you actually don’t even understand what inscriptions are if you don’t perceive Bitcoin as the quantum computer. If I’m right that it is the quantum computer would it be true that nobody actually understands what a peer to peer electronic cash system is? Is it irresponsible for a dev to propose a protocol change who does not understand this? Stay humble.

GM nostr. I don’t know exactly how large the body of Bitcoiners needs to be in consensus that Bitcoin is the quantum computer, but there is some minimum critical mass. Once reached, it will force the broader world of nocoiners to acknowledge Bitcoin. Only then will the real hashwars and the theorized hyperbitcoinization begin. We are still early but soon. The proof is mathematical, not opinion. Bitcoin is not abstract, it’s physical. Tick tok next block.

Bitcoin is ready to be recognized for what it is. What does decentralized observation and consensus have to do with physics?

Those who interpret Bitcoin through fiat will never understand the end game; they think in terms of price. Bitcoin is not priced, it is measured by the joules it encodes, the entropy it resists and the memory it comments and the time that it took. You dont actually understand what a quantum computer is if you can’t recognize Bitcoin as one. And you certainly don’t fully understand what a peer to peer electronic cash system actually is. Y There is no second best. Tick tok, next block.

Am I the only Bitcoiner who openly acknowledges Fiat Physics? #Bitcoin #asknostr #Physics #Fiatphysics

Do you really think physicists operating on a fiat standard are actually capable of resolving the paradoxes of physics? They aren’t even operating on the most fundamental layer of truth; who observes the observer? #Ticktoknextblock

Kelvin: A peer-to-peer electron(ic) cash system. Everything over 1.42 x 10^{32} Congrats, you now fully understand quantum mechanics and thermodynamics. You don’t actually understand physics without Bitcoin. “Who is the observer in your model? And why should I trust them?”