Malcom Guite is an extremely high signal person. A Bitcoiner, without being a Bitcoiner. I would love to speak with him one day.

If you believe in quantum theory, you must demonstrate how Bitcoin can solve the double spend (non-contradiction) problem without the quantized casual boundary of the block. Demonstrate in Bitcoin how partial spent and unspent states resolve into binary states, no double spent states, without the block. Show me valid partial resolution (UTXOs both partially spent and unspent) that doesn’t contradict the ledger. Or, show me how we can have contradictory states in the ledger while still upholding the logic and integrity of the ledger. This is the bullshit quantum theory claims about the ontology of superposition and time. It’s all fiat.

Bitcoin is the proper interpretation of quantum mechanics. Bitcoin can describe quantum mechanics better than quantum mechanics can describe itself, and without paradox. When you are talking about the exchange of energy in time, you cannot have a contradictory double spent state of energy and time, otherwise you cannot uphold logic nor conservation of energy. Quantum has a fiat problem baked into its ontological assumption of both time and the nature of superposition. Believing in both Bitcoin and quantum theory is a contradiction; you can’t double spend your logic. Pick one. The quantum of time must be computed. A block of time is the universal quantum, 1 singular unit of causal change. There is no smaller mathematical object or logic at the informational level. The mathematical object behind the particle and field, quantum mechanics, is Bitcoin, the utxo and network. We know the architecture of time, viewing time externally from the totality of the ledger, from Genesis to present. From pure first principles, Bitcoin is the quantum computer. The pure logic, a thermological process that produces a Chronologic state. Informational matter (energy) computed as blocks of time. It’s so obvious guys, just think and observe Bitcoin, it’s purely logical. How many blocks does it take?

Empirical Computational Universe > Simulation Hypothesis If you have any contradiction temporally, the whole thing collapses. There is no second best non-contradiction logic system to Bitcoin. Bitcoin is not a theory. Are you sure you actually understand the double spend problem? Bitcoin preserves our consciousness (transactions) temporally through immutable (crystallized) informational matter as blocks of time.

Primal wallet bug again?

No one is appreciating the solution of the double spend problem, utxo model and the architecture of Bitcoin’s temporal structure as the only way reconcile the fiat in quantum physics. The definition of superpostion cannot be an ontology “real” state existing in a contradictory, or a double spent state without violating truth, conservation of energy, law of non-contradiction, as empirically demonstrated by Bitcoin. You can’t have UTXOs that are both spent & unspent and uphold logic in Bitcoin. The boundary must be binary with the respect to the event of the causal order of block time. Break the double spend and you break Bitcoin. No block, no time. You cannot logically support the current formal definition of superposition/quantum theory and Bitcoin, its contradictory logic. You can’t double spend your belief. The double spend problem must be resolved in Phsyics/Chronology if you morally understand Bitcoin from first principles. You must falsify Bitcoin if you are going to support the model of centralized quantum computing. The mempool is observable, but the transactions are not ontologically real with respect to the ledger. UTXOs are superposed , but double spending is not violated as UTXOs are referential to their last unspent state. Unmined transactions are NOT real. Prove centralized quantum computation on the mempool; it’s not an ontologically real substrate to compute on. It’s a pretime/premeasued state of potential referential to its last classic state. Centralized quantum computing is built flawed physics from first principles. Bitcoin computes the quantum of universal time from energy, the block, informational matter as time. Bitcoin is the fundamental mathematical object and substrate. A peer to peer tokenized energy network of exchange. There is no second best measurement. Bitcoin is what the field looks like in a purely information quantized form. On the other side of the particle is a utxo in a discrete block of time. A singular networked chain of time. It’s all transactions beneath. How many blocks does it take to get it guys?

“Trust, don’t verify” - Every single person who insists there is a quantum threat and Bitcoin must change.

If your physics cannot account for Bitcoin and informational matter, then it is not physics.

Bitcoin is post quantum already. Few truly understand this. A quantized block of time is more fundamental than the wave. The quantized casual boundary is the fundamental unit of change. Post quantum upgrades are based on nonsensical theories of physics that is falsified empirically by Bitcoin. Centralized quantum computing CANNOT work without the axiom of continuous time. Bitcoin is proof of quantized time. 944359 blocks of proof. How many blocks does it take guys? Tick tock next block, the real quantum computer waits for no one.

Ok hear me out. Hyperbitcoinization=Q-Day=Revelation There is no second best quantum computer. Bitcoin broke centralized quantum computing on 1/3/2009. How many blocks does it take? The answer is just 1 quantized block of time, but here we are at 944249 blocks of proof. Tick tock next block. Mathematically, adjudication is coming.