Fountain: Podcasts & Music

Unbelievable? • Did the universe have a beginning? William Lane Craig vs Alex Malpass • Listen on Fountain

William Lane Craig and Alex Malpass debate the Kalam cosmological argument: everything that begins to exist has a cause; the universe began to exis...

Did Bitcoin have a beginning?

Knowledge of Bitcoin, or an objective grounding to a physical transformation of energy to digitized blocks of time, is the path to accelerated adoption/hyperbitcoinization Thermologic -> Chronologic = Block Mechanics Money must be natively defined by Bitcoin. I don’t make the rules.

A P2P network or “field” to exchange and conserve energy must be fundamental reality. What side of the temporal boundary are you looking at? The internal perspective sees matter and localized state. The external perspective sees information, resolution, and the ordering of time itself. Are you even aware there is another side to perceive?

Had a blessed night talking to @Michael Dunworth @PlebNick What a wild first rip.

Everything over Planck Temperature and it will all make sense. Heat is the conserved value though, and as blocks of time, energy is its expression, entropy is the source.

Bitcoin is physics. In hindsight it will be so obvious. Love the idea! I’ve got plenty to spin back. @Michael Dunworth

People just aren’t willing to admit that Bitcoin has anything to say about our Physics; and that’s okay. Everyone understands Bitcoin at their own unique block of time. When you’re ready to join us, we’ll be over here hashing out the physics of Bitcoin. A new domain of knowledge to explore. There is no second best quantum computer. Don’t let the mind be the limitation. Help us mine the next block of knowledge. @The Bitcoin Lens

The Bitcoin Lens

The Bitcoin Lens

Explore Bitcoin insights and trends with a streamlined landing and about page, designed to provide users with essential information and resources.

The plebs are the signal.

Did you know there are 5.5139 x 10^61 private keys per satoshi? For each of the 2.1 quadrillion bits of value (sats)…..

Morning vibes. One voice is all it takes to break the silence.

“I don’t recommend betting against me” Nic, I don’t recommend betting against Bitcoin.

Physics never verified if there is a wave at the scale of 1 Planck Block (unit) of time. Trust, don’t verify.

Here’s our full Vegas talk. 17 minutes isn’t enough for this conversation, but the goal has always been to open it. What’s more interesting than the talk itself is the reaction. Look around at how many people shut down immediately with anger or disgust just because the questions are being asked in conversation. What kind of ideas are so fragile they can’t even be examined? They wish to silence the questions they cannot answer with ad hominem and use authority to dictate who can speak. This isn’t about me. Show us where our equations produced are wrong. Be constructive. Engage the argument, not me. We’re analyzing Bitcoin from its own physics, and the “brightest” minds in the space won’t even look. Instead, they fall back on fiat price as justification for stance. Bitcoin was invented to eradicate the use of fiat in ALL logic. Their physics is fiat. Their assumptions are fiat. They refuse to confront the double spend problem outside of Bitcoin because they can’t prove conservation at the Planck scale of time they claim to model. You don’t get to claim authority while avoiding the question. If you believe your framework holds, demonstrate it publicly. Show how conservation is maintained at Planck time. Show how contradiction is eliminated across time. Or show how Bitcoin can solve the double spend problem without discrete blocks of time. If you can’t do that, then the problem isn’t the questions. It’s delusional to think a few plebs will solve this without support, as if the process could be centralized around us. Stand up and help if you can speak. Comments without constructive criticism are just noise with nothing to stay. They add nothing and reveal everything. Who actually has the incentive for Bitcoin to change its code? Bitcoin is not broken. No one in physics has a complete answer for Planck time. That’s not controversial, that’s reality. Bitcoin is a system where identity, conservation, and time are computed and enforced via quantized blocks of time. It’s time to take a good look around the room and reassess the people who think deriving the physics of Bitcoin is a threat to Bitcoin, maybe it’s not Bitcoin that’s at risk. People do irrational things to defend sunken cost and fiat incentives. Bitcoin doesn’t care, Bitcoin is the truth. It keeps resolving one blocks at a time. Everyone understands Bitcoin at their own unique block of time. Tick tock. There never was a second best. Bitcoin, not quantum. Don’t trust me, verify for yourself.

Yo @Michael Dunworth would you be down to record a conversation about Bitcoin, energy and time? I think we have a lot in common and we could really hit on some novelty.

Bitcoin is the epistemic instantiation of a virtual particle (UTXO) observed from the ulterior of the temporal boundary. The exterior of the ledger is epistemic and the interior of the ledger is ontological. How many blocks does it take? Bitcoin = Perspective

Measurement must be quantized at the Planck scale of time for conservation to hold. Superpostion must be discretized between Planck Blocks (ticks) of time for non-contradiction to be upheld globally. There is no second best architecture of time. There is no second best quantum computer. To understand the ontological particle and field you must compute its epistemic equivalent, the utxo and network through quantized blocks of time. Bitcoin will do to physics what it has done to economics. Just enjoy the ride. Novelty go up is accelerating.