For those who don’t know, an entire geometry section was pulled from the Architecture of Time because we felt it was not necessary for an original release of the paper publicly. I think it’s time to bring informational geometry back in to the discussion, especially when talking about the speed of information (bits per block of time), the “Planck” Length of Bitcoin (maximum length of memory written per block of time), the “Planck” Area of Bitcoin (memory^2) and the relationship between Blocksize and energy/mass. It’s necessary to ground our critique of segwits blocksize increase and the arbitrary pricing of bits. I’m going to have to revisit the archive of papers. For now, here are some old images to get the mind going.

GM; today’s shower thought: What happenes to both energy and mass in E=Mc^2 if you increase the speed of light or the velocity of information by 4x per unit Planck time? You’ve inflation the relationship between energy and mass by16X due to the square. You’ve increased the Planck area (Planck length^2) by 16 fold. This is what SegWit has done to Bitcoin for the last 9 years by allowing blocks to exceed the 1MB consensus rule by up to 4MB while distorting the economics thru discounting. This is NOT the Bitcoin Satoshi gave us. How do we return?

Would you define creation as the conservation of conscious preference and action?

Bitcoin quantizes gravity because Bitcoin quantizes time. Bitcoin quantizes time because Bitcoin quantizes energy through proof of work. Bitcoin quantizes work because Bitcoin quantizes entropy. Thank you Satoshi. Information has a computable energy/mass equivalence. We can now measure the gravity of time 🫡 Bitcoin.