Good morning you Sovereign SOBs #Bitcoin 🍿

Please take this and ask your AI to replace my head with yours and change the slogans to your liking and repost. 21 sats to anyone who does. 1000 sats to the best entry.

Testing the market, would you buy a little Fartface?

Who’s playing Bitcoin?

Sats don’t stack themselves

I used to laugh when my mom said a nickel got her a movie, lunch, and change. Thought it was a cute 1950s fairytale. Then I realized—this isn’t nostalgia. It’s a horror story. Fiat hasn’t stopped bleeding value. #Bitcoin isn’t the rebellion. It’s the escape hatch.

I think the reason Bitcoin made so much sense to me was because of all the stories my mom would tell us that my grandma would give her a nickel to go to the movies and she would have change while she begrudgingly dropped me off at the bowling alley and gave me $5 for 3 games and a hot dog.

I miss when Bitcoiners advocated for acquiring Bitcoin and developing the skill set to hold it yourself.

Be noble

Good morning, Time to get to work

Verdict: Scientifically and economically, the 80-byte limit is a conservative default that preserves Bitcoin’s long-term integrity. While lifting the cap could benefit niche applications, it invites second-order effects (like bloat and centralization pressure) that Bitcoin has wisely tried to avoid. If we’re building for multi-generational sovereignty, Bitcoin should stay lean—and let richer data handling happen in layered, modular ways (e.g. Taproot scripts, RGB, or cross-chain anchoring).