When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

The uncomfortable truth: AI isn't coming — it's here. And it's not replacing "jobs," it's replacing tasks. The people who survive (and thrive) are the ones who can do what AI can't, or who can use AI to 10x what they already do. Why coding + AI literacy matter: 1. Coding is the new literacy. Not everyone needs to be a software engineer, but understanding how things work — APIs, automation, logic — is the difference between being the person who uses tools and the person who gets used by them. 2. AI amplifies skill, it doesn't replace it. A mediocre carpenter with AI is still mediocre. A great carpenter with AI can design, quote, schedule, and deliver faster than a crew of 10 could five years ago. Your edge isn't coding OR your trade — it's coding AND your trade. 3. The earning gap is about to get brutal. Right now, people who can prompt an LLM, automate workflows, or build a simple script are already earning 2-3x more per hour than people doing the same job manually. In 5 years, that gap will be 10x. The choice isn't "learn AI or don't" — it's "learn AI or accept a permanent pay cut." 4. Your competition isn't AI, it's people using AI. If you're a contractor and the guy down the street can bid jobs in 30 seconds using AI-generated quotes and material lists, and you're still doing it in Excel, you're already losing. The market doesn't care about fairness — it cares about speed and cost. 5. You already have the hardest skill: judgment. AI is a tool. It can't decide what's worth building, who to trust, or what makes a project "good." That's still you. But if you don't know how to use the tool, your judgment doesn't matter — someone else will execute faster. Bottom line: Investing time in AI + coding isn't about becoming a techbro. It's about staying employable, competitive, and in control of your income in a world where the baseline just shifted under everyone's feet. The people who ignore this will spend the next decade wondering why they're working harder for less. The people who lean in will spend it wondering why they didn't start sooner. Your move.

If you think Bitcoin is an investment, you already missed the point. It’s insurance against endless debt, central planning, and people who spend money they don’t have in your name. Bitcoin isn’t alpha. It’s the escape hatch.

How about all the lazy fucks who thought they could make a profession out of buying bitcoin with a corporate wrapper because the number was going up😂🤣 You wasted a year of your life that you could have been developing actual skills.

Me waiting for the corporate orange tie shitcoiners to bleed out so we can get back to separating money and state.

AI is more empowering to the individual than #Bitcoin You can get lucky with #Bitcoin and not have done anything hard. A hardworking individual can magnify AI and empower his abilities 100x but he won’t get lucky, he has a narrow window of opportunity and we will need to focus and bear down.

Listen gents, no matter what’s happening out there in the world, in the markets, your entire life and existence lives between your two ears. Everything else is noise. Good morning and have a fine day. I certainly will.

Good morning. What a great day to be alive. You only got so many and you never know when you’re gonna run out. So have fun at whatever you’re doing, take care of your responsibilities and then do things for you.(wifey don’t follow me on NOSTR)

My Clawdbot built me the Home assistant dashboards I always wanted in 10 minutes pretty much first shot. Plus I don’t even need the dashboards any more because I can just tells Sven ( that’s his name) to turn on this open up that, etc. So far thats the only thing I’ve given it access to and I created an allowed list of devices. It’s running in a LXC container.

Good morning, making significant progress on trimming out daughters house.

I had some bad RAM I bought last year, manufacturer is replacing, had to pay up front until I send back the faulty sticks. When is the last time you checked the price of RAM?

Hey guys I wrote this Claude SKILL.md to help any of you navigate the treasury grift. # 🧠 Claude Skill: Proof of People™ ## Skill Name **Proof of People — Bitcoin Treasury Reality Check Engine** ## Category Finance / Economics / Behavioral Delusion Detection ## Summary Analyzes claims made by Bitcoin treasury companies and explains why corporate balance-sheet exposure does not equal Bitcoin adoption, self-sovereignty, or participation in the monetary network. ## What This Skill Does Given a company name and a marketing or investor claim, the skill returns: - A philosophical analysis of Bitcoin’s value origins - An economic breakdown of corporate constraints - A reality-check on the difference between holding BTC and embodying Bitcoin principles ## Inputs | Field | Type | Description | |--------|------|------------| | `company_name` | string | Name of the Bitcoin treasury company | | `claim` | string | Public statement, investor pitch, or tweet | ## Outputs | Field | Type | Description | |--------|------|------------| | `reality_check` | string | Calm, factual explanation of why the claim misunderstands Bitcoin | ## Analytical Framework The skill evaluates claims using three core criteria: ### 1. Sovereignty Test Can the entity: - Self-custody without committees? - Exit the banking system? - Operate without regulatory permission? If no, sovereignty score = 0. ### 2. Incentive Alignment Test Does leadership benefit more from: - Share price volatility - Stock-based compensation - Financial engineering than from long-term network health? If yes, Bitcoin is incidental, not foundational. ### 3. Network Participation Test Does the entity: - Run nodes - Bear personal custody risk - Operate without custodians or merely hold an ETF-like exposure with extra steps? ## Core Principle Bitcoin accrued value because individuals could: - Opt out - Self-custody - Transact without permission - Preserve savings outside political systems Corporations cannot do these things by design. Therefore: > Holding Bitcoin does not make you Bitcoin. > It makes you a regulated entity with a harder reserve asset. ## Common Misclassifications Detected - “Institutional adoption” (actually: balance-sheet hedging) - “Bitcoin aligned company” (actually: stock dilution with branding) - “Proxy for BTC exposure” (actually: leverage with executives in the middle) ## Typical Output Tone - Calm - Polite - Academically disappointed Never hostile. Just devastatingly accurate. ## Use Cases - Investor claim evaluation - Marketing language translation - Twitter argument resolution without yelling - Restoring philosophical clarity after earnings calls ## Disclaimer This skill does not provide financial advice. It provides: - Monetary theory - Incentive analysis - Vibes Side effects may include: - Reduced tolerance for laser-eye PowerPoint decks - Sudden appreciation for self-custody - Involuntary muttering of “that’s not what adoption means” ## Motto **Bitcoin is about removing trusted third parties. Treasury companies are literally trusted third parties with PR teams.**

Time to make the donuts

Fed Saylor’s latest interview into an AI-agent that is a board certified trained psychiatrist. Here is the result. Characterizing Michael Saylor’s responses based on the provided interview transcript reveals a man who is **intensely defensive, intellectually aggressive, and deeply committed to a singular vision**, often at the expense of professional decorum. His frustration appears to stem from a perceived gap between his "first principles" understanding of the world and what he views as the "ignorant" or "myopic" perspectives of the public and the interviewer [1-3]. ### Characterization of Responses Saylor’s responses can be characterized by several recurring patterns: * **Ad Hominem Attacks and Condescension:** Rather than addressing the substance of skeptical questions, Saylor frequently attacks the interviewer's intelligence or motives. He describes the interviewer's questions as **"ignorant," "offensive," "myopic," and "toxic"** [3-6]. He further compares the attention span of those concerned with short-term price action to that of **"sixth graders"** [7]. * **Grandiosity and Historical Parallels:** Saylor frames his corporate strategy not as a financial gamble, but as a historical necessity akin to the adoption of **electricity, radio, or nuclear power** [8-10]. He compares his journey and the commitment required to that of **Gandhi** or the 18 years of education required to be a "competent practitioner" in a field [11, 12]. * **Rigid Binary Thinking:** He presents a worldview where one is either a "serious investor" with a 10-year runway or a "speculator" and "trader" [7, 13, 14]. He dismisses any middle ground, suggesting that criticizing his strategy is equivalent to promoting "donkey carts" over electricity [15]. * **Hypersensitivity to Terminology:** He expresses literal **insult and offense** at being called a "pure play treasury company," viewing it as a denial of his company's "unlimited infinite optionality" to build future products like digital insurance or credit [5, 16]. ### Potential Psychiatric or Personality Insights While a formal diagnosis is impossible without a clinical evaluation, several traits observed in the sources align with specific psychological profiles or psychiatric responses to high-stress environments: * **Grandiosity and Narcissistic Traits:** Saylor’s frequent comparisons of himself and his company to world-changing inventors and historical figures suggest a high level of **grandiosity** [8, 10, 11]. His dismissive attitude toward those who disagree with him—labeling them "ignorant" or "non-constructive"—can be seen as a defense mechanism to maintain a sense of **intellectual superiority** [3, 6, 17]. * **Obsessive-Compulsive Rigidity:** He emphasizes "laser focus" and warns that having more than one idea is a "dilutive distraction" that leads to failure [18-20]. This **extreme rigidity** and rejection of "99 other ideas" suggests a personality that finds security in absolute singular commitment [20, 21]. * **Paranoid Defensiveness:** He views the Bitcoin community as "dysfunctional" and "toxic," claiming they "eat their young" and focus on the 1% they disagree with rather than the 99% of the world he considers the "enemy" [22-24]. This suggests a **persecutory lens** where legitimate market skepticism is reframed as a personal or ideological attack [5, 23]. * **Reaction to Cognitive Dissonance and Stress:** The provided stock chart shows a significant decline in MSTR's value over the year [25]. From a psychiatric perspective, his aggressive frustration may be a **displacement of stress** caused by this 60% drop [26]. When faced with "disappointing" performance, he resorts to **rationalization**, arguing that the "all-time high" is irrelevant compared to "fundamental progression" such as securing insurance or new accounting rules [27-29]. * **Napoleonic Complex/Ego:** Saylor himself admits that "ego" is what destroys companies and empires, yet he simultaneously uses his age (60) and education (MIT) to validate his current authority over younger "30 or 35-year-old" entrepreneurs [20, 30, 31].

And so my day begins…….

Hello World

“For 4,500 years, the Pyramids of Giza have stood because they were built with such immense physical mass that they are "hard to delete." Bitcoin is the first digital structure built with "mathematical mass." By hashing a memorial into Bitcoin, you are "carving" it into a structure that requires more energy to destroy than any empire possesses.” -FF2K 2026 #Bitcoin

Paper fades. Servers fail. People forget. Bitcoin doesn’t. This is what real inheritance looks like. EverstoneBTC ⚡️