Stop acting like a bunch of Wall Street cunts Pony Boy.. Stay Orange #Bitcoin 🍿

Keep it real or people will know you’re a fake.

FYI it’s smart for corporations to buy Bitcoin if their growth potential is low. It’s stupid for the individual to buy such companies. It’s that simple. You buy companies with large profits and or growth potential or you buy Bitcoin yourself.

They say a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Same goes for Bitcoin. The one you custody yourself is worth 2x the one trapped in some corporate treasury or zombie entity. Why? Because self-sovereignty strips out counterparty risk, management fees, and middle-man grift. If you don’t control the keys, you don’t control the bird. So by that logic, “corporate Bitcoin” shouldn’t trade at NAV parity — it should trade at a 0.5 mNAV discount. Half a sat on the dollar. The rise of the individual is simply the market catching up to that math.

What’s a bigger grift, Satoshi Roundtable or The Bitcoin unconference?

If corporate “Bitcoin” dies while real Bitcoin rips, that’s not bearish—that’s the most bullish plot twist of the cycle. Picture headlines calling it The Rise of the Individual. No more zombie treasuries, no more middle-men rent seekers—just people opting out and stacking. That’s the signal, and I’d love to see it.

Every once in a while, it must be said. Just stack sats and STFU #Bitcoin 🍿

I’m convinced most of the Bitcoin treasury influencers have no coins 😂 Because if you have coins, you feel no need to shill dick.

The Pattern Every scam dresses itself in the narrative of the cycle: • 2017 → ICOs (Ethereum mania). • 2021 → DeFi yield (cheap credit, money printing). • 2025 → Treasury shells (corporatization of Bitcoin). • 2026–2027? Likely AI + Bitcoin, synthetic stablecoins, and tokenized wrappers.

I should have been a real writer

The Psyop Nobody Saw Coming When the news broke that Charlie Kirk had been killed, the headlines wrote themselves. Cable news hosts framed it as another casualty of America’s culture war, a right-wing firebrand silenced by his enemies. Online forums erupted: the left finally crossed the line. But one detail nagged at Michael, a retired intelligence analyst who’d seen too many “neat” narratives in his career. He had studied foreign disinformation campaigns during the Cold War and later the War on Terror. To him, the hit on Kirk didn’t look political in the way people assumed. It looked professional. “If you want someone gone, you don’t make it a spectacle,” he muttered, scanning the crime scene reports. “You make it clean. A car crash. A sudden heart attack. This wasn’t just murder. This was theater.” Why Theater Matters Throughout history, public killings have been staged for maximum psychological effect. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914 didn’t just remove a man—it lit the fuse of World War I because of how public and symbolic it was. Similarly, ISIS executed prisoners on camera not just to kill them, but to provoke outrage and manipulate governments into reacting rashly. If Kirk’s death had been quick, quiet, and deniable, the country might have mourned and moved on. Instead, the gruesome display forced people to take sides. It wasn’t just about killing a man—it was about programming a population. Who Benefits? Michael scribbled on a whiteboard like it was 2003 again: • The Left? Unlikely. They gain nothing from martyring Kirk. If anything, his death makes him more powerful. • The Right? Also strange. Why kill your own rising voice unless you need a pretext for a crackdown or unity push? • Foreign entities? Now it got interesting. Kirk was a staunch Trump ally. Weakening Trump by eliminating his surrogates benefits anyone hostile to his return—China, Russia, Iran, take your pick. But again, why so public? Michael circled the last point: manufactured consent. He remembered the Patriot Act after 9/11, and how COVID emergency powers rewrote daily life almost overnight. In both cases, fear and chaos were the accelerants. If a foreign adversary—or even factions within—wanted to nudge America toward more surveillance, more policing, and more division, a high-profile, grotesque assassination was the perfect spark. The Real Game Two days later, social media feeds were overflowing with rage. Protesters filled city streets. The FBI hinted at “domestic terror” suspects. Senators called for emergency security powers. Exactly the kind of reaction Michael feared. He sat back and whispered to himself: “The point was never Charlie Kirk. The point was us. They want us scared, angry, and ready to trade freedom for safety. And we’re walking right into it.” He closed his laptop and stared out the window. He knew the truth: whoever pulled the trigger didn’t just kill a man. They had scripted Act One of something much larger.

The Hidden Grift of Bitcoin Treasury Companies There’s a growing class of companies pitching themselves as “Bitcoin treasuries.” The pitch sounds simple: buy stock in the company, and you indirectly own Bitcoin with the added bonus of potential “yield.” On the surface, it feels like a way to get exposure to Bitcoin while maybe collecting something extra. But if you look under the hood, the math doesn’t add up. The Setup: How the Illusion Works Imagine a company with no profits, only expenses. They hold $1 of Bitcoin and issue one share of stock priced at $2. That stock trades at a premium to the underlying Bitcoin value because of branding, marketing, or just hype. Now the company sells another share for $2, buys $2 more Bitcoin, and now has $3 worth of Bitcoin in the treasury. With two shares outstanding, each shareholder indirectly has a claim on $1.50 of Bitcoin. The first investor is “up” 50 cents, and the second is “down” 50 cents. The company spins this as “Bitcoin yield” — as if they’ve magically increased shareholder value. But in reality, all that happened is one investor subsidized another. That’s not yield; it’s redistribution. Why It’s Unsustainable The grift only works as long as new investors are willing to pay more than $1 for $1 worth of Bitcoin. Once enthusiasm fades or the pool of “greater fools” dries up, the illusion collapses. • Scaling Problem: As the company grows, it needs exponentially more fresh capital to deliver the same “yield” effect. You can’t onboard infinite new investors at a premium. • Operational Drag: Unlike simply holding Bitcoin, these companies have overhead — executives, offices, compliance costs. Every dollar spent on operations is a dollar not going into Bitcoin. That’s a guaranteed bleed on shareholder value. • Market Reality: Eventually, markets notice. If each share only represents $1 of Bitcoin, why keep paying $2 unless you believe in the grift itself? Why Just Holding Bitcoin Wins The beauty of Bitcoin is that it doesn’t need financial engineering. It doesn’t need a marketing team, an executive suite, or a slick yield narrative. It just needs time and security. Every sat you hold is fully yours, unencumbered by someone else’s expenses or need for fresh capital. Over time, Bitcoin’s supply schedule ensures scarcity. The same can’t be said for companies minting endless new shares to fund “yield” illusions. Their model only scales until the next wave of investors stops showing up. The Bottom Line Bitcoin treasury companies selling “yield” are really just running a disguised transfer scheme: new money props up old money. That’s the textbook definition of a Ponzi-like dynamic. It might work in the short run, but it will always fail the long run — no matter how high Bitcoin goes — because you eventually run out of people willing to pay $2 for $1. If you want yield, build a business. If you want Bitcoin exposure, just buy Bitcoin. Everything else is a distraction at best, a grift at worst.

Saylor is selling 50 cents of Bitcoin for 75 cents and you never get to touch it.

The best thing Saylor could do for Bitcoin is run a profitable software company, stack and be an advocate of lowering your time preference and hard work.

IMO if the Bitcoin treasury company idea remains the narrative, the bull market is over and the bear market will be brutal. What we need is a good old fashioned banking crisis or as group of people being locked out of their funds by do-gooders. That would be very bullish for bitcoin.

What’s interesting to me is that node implementations are being lobbied just like normie political agendas. Human nature is human nature

90% of the posts I scroll through, I ask myself, is this guy genuinely retarded? Or trying to make a buck? 90% of the time he is just trying to make a buck.

Starting to have dreams about my dependence and usage of AI, I lose connectivity, and I start to panic, remember when Superman gave up his powers to be with Lois Lane? That’s how I feel about losing AI

I really hope we see the demise of the MSTR moon boys and other Bitcoin treasury influencers sooner than later so we can start to re-embrace proof of work Again.

Legs & Bitcoin: Business Plan 1. Executive Summary Legs & Bitcoin is a hybrid fitness and financial empowerment company that blends hard work in the gym with rewards in Bitcoin (sats). Our ethos: “Nothing good comes easy.” Members earn Bitcoin by showing consistent effort, discipline, and measurable results. With enough dedication, members can offset or even surpass their monthly membership cost through performance-based rewards. ⸻ 2. Mission & Vision • Mission: To create a gym culture that rewards resilience, discipline, and hard work—both physically and financially. • Vision: To become the first global fitness brand that turns sweat equity into digital sovereignty by rewarding gym performance with Bitcoin. ⸻ 3. Value Proposition Unlike traditional gyms that monetize memberships regardless of effort, Legs & Bitcoin flips the model: • Proof-of-Workouts: Track progress, consistency, and milestones via wearable devices and gym check-ins. • Earn Sats: Members earn Bitcoin payouts tied to their effort, milestones, and streaks. • Win Back Membership: Those who grind consistently can recoup their fees, creating a loop of motivation and self-sovereignty. ⸻ 4. Business Model • Revenue Streams: 1. Monthly Membership Fees ($50–$150 tiered). 2. Sponsorships from Bitcoin companies and fitness brands. 3. Branded merchandise (clothing, supplements, gear). 4. Premium coaching and training packages. 5. Bitcoin-powered competitions and events. • Costs: • Gym equipment & leases. • Reward pool (sats allocated monthly). • Technology platform (wearable integration + Bitcoin payouts). • Staff, trainers, and operations. ⸻ 5. Target Market • Primary: Millennials and Gen Z fitness enthusiasts who value Bitcoin and decentralized finance. • Secondary: Athletes, entrepreneurs, and tech-forward professionals looking for motivation and a gym with unique perks. ⸻ 6. Technology & Operations • App Integration: Members track workouts and sync with the gym system. • Bitcoin Rewards Engine: Automatically dispenses sats to users’ Lightning wallets. • Gamification: Leaderboards, streak bonuses, and challenge payouts. • Security: Cold storage reserves, daily Lightning withdrawals, and transparent proof-of-rewards. ⸻ 7. Marketing Strategy • Brand Story: Position Legs & Bitcoin as the place where hustle pays. • Community Building: Bitcoin meetups, gym challenges, seminars. • Social Media: Snarky motivational content, fitness-Bitcoin memes. • Ambassadors: Bitcoin influencers and fitness athletes. ⸻ 8. Growth Strategy • Phase 1: Flagship gym (pilot location). • Phase 2: Expand to major Bitcoin-friendly cities (Miami, Austin, Nashville). • Phase 3: Franchise globally, supported by the Legs & Bitcoin app. • Phase 4: Online coaching + sats rewards system for remote members. ⸻ 9. Financial Outlook • Initial Capital Needs: $1M–$3M (equipment, location, reward pool, app development). • Projected Break-Even: 18–24 months. • ROI Drivers: Membership retention, sponsor partnerships, merchandise margins. ⸻ 10. Ethos & Culture “Nothing Good Comes Easy” isn’t just a tagline—it’s the DNA. Members embrace proof-of-work, sweat equity, and sovereignty. The grind is rewarded not just in muscle, but in Bitcoin.