GM update your knots! View quoted note →

Mine with DATUM This is so fucking sad:

"promoting knots splits the community" good we have to cut out the cancer (this feels like eating beef in-front of a vegan

like it or not, no matter how much facts you spit out. some coretards will never change. way down the line when knots is the biggest. they will claim that bitcoin has been hijacked because we stopped them from hijacking it. no matter the ratio, community will split, coretards will slowly die out, one by one. look at the big blockheads.

work for the crunch of bitcoin View quoted note →

GM. devil is coming. if we lose this, bitcoin will enter to a path that will slowly mutate and destroy it. convince people you orange pilled before to run their own knots. and orange people more people and make them run their own knots, as well.

EVERYTHING IS BROKEN. EVERYTHING IS BUGGY. WHAT IS HAPPPENING TO CODE?

coretards vs knots runner View quoted note →

future mobile nostr client will host your own local relay on your own phone over tor onion addresses which works on any network, even mobile data.

If Ocean hashrate goes up, it is a bullish signal

copyright is finally starting to die, good

knots top 1

"Bitcoin Core is a stinking, corrupt organization that needs to be shattered into a thousand pieces" Matthew Kratter, October 2025.

If every rule in Bitcoin was consensus and we didn't have any policy, then the network wouldn't be as decentralized. Having minimum consensus rules and rest of the things as policy keeps the network fluid and dynamic. This way, every user on the network can decide what their policy rules are and even different implementations can implement different policy rules and such. Which creates a free market of policy rules that can change dynamically, which keeps the network and its rules fluid and adapting. If everything was consensus, then changes would require a fork or a chain split, which is not ideal. It creates problem of the democracies. In a democracy, you have to follow the rules based on what has been decided. Right? So, yes and no can't live together in parallel in democracy. Because democracy works for a single outcome and this is consensus, right? So, different consensus real rules can't exist on the same network, it would split the network, right? But with policy rules, it is a lot more like free markets. So, multiple different policy rules can exist at the same time in the network. Consensus is like written rules, or, let's say, federal rules, right? So, if you are all for the smaller government, you are also for smaller consensus rules. And where everything can complex is community rules, right? So, a community rule is like unwritten rules. What people talk to with each other, like what they gossip about, right? And what they do, how they act, when somebody else does something, right? So these are not written rules. And they can be dynamic, adapting and changing, fluid, right? It has all the advantages of the free markets. And it is beautiful!

Same way changing consensus changes Bitcoin or doing soft or hard fork changes what Bitcoin is. Same way changing policy also changes Bitcoin. So no matter if something is consensus or policy, it is important to be careful while touching them. View quoted note →

Bitcoin is not just consensus, Bitcoin is consensus and policy. And policy is not less important than consensus. It's more beneficial to have some stuff as dynamic instead of static consensus. That's why policy exists. Policy is not consensus, not because they are less important, because it is more advantageous for them to be dynamic and fluid across the network.

how to solve spam? - bring back script size limit policy - bring back old data size limit - filter inscriptions and other parasite protocols as they get popular.

if you are anti spam and. proposing consensus change for it. fuck off

i have a feeling, we have like 1000 fake core nodes. by fake i mean ran by same person on purpose for the stats.