ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ's avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ
me@mleku.dev
npub1fjqq...leku
ʙoarᴅ cerᴛɪꜰɪeᴅ ᴛecʜno-ᴘʜaɢe. mʏ mɪnᴅ ɪs ʜunɢrʏ, anᴅ ꜰeeᴅs on noveʟᴛʏ. ᴅo ʏou ʜave someᴛʜɪnɢ ᴛo sʜare ᴛʜaᴛ ɪ never ʜearᴅ? "𝔅𝔢 𝔠𝔞𝔯𝔢𝔣𝔲𝔩 𝔣𝔬𝔯 𝔫𝔬𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤; 𝔟𝔲𝔱 𝔦𝔫 𝔢𝔳𝔢𝔯𝔶 𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔟𝔶 𝔭𝔯𝔞𝔶𝔢𝔯 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔰𝔲𝔭𝔭𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔬𝔫 𝔴𝔦𝔱𝔥 𝔱𝔥𝔞𝔫𝔨𝔰𝔤𝔦𝔳𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔩𝔢𝔱 𝔶𝔬𝔲𝔯 𝔯𝔢𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔰 𝔟𝔢 𝔨𝔫𝔬𝔴𝔫 𝔲𝔫𝔱𝔬 𝔊𝔬𝔡. 𝔄𝔫𝔡 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔭𝔢𝔞𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔊𝔬𝔡, 𝔴𝔥𝔦𝔠𝔥 𝔭𝔞𝔰𝔰𝔢𝔱𝔥 𝔞𝔩𝔩 𝔲𝔫𝔡𝔢𝔯𝔰𝔱𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔫𝔤, 𝔰𝔥𝔞𝔩𝔩 𝔨𝔢𝔢𝔭 𝔶𝔬𝔲𝔯 𝔥𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔰 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔡𝔰 𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔬𝔲𝔤𝔥 ℭ𝔥𝔯𝔦𝔰𝔱 𝔍𝔢𝔰𝔲𝔰" - 𝔓𝔥
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ's avatar
mleku 1 week ago
● Native American Trackers & Hair: The Story The claim you're asking about is a widely-circulated story alleging that: 1. The U.S. military recruited Native American trackers from reservations during the Vietnam War for their exceptional tracking abilities 2. After military haircuts, these recruits lost their "almost supernatural" tracking skills 3. Secret tests supposedly proved long hair was essential to their abilities, leading the military to exempt them from haircut regulations The Verdict: Urban Legend This story is unverified and likely false. Key findings: - No historical documentation exists of specialized Native American scouting units with long-haired soldiers - The U.S. Army Special Forces historians have called the story "pure mythology" - The earliest traceable source is a 2010 blog post by David "Avocado" Wolfe, with no cited sources - No scientific evidence supports hair providing tracking or sensory abilities What's Actually True - Many Native Americans served in Vietnam (most volunteered before being drafted) - They were integrated into regular units, not special tracking units - The military did recruit scouts, but targeted Viet Cong defectors who actually knew the terrain and enemy tactics Alternative Explanations Some have proposed that if any decline occurred, it could be: - Psychological: Loss of confidence after losing a cultural symbol - Trauma: The forced haircut as cultural severance affecting morale Sources: - - - > so, in other words, the psychological torment of military service and degrading of the value of the individual is more important. and probably also the unfamiliarity of the loss of a part of their body they were used to from a young age ● Yes, that's a more grounded interpretation. Even without supernatural claims, there are real factors at play: Cultural trauma: For many Native American cultures, long hair carries deep spiritual and identity significance. Forced cutting was historically used as a tool of assimilation in boarding schools ("Kill the Indian, save the man" policy). A military haircut would echo that same cultural violence. Proprioceptive disruption: Hair does provide subtle sensory feedback - wind direction, proximity of objects near the head, environmental awareness. Someone who has had long hair since childhood would have decades of unconscious calibration to that input. Removing it suddenly could genuinely cause disorientation, similar to how people feel "off" after major physical changes. Military deindividuation by design: The uniform haircut serves the explicit purpose of stripping individual identity to create unit cohesion. For someone from a culture that was subjected to systematic erasure, this "standard procedure" carries a different weight entirely. Performance under psychological stress: If a tracker believes their ability is connected to their hair (regardless of whether it physically is), confidence matters. A demoralized, disoriented person performs worse than a confident one - that's not mysticism, that's basic psychology. The supernatural framing makes the story easy to dismiss. The actual dynamics of cultural trauma, bodily autonomy, and psychological warfare are harder to wave away.
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ's avatar
mleku 1 week ago
my favourite song about saturnalia
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ's avatar
mleku 1 week ago
ɪᴛ ᴍᴀᴋᴇꜱ ᴍᴇ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ꜱᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ɪᴅɢᴀꜰ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜɪꜱ ꜱᴛᴜᴘɪᴅ ꜰɪᴀᴛ ʜᴏʟɪᴅᴀʏ. ᴀɴᴅ ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴀᴅ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ꜱᴏ ᴍᴀɴʏ ᴏꜰ ʏᴏᴜ ᴀʀᴇ ᴄʜᴀɴᴛɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴀʀᴋᴇᴛɪɴɢ ꜱʟᴏɢᴀɴꜱ. ᴘʟᴇᴀꜱᴇ ɢʀᴏᴡ ᴀ ʙʀᴀɪɴ. ᴇꜱᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟʟʏ ᴄᴀᴛʜᴏʟɪᴄꜱ. ʜᴏᴡ ᴅᴏᴇꜱ ᴊᴇʀᴇᴍɪᴀʜ ɴᴏᴛ ʙᴇ ᴛᴀʟᴋɪɴɢ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴄʜʀɪꜱᴛᴍᴀꜱ ᴛʀᴇᴇꜱ? ᴏʜ ʏᴇᴀʜ, ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ᴡɪꜱᴇ ᴘʀɪᴇꜱᴛꜱ ꜱᴛᴏᴘᴘᴇᴅ ʏᴏᴜ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ʀᴇᴀᴅɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴏᴋ ᴏꜰ ᴊᴀꜱʜᴇʀ ᴡʜᴇʀᴇ ɪᴛ ɪꜱ ᴄʟᴇᴀʀʟʏ ꜱᴛᴀᴛᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇxɪꜱᴛᴇɴᴄᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ʟɪᴋᴇ ʟᴏᴍʙᴀʀᴅʏ ᴀɴᴅ ɪᴛᴀʟɪᴀ. ɴᴏ, ʏᴏᴜ ᴅɪᴅɴ'ᴛ ʀᴇᴀʟɪꜱᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇꜱᴇ ᴇxɪꜱᴛᴇᴅ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ 2500 ʏᴇᴀʀꜱ ᴀɢᴏ. ᴛʜᴀᴛ'ꜱ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇ ʏᴏᴜ ᴛʀᴜꜱᴛ ᴛʜᴇꜱᴇ ʟɪᴀʀꜱ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴠᴀᴛɪᴄᴀɴ.
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ's avatar
mleku 1 week ago
anᴛʜroᴘɪc ɪs oꜰꜰerɪnɢ me 2x normaʟ ᴛoᴋens anᴅ ɪ'm sᴛucᴋ on a neᴛworᴋ connecᴛɪon ᴛʜaᴛ ʙareʟʏ ᴘusʜes 1mʙɪᴛ. ɪ can'ᴛ use ɪᴛ. ɪ ʜaᴅ 3 ɪnsᴛances ᴊusᴛ now, worᴋɪnɢ on ᴛʜɪnɢs anᴅ ɪ ᴅon'ᴛ ᴛʜɪnᴋ mʏ currenᴛ connecᴛɪon can ʙareʟʏ ᴅo ᴛwo. noᴛʜɪnɢ ɪ can ᴅo aʙouᴛ ɪᴛ ʙeᴛween now anᴅ ᴛʜe enᴅ oꜰ ᴛʜe oꜰꜰer, aᴛ ʟeasᴛ noᴛʜɪnɢ sɪmᴘʟe. maʏʙe ɪ couʟᴅ renᴛ a ʙeeꜰʏ muʟᴛɪcore vᴘs anᴅ remoᴛe conᴛroʟ ɪᴛ, ᴛo ʟɪmɪᴛ mʏ ᴛraꜰꜰɪc ᴛo ɪᴛs ꜰancʏ ᴛuɪ ᴛraꜰꜰɪc onʟʏ, ʙuᴛ even ᴛʜen ɪ ɢoᴛᴛa move aʟʟ mʏ reᴘos onᴛo sucʜ a rɪɢ, on ᴛʜɪs ᴘɪssʏ connecᴛɪon. ɪ am conᴅemneᴅ ᴛo noᴛ worᴋ so ʜarᴅ ꜰor ᴛʜe nexᴛ weeᴋ. ᴛoo ʙaᴅ, so saᴅ.