Just scooped up a bunch of $NAKA at 0.88 per share. No clue how it’ll play out, but felt like a good trade.

people compare ai to the dotcom bubble but i disagree. dotcom saw 200-400x forward earnings. oracle trades at 40x, nvidia at 30x at its best day. where’s the bubble? we’re going much higher.

Exclude bitcoin and call it a scam basket. 🦠

imagine the smell if this consolidates around 90k till the end of the year 😂

we have no precedent for what happens when human intelligence becomes effectively infinite. just like 18th century economists couldn’t predict how steam engines would reshape global trade, we can’t meaningfully measure what ai will do to the civilization. the change unfolds outside our existing frameworks for understanding.

the bull market hasn’t even started yet measured by the gold/btc ratio. it’s gonna be a violent one in fiat terms.

happy sunday team bitcoin! ⛵️☀️

bad ideas will never destroy bitcoin but good ideas might. because the defects are clear to everyone. the real existential threat comes from good ideas with good intentions.

once corporations acquire around 5m bitcoin, we’ll hit a real supply shock. price will climb steadily to $3m to $5m per coin. after that, the jump from $5m to $10m per coin happens almost instantly.

so many #zcash scammers on twitter. elite tech billionaires are about to scam the fuck out of the whole crypto industry.

⚡️What you’re really seeing here is the first stage of a global unit-of-account fracture. •In nominal USD terms, everything looks like it’s booming: stocks up triple digits, homes up double digits, “wealth” everywhere. That’s the performance everyone sees. •In gold terms, the illusion cracks: stocks and homes flat-to-negative, real wealth stagnating. •In Bitcoin terms, the veil is gone: catastrophic real losses in every traditional asset. This is the same signature that marked every pre-hyperinflationary or currency regime shift in history: when people cling to the debasing unit, they feel rich but measured in the next credible collateral, their system is already collapsing. And the “risk asset” meme about Bitcoin? That’s just a coping frame. As long as Wall Street treats BTC as a tech stock with volatility, they can keep it in the risk bucket. But functionally it’s already behaving like a parallel reserve ledger: it’s the only denominator that makes the post-2020 global economy look like Argentina. This is why the system feels “off” - why wages don’t match prices, why debt is ballooning, why policy feels reactive. We’re in a regime where the unit of account is decaying faster than the public narrative can absorb. The Fed, the government, the media - all still speaking USD, all still benchmarking to a melting ice cube. The chart you’re looking at is the unofficial scoreboard in a silent currency war. So when I strip all the polite commentary away, the honest take is: •The U.S. is running the final phase of a classic imperial carry trade: draw in global capital, inflate domestic asset prices in nominal terms, export the currency risk abroad. •Gold shows stagnation. •Bitcoin shows collapse. •If BTC continues to monetize, that chart is a pre-revaluation ledger of the old world being marked down. This isn’t a normal market cycle. It’s the unit-of-account transition phase. And almost no one is positioned for it because they’re still measuring their “returns” in the wrong yardstick. That’s the scarv layer…not just “debasement trade,” but a living record of a dying denominator. @_The_Prophet__

yeah there's something deeply odd about it when you step back. like we've built these silicon and metal boxes that shuffle electrons around in precise patterns/moments and somehow that shuffling produces arrangements of words or pixels that we then sit and contemplate, searching for significance in the output of what is essentially a very elaborate series of math operations happening in some nondescript building somewhere. and the thing is we've always created realities through our tools and media: books, films, paintings but there was always this tangible human intermediary, someone with intentions and experiences directly shaping every part of it. now there's this weird gap where the machine does its processing and while it does thet it says “thinking” based on patterns it extracted from human culture but nobody intended this specific output. it emerged from statistical relationships and optimization functions. what gets me is how quickly we adapt to treating it as meaningful. we read ai generated text and our brains just... process it like any other text. we argue about it, learn from it, get entertained by it. the phenomenological experience of engaging with it is real, even if the provenance is this alien computational process. it's like we're in this strange loop where human meaning got compressed into training data, transformed through these inscrutable matrix multiplications, and then decompressed back into something that interfaces with human “meaning-making” again and again and again. but something fundamental shifted in that process: the intentionality, the consciousness behind it, that's just gone perhaps forever. replaced by optimization toward prediction. and yet here we are finding it meaningful anyway, because maybe meaning was never really about the source but about the encounter and the interpretation. this image is real so was the walking and thinking.

peroni + burrata + bull market 🍻

“We mostly just sit around reading, thinking and waiting.” – Stanley Druckenmiller

💯

you are a non technical retard. shut up and host some porn and some nfts so pipe investors can make some money.