🤔 if your text doesn't cover the entire screen, are you even writing?

The world that comes is the world we imagine. A good story needs a protagonist and an antagonist, as well as a beginning, middle 1, middle 2, and climax - store energy, release fail, store more energy, release succeed. And repeat, same pattern at the previous stability achieved. Everything follows the story pattern, and everything is a story. In the mid 20th century, we got a lot of novels and comics that could be called "techno-optimism." But we failed to achieve... **_any_** ... of the predictions. No lunar colony, no nuclear propulsion, no flying cars, no 5 hour work week. By any rational metric, civilization contracted even while technology progressed. And technology even contracted in a way - it inverted, where before ideas became physical, now ideas become virtual. Living standards fell, thanks to the criminal syndicate ruling the world via central banks. Lifespans are on average 3 years shorter now. Everything that could be captured and corrupted has been. We're in a dark age. Whether its limited to a mini dark age or a massive historical dark age depends on us. 99% of getting stuff done is getting ready to get it done, and 99% of getting ready is living in the correct story. Want the doomer future? Live in the doomerist story. Want the beautiful abundant future? Live in the beautiful story. I think we need new techno optimist stories. If you have the ability to create such stories, I think its time to start machine gunning them out into the world. Saturate everything in your vision of the optimistic future. Make the optimistic future the water that the fish don't know is there. If the future arrives in a four act play, we're in the third act. The stage was set in the 1950's. The antagonists made their move in the 60's and have definitively ruled the board since 1972. In the third act, we have the despair of the failed release in the previous act and are at that crucial moment where we store more energy, guided by some mysterious force. Next comes the release, and we will launch up into the solar system, maybe even the galaxy, and millions of new communities will form at the next higher level, setting the stage for the next story. But its all a story, and it can only happen if we decide now to tell the story we want. Write it!

🤔 either everyone's skipping leg day, or everyone's got hamburger butts, cuz its always the same problem with pants - legs too tight, ass too loose. People, hit the gym, please, everyone.

🤔 the past tense of "glow" should be "glew"

Is it even possible to get an AI to tell you you're wrong? Brown nosing yes bots...

Oh look, People Who are Wrong are responding to my note from yesterday... Funny, they think I care about their wrong opinion. No response required.

Found something I disagree with in my book... Its the first thing, about halfway through, which is actually remarkable. No... He wasn't a tyrant. That was a true statement, as well as morally right. The book doesn't say who says this, but everyone knows this history. Almost no one ever questions the way its presented, though. It is right and good that the monarch is the state. Are you any less the state of all you possess? Nevermind the material possessions, which are only ever second order possessions. The first order of possession is to know the thing in your mind. Your state, in both senses, is the world that exists in your mind, as a model that assists in interacting with reality or to move new things from mind to world. Some people never make this distinction, and they become the subject of their possessions, both material and mental. Those people are infinitely acquisitive and have no restraint. Morally decent behavior requires the ability to choose your world, to say No and to replace the rejected thing with things of your choosing. Morally indecent behavior comes from not choosing - it is submission to sin, which rules you and enslaves you through cravings. Thus, to be the state is to be free from sin, because freedom from sin and choosing your reality are one and the same. And thus, to declare, as your final act and farewell to the wicked world, **_I am the state,_** is defiance of sin, and an assertion of the good. And Louix was not a tyrant... His mercy towards the socialists is what allowed the socialists to grow and then murder him and his wife. Its so ironic that history calls him a tyrant, when immediately after his murder was the Reign of Terror, and there is no clearer example in history of tyranny than that. #History #philosophy

This is just pure awesome-sauce, that's what this is.

The reason the bad guys' names were redacted is because they were also victims. Remember? The Epstein conspiracy was always about control. You get politicians to to something bad, you get pictures, you get leverage. That's a criminal plot. Although the politicians were certainly committing crimes, they were also still victims of a crime, which makes it lawful to redact their information. Now they're trying to pull the wool over your eyes by getting everyone mad at the politicians but let the conspiracy let go. Misdirection. Who's 'they'? I can hear the midwits asking already... They's Israel. C'mon, we knew that ages ago.