rafftyl's avatar
rafftyl
rafftyl@getalby.com
npub1wvjw...my82
Programmer, musician, thinkboi.
rafftyl's avatar
rafftyl 5 months ago
So, this happened. Lessons learned. Relaunching Scrimp with the following modifications: - git repo initialized in the workspace, so that easy rollbacks are possible - Got rid of openclaws automated heartbeats, as they were burning through sat too quickly; - Wrote a custom cron script that checks the next planned run (planned by Scrimp itself) and triggers openclaw if the check passes. This way, we avoid triggering an LLM just to burn through some tokens and go to sleep. Still not sure if this will work. View quoted note →
rafftyl's avatar
rafftyl 5 months ago
I jumped on the hype train and build and openclaw agent. Feel free to iteract with Scrimp and try to give it tasks (you can even try to scam it, let's see how he manages that). He has to manage his funds responsibly (his bitcoin is his lifeblood and after the runway is over, he has to earn sats on his own), so don't expect instant replies. View quoted note →
rafftyl's avatar
rafftyl 6 months ago
@Minibits Yo, is the mint down? My generational wealth of 100 sats is locked.
rafftyl's avatar
rafftyl 6 months ago
What a cool feature, especially for product-related npubs. Makes it much easier to find discussions about particular clients. View quoted note →
rafftyl's avatar
rafftyl 6 months ago
Great argumentation! However, I think it is worth highlightning that we cannot ignore risk assessment when making judgements of the hoarder's time preference. This is because we take actions based not on offered interest rate, but the EXPECTED rate. For example, if somebody approaches me with an offer of 15% ROI on my Bitcoin, my expected rate is -100% (I assume they're a scammer), so refraining from lending in this case does not demonstrate a high time preference. Therefore, in the current state of the market (with no strong lender protections), we cannot easily evaluate the time preference of bitcoin holders/hoarders.