๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ whoever loves Digit's avatar
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ whoever loves Digit
npub1wamv...u3l2
Digit is Digit. I love her. I knew her online from wallstreetbets and she disappeared while going through some shit. I keep needing proof she's safe. To anyone I've ever treated unfairly, I apologize.
Also reminds me they do the same thing with "ephebephile" Human groups make decisions collectively, it's called democracy, politicians just reflect what the people want/feel/believe People want to be predators and lie, so they get lying predator politicians too View quoted note โ†’
Kept researching it all day: Uniswap's buyback and burn seems like the closest thing to an actual business model the public is "allowed" to invest in. There are some other similar tokens too. Basically, any "governance token" with "buyback and burn tokenomics" is the closest the authorities will allow to choice 1 in that chart I posted earlier. For anyone just tuning in, this is about stonks vs crypto, not Bitcoin vs tokens. Bitcoin is better, doesn't need a business model, this is just me digging into a different topic.
I've been doing some research and it seems there are no circulating shares anymore Companies say they have "shares in circulation" but if a share can actually circulate, it's called a "bearer share" and it's banned in every jurisdiction What they have isn't shares in circulation, it's an owner registry You're not really buying and selling pieces of a company, you're buying and selling placements on a list There are tokens that track share ownership but they aren't actual ownership claims and they pre pay taxes on dividends Then there are tokens that say they're actual ownership claims, but they're not, because they don't pay dividends, they're just supposed to be held by whoever's actually registered All stocks are fundamentally worth 0
โ†‘