I’ve only heard Sheryl Sandberg’s voice twice. Once as a narrator for her book where she grieves her husband. And when she last participated in the All-in podcast.
On both occasions the tremolo in her voice was overwhelming, verging on overused.
I realize some people feel more than others but this feels more like a tool in service of communicating and, frankly, marketing.
It makes me sound heartless, especially in the face of what she experienced. But I’m, at best, distracted by the artifice.
Do you need to make people sob in order to get your point across?
Or is it the topic that she uses that demand a bit of sobbing?
No matter, leave the sobbing to the audience. No acting necessary.
ETFs drained number-go-up people out of Bitcoin. They can look at their Wall Street portfolio and feel it’s going to keep going up. They might not care so much about the values Bitcoin represents.
Will the number go up? Bitcoin without freedom is just an NFT. A rare digital asset. It’s not money.
ETF (decoupling) + anti-privacy attacks are very scary to me. They harm the money in bitcoin.
Let’s say we want to solve for nuclear proliferation and eliminate this manmade existential risk. What would have to be true?
Intercept? A way to cheaply reach the warhead before it is heading down to its target and disable it? Ideally immediately at launch?
Establish a registry for all rockets and deploy interception at whichever launch hasn’t been registered?
We would need to detect launches and have enough spread out interceptors. What would these look like?