Spammers, Scammers and Coretards actions speak volumes. View quoted note →

My guess is that 99.9999% people with slave mentality can say "I have nothing to hide." People who don't value freedom of speech and freedom of choice and freedom in any sense. People who are either dumb enough to not understand what they are saying or just scared cowards that think that being small and compliant will somehow keep them out of trouble with the power machine, which of course is naive and/or dumb too. The exception is probably just God who would have nothing to hide. But if there are some God-like brave individuals who are so pristine to not need to hide anything then full transparency should be a personal choice. Not a default for everyone. View quoted note →

Got #Bitcoin? Be free with freedom tech. GNU/Linux, BSD, Nostr, Torrents, OpenSource, local AI View quoted note →

Cypherpunks value Bitcoin Freedom Money. BIP 110 is Cypherpunk AF. View quoted note →

The WEF disgusting anti-human warmonger pedo fascists are telling you all those things while flying in private jets and polluting more than anyone else with the goal to enslave and fully control the masses. Fucking evil. View quoted note →

Be free. Use freedom tech. View quoted note →

This.Is.Bitcoin!

Spammers and scammers only care for their grift. View quoted note →

Happy Birthday Satoshi Nakamoto!

"In QM the number of dimensions in Hilbert Space grows exponentially with the number of qubits (the building blocks of quantum computers). In RaQM, the information content in the quantum state only grows linearly with the number of qubits. ‘In RaQM, above a critical number of entangled qubits, there simply isn’t enough information in the quantum state to allocate even one bit of information to each dimension of Hilbert Space,’ explains Professor Palmer. ‘When this happens, quantum algorithms that utilise all of Hilbert Space will stop having a quantum advantage over classical algorithms. An example is Shor’s algorithm for factoring integers and hence decrypting RSA-encrypted messages.’ Professor Palmer predicts that Shor’s algorithm will start to fail in this way when a few hundred (error-corrected) qubits are entangled. This is bad news for those looking to develop quantum computers for practical applications. However, Professor Palmer views things more positively: ‘If quantum computers provide the experiments not only to find a successor theory to QM, but more importantly to find the theory which synthesises quantum and gravitational physics, that would surely be an extraordinarily good outcome for all the work that has been put into quantum computing over the years.’"

University of Oxford Department of Physics

Rational quantum mechanics: a new theory of quantum physics

In a paper published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Emeritus Professor Tim Palmer FRS considers quantum mecha...