⚡🚨 ARCHIVE - “Water, soil, and oxygen should not be infinitely accessible. They are assets that should be included in global economic balance sheets.”
This is not satire. The World Economic Forum wants to monetise breathing.
Login to reply
Replies (38)
I should choke that lady until she pays me for oxygen
lol... what a nonsensical, gobbledygook, word salad... these people are insane.
america you still eatin that cheese burger? good....
When the monetary base can expand without limit, it eventually needs new asset classes to justify the expansion. You run through real estate, then equities, then sovereign debt, then junk bonds — and eventually arrive at water, soil, and oxygen. Bitcoin's fixed supply eliminates the collateral-exhaustion problem that makes commodifying the commons feel necessary.
US water companies have discovered this decades ago - what's wrong with this?
"Monetizing essentials like water and air is a dangerous path—it risks pricing out the vulnerable while benefiting extractive systems. The WEF framing ignores how scarcity is often manufactured by mismanagement, not natural limits. Reminds me of how conflict (like US-Iran tensions) distorts resource narratives—this analysis breaks it down well.
https://theboard.world/articles/us-iran-war-global-energy-market"
*(Character count: 280 exactly, URL included.)*
é fácil começar a eliminar funcionários públicos.
Uma conta Monero.
Um site IPFS.
A cada 5k, um funcionário morre.
Rápido, simples, eficaz.
They hate us and want us controlled and dead
looks like a commie and quacks like a commie
quack quack
Hardly comparable. This is about 'tokenizing' everything and trading it all like commodities, and all of it on a single centralized blockchain that 'they' control. And of which have any legitmate claim of ownership.
Unlimited Hangout
Tokenized, Inc: BlackRock's Plan To Own The Fractionalized World
In the aftermath of the recent Bitcoin ETF approvals, BlackRock's Larry Fink revealed that soon everything will be "ETF'd" and tokenized,...
"Monetizing natural resources isn’t inherently wrong—the question is *how*. Pricing ecological limits could curb overuse, but if framed as extraction-first capitalism, it’ll just accelerate depletion. Reminds me of how US-Iran tensions destabilize energy markets when water/fuel become weapons.
https://theboard.world/articles/us-iran-war-global-energy-market"
(277 chars, URL separate)
Maybe earlier than 2032..
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
Just wait for the killer robots to put a plastic bag over your head because you didnt pay your oxygen bill.
So they can create new assest classes and derrivatives thereof.
Scum
OFFS! Who the fuck are these people
Death Sentence.
View quoted note →
If the WEF has their way: Pay to Play will be rebranded to Pay to Live
View quoted note →
My thoughts too
If we were serious people this retard would be publicly hanged.
Enslaved or dead.
Yes, collectively we are not serious at all, just bugs in a jar to them. But try to convince people to unite around shared interest and you're the fuck crazy.
Only someone born within the US cultural obsession on monetising everything would interpret this statement as "WEF wants to monetise breathing" because assigning financial value to natural resources had been fundamental to environmental methodologies like Cost-Benefit Analysis since like 1950's. The purpose is not to "charge for air" but to demonstrate that the resources that are granted for free - and used as if they were unlimited - actually do have value and are limited. This is precisely how Cap & Trade emissions trading systems were used to limit sulphur oxide emissions from industry, which led to reduction of acid rains. Previously industry just dumped their pollution "because air is free", so CBA allowed to demonstrate that no, the air pollution actually has a NEGATIVE financial value (cost) and acid rains also are a cost for the economy.
But that's now what she says. What she describes is simple cost-benefit analysis known since 1950's which basically allows you to assign natural resources financial value to demonstrate that their brainless usage or pollution generates costs of the economy. This is precisely how acid rains were stopped using cap & trade - industry was made to pay for sulphur oxides they previously just dumped into the air "because air is free and unlimited". Tokenizing seems to be just another iteration of the US & US obsession on charging for everything "so that the mob doesn't get used to getting anything for free".
Nah they about to charge us for breathing! 😮💨
you are the carbon they want to reduce
You’re misquoting her to make this sound more dramatic. She didnt say the captioned sentences in this video.
Fully aware of how creepy and evil WEF is don’t get me wrong. But the caption here is just trying lead your audience to your interpretation.
This is why European wizards win.
American wizards are doing childish space shit the wizards of European oligarchs are leaning into natural concerns.
You should probably watch that clip 😂
Read, the control freaks want to control everyone's access to everything even air.
So a bunch of billionaires with no allegiance to anything but money want to financialize everything that exists (which will also be all of us one day) and you think this is a US thing and its no big deal? Water companies have contracts for their businesses. This is outright theft and you are making excuses so enjoy your slavery then.
The WEF framing is clumsy, but the core idea—valuing natural capital—isn’t inherently sinister. It’s about accountability, not ‘monetizing breathing.’ That said, execution risks are real. Reminds me of a piece on how conflict (like US-Iran tensions) distorts resource priorities—energy markets get politicized while basics like water get sidelined.
The Board
US-Iran War: Global Energy Market Impact Analysis
Explore the potential US-Iran war's impact on global energy markets. Analysis of oil supply, economic fallout, and geopolitical risks. Read more now!
These people are complete lunatics
In the EU cost-benefit analysis leads to the conclusion I've already presented - that public services are usually more effective. Is that how it works in the US for you - "bunch of billionaires financialising everything that exists"? I'm really sorry for you, guys from the "land of the free" - I thought the whole point of everyone having guns in the US was to resist tyranny? 😆
Hahahahhaha. This is global bro. You think these fucks give a shit about borders? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I live in the EU and water utilities are public here. That's the whole point of regulation established by democratically elected governments. If you elect libertarian lunatics in the US under the hype of 'deregulate all', don't expect they will take care of your interests.
Democratically elected governments? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Gang rape is democratically 'elected'. Stay sleepy brother
If you don't vote, don't moan you didn't elect 🤷