Sunglasses abusive. Sunglasses decreases melanin production. Sunglasses makes you way more sensitive to the sun. Sunglasses and vitiligo Dr. Jack Kruse: "Every mammal (but us) doesn't wear sunscreen, doesn't have clothes, doesn't wear sunglasses. I think some moms are going to be stunned by this because the moms are making the big example. "When I see a mom, and she's got sunglasses on, I know by definition her child is being abused. The reason why is when you put sunglasses on your eyes, do you know what it does? It decreases the melanin production in your skin. So for those of you who don't know, melanin is the thing that gives you the tan in your body. So what does that mean? Wearing sunglasses makes you way more sensitive to the sun. "That's functionally what happens in people that get the disease (that you've probably heard of) that Michael Jackson had, which is vitiligo. I want you to think about every picture of Michael Jackson from the time he was 25 to 50 before he died. He had sunglasses on. He always wore them everywhere, didn't he? That's where the vitiligo comes from." Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 14:43–15:43 (posted 2023-02-04)

Instead of a statin, get more sun for high cholesterol. Chronic high cholesterol levels is almost always associated with low vitamin D levels Dr. Jack Kruse: "Vitamin D is made endogenously in our skin, but vitamin D is a very interesting vitamin because it's not a vitamin; it's a neurosteroid. And vitamin D, one of the things that it does is it gets created in the skin from cholesterol and 312 nm light, which is UVB light. It changes a double bond in a ring in cholesterol to turn it into something called 25-hydroxyvitamin D. That's not the the key factor. It has to go to the kidney and liver then to be converted to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. "So can you have a problem with vitamin D that starts on the skin, or could you have a problem if the kid has a problem with their liver or their kidney? The answer is yes. A lot of times this never gets worked out. The most common reason for children why it's a problem is their skin is blocked from clothing or sunscreen. "The reason why this is a big deal in adults, let's talk about mom and dad now. Mom and dad, if you look at your blood work, and you notice when they do a lipid profile on you that your cholesterol level is going up, I can almost guarantee you what their answer is. They're going to tell you they want you to be on a statin. I'm going to tell you need to be in the sun more, because guess what happens? High cholesterol levels chronically over time is almost always associated with low vitamin D levels because you're not converting cholesterol into vitamin D." Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 50:06–51:34 (posted 2023-02-04)

The baby steals mom's vitamin D. Postpartum depression. Childhood cancers always start in the mom's mitochondrial DNA Dr. Jack Kruse: "If you're a new mom, say you just had a baby, I would tell every mother, 'You want to learn about you? Do a vitamin D level of your infant.' Why? Because where does that baby get all of its vitamin D from? You. The baby is stealing it from you. And so for example, if you have a baby and you wind up getting say, postpartum depression, I guarantee your vitamin D level is going to be below 30, because the baby got everything it needs and you don't have anything left. "The reason why this is important, remember that everything that that child is, most of it is coming from you. You get some stuff from your dad, but it's really about you. And people always ask me this question, you know, when we talk about childhood cancers and this and that, and this kind of pisses a lot of parents off. Most kids that have problems, it stems from mom and dad. It's called transgenerational epigenetics. When I was a young doctor we didn't know anything about this. We didn't start knowing about this until some Duke studies in 2003. Now it's become the big deal, because I always get asked questions about you know childhood cancers. Childhood cancers always start in the mom's maternal DNA, meaning the mitochondrial DNA. And that can be passed on from great grandma, to grandma, to you. You put the engines in your children, not your husband. "So that means if you optimize you, you can fix your kids. The problem is you need to know that you are the boss lady, and I mean that literally and figuratively. So if you know that your kid's having a problem, before you ever take the kid to the pediatrician, you better start asking questions like, 'What about our environment or what about my maternal side could this be linked to?' Because that is the place you need to go." Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 44:35–46:36 (posted 2023-02-04)

Blue light destroys melatonin. Neural degeneration. Melatonin supplementation thins retina, harms central retinal pathway Dr. Jack Kruse: "I mean I'm appalled as a neurosurgeon that parents see no problem with putting their kids on melatonin instead of, you know, getting off their lazy ass and reading a paper and say blue light destroys melatonin. […] Parents think, 'Well, if I destroy it with the iPad, he'll scream when he's in the restaurant. I want some peace in my life. I'll just give them 6 mg of melatonin at night.' That decision-making process is so bad, because you're setting that kid up for so many problems down the road. The problem is doctors are not doing a good job explaining to parents why that's a bad decision." […] "But me as a neurosurgeon, and knowing what it does to the central retinal pathways into the brainstem, I think in the next 10 or 15 years you're going to find out that almost all cases of neural degeneration begin in the eye from this process we're talking about. And when these children grow up in their 30, 40, 50 years old and you're going to start seeing people who got these diseases, when I was a kid, at 70, 80 years old, but now it happens in 30 and 40 year olds, that's when people are going to get the wake up. Because it usually takes somebody getting a punch in the mouth before they actually change, because right now people cannot fathom that a change in screen time, a change in light, makes this big a difference. […] "If you give your kids melatonin to help them sleep, it's because their mitochondria aren't making it. When you give the kid melatonin long enough you downregulate the melatonin production that they make in their own mitochondria. So you're turning off the machinery because you're getting an exogenous signal. So it ultimately makes your kid worse. What some of the effects that can happen to a child down the road? They can thin their retina, they can get retinal tears. They can develop really big problems with their central retinal pathways. Why? Because it turns out melatonin and dopamine regenerate all the photoreceptors in your eye. Does the pediatrician ever tell you that? No. Why? Because they're looking to give you the centralized answer to get you out of their office in 10 minutes, and that's it, you know, for your $25 copay. If you do your own homework you'll find that those answers are out there. So melatonin I've already told you is made in the mitochondria, so supplementing that is a big no-no." Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 05:48–07:55 & 49:00–50:04 (posted 2023-02-04)

Lack of sunlight more harmful than smoking. Blue-lit screens destroy dopamine levels. School shootings. Children much more sensitive to non-native EMF. Giving a kid an iPhone is child abuse Dr. Jack Kruse: "There's been six meta-analysis in the literature. The last one happened in 2016 in Sweden, and it basically said that lack of sunlight is more dangerous to your health than smoking cigarettes. So that should stop like every mother and go, 'Wait a minute. I clearly don't want my kid vaping or smoking, but you're telling me that this effect is as big as them doing that?' And see the problem is, keeping kids out of the sun doesn't have a negative connotation because of the dermatologists, the pediatricians, and it needs to. "When you think about the flip side of this, that those kids have grown up, especially the kids today, have grown up in a world where everything is blue-lit, like blue-lit screens, digital babysitting, when families go and buy a kid iPhone, iPad, right off the beginning. If you put a spectroscope on that technology screen, you would not like what you'd see. And we now know the science is well developed that blue light causes breakdown in the retina. The breakdown in the retina leads to changes not only in the retina but also in the brain. So the number one thing that people probably want to hear about, when I was a kid, you know, we never had school shootings, we never had kids killing themselves left and right. Today it's an epidemic. What many of you may not know is that that's directly related to the amount of screen time that you have. "And the reason for that is blue light destroys dopamine levels, and the dopamine is a chemical that I think most people have heard of. It's most widely associated with Parkinson's disease, but that's not the key thing. If you go and look at addictive behaviors for depression it's also associated with those. And the reason for that, in the pathway of your eye, you have a clock called the suprachiasmatic nucleus. And we now know in the last five, six years that those neurons stop at a place in the brainstem called the habenular nucleus. That habenular nucleus in that part of your hypothalamus actually controls your mood. "I know moms have probably heard this as well. Children are much more sensitive to non-native EMF or fake light because their brains aren't fully myelinated. That's the reason why children can't rent cars or hotel rooms until they're 25 years old because their frontal lobes are not even myelinated. The flip side of that argument is they're much more sensitive to these frequencies. And parenting has changed so much in the last 30 years that people think it's A-OK to go give a kid an iPhone. And in my opinion that's child abuse. It's just like going into a Walmart and beating the snot out of your kid and everybody just standing there and looking at it. And the reason why is because it doesn't have a negative connotation, kind of like I told you about the sun. "So when you add these two parts of the coin together too much artificial light at night, and no sun during the day, you set these kids up for an absolute train wreck in terms of their health." Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 02:02–05:22 (posted 2023-02-04)

There is no detox from the vax. You have to redox, not detox Dr. Jack Kruse: "There is no detox from the vax. […] We now know through a lot of the work of all the scientists that are on Twitter, you know, people that are linked to both me and Kevin McKernan that it's redox. You have to build your redox, you have to keep your immune system in tip-top shape, you have to keep the genome quiet, because we know there's intercalation across the board. You get intercalation just from the jab. You get intercalation also from COVID itself. "And we know that the spike is persistent. We know the spike is a mitochondrial toxin. So anybody who tells you that you can get a detox protocol, they're fucking idiots. Why? Because your immune system is constantly making the spike. So that means that you need to have a different plan. And that different plan is you have to redox, not detox. "And that means making sure that your natural killer cells are in tip-top shape, that you understand that where those cells come from, T-regulatory cells in your skin. Your skin needs to look like this [tanned]. You need to be in the sun all the time. You took the jab and you think you can live in Massachusetts or Ontario. Like, just say you took seven of them and you live in Melbourne, you're fucked. You can't stay there. You just can't. And if you do realize what's going to happen to you, you are likely, even if you don't get the turbo cancer, you're gonna get an autoimmune condition. You're going to get some other condition." Dr. Jack Kruse with Brett Hanson @ 37:31–39:17 (posted 2025-09-02)

The skin acts like an accessory pituitary gland when exposed to UV. The skin takes its order from the light it is exposed to Max Gulhane, MD: "I'm glad you brought up Dr. Slominski, and we can definitely talk about his work. He is a US, they call dermatopathologist over there, so I guess a dermatologist that is also anatomically trained in anatomic pathology, so diagnosing and then actually looking at skin biopsies to potentially diagnose skin malignancies. But his work, and that paper that you referenced, it's almost heresy within centralized dermatology, because it really illustrates how important ultraviolet light is in a physiological way. And maybe my biggest takeaway from that paper was that the skin is actually acting like an accessory pituitary gland, pretty much. It's almost acting like a central endocrine organ in and of itself. It's able to secrete a whole bunch of these peptide hormones that, again, normally the hypothalamus or the pituitary gland is secreting. But on exposure to ultraviolet light it can make these proenkephalin compounds, obviously the melanocortin and POMC compounds, and all these other products that are needed for proper endocrine function. And that is completely even separate from the circadian signaling role, and it's obviously separate from the infrared light interactions." Cameron Borg: "Yeah, the skin is a compounding pharmacy, and it takes its orders from the spectrum that you give it. We have to start thinking of the skin the same way that we think of the brain. The skin is just an extension of the brain, and it takes its orders from what it's exposed to. And unfortunately for most people, what it's exposed to is absolute garbage, so it has no idea how to continue regulating in a way that's beneficial for the body." Cameron Borg with Max Gulhane, MD @ 24:22–26:25 (posted 2025-03-10)

People who use suncreen in Sweden have 10× the risk of malignant melanoma. You want to receive the most unaldulterated signal from your environment to prevent cancer Cameron Borg: "I mean another thing that's just an interesting point that Pelle Lindqvist told me was that, you know, I wasn't sure whether to believe him when he first told me. But I found the paper and sure enough, people who use sunscreen in Sweden have 10 times the risk of malignant melanoma compared to people who don't use sunscreen. He said it like it was nothing, but of course, no one knows about this here. You can buy 50+ sunscreen in every pharmacy here, even though you have less than fewer than 10 days a year with a high UV index. "So when you block the signal that's supposed to be coordinating the body, even if it seems like a relatively small thing, blocking a small signal can lead to large effects. It's the unfortunate thing (or perhaps the fortunate thing) about nonlinearity in the body is that small signals can have large effects, and vice versa. So yeah, just an interesting point about preventing cancer is you want to receive the most unadulterated signal from your environment as you possibly can, because that's ultimately the one that your body is looking for to coordinate itself in the best possible way." Cameron Borg with npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 01:06:30–01:08:01 (posted 2025-03-10)

It takes investment and risking to have a great relationship. Give your heart to the other person. We all mess up. Talk about it to connect Dr. John Gottman: "well, I hate to tell you this, John, but I don't think it takes emotional maturity. And I don't really think it takes knowing yourself either. I think it takes really investment and risking, really giving everything you've got in this relationship, and through the relationship you get to know yourself better. I think you can be neurotic as hell and have a great relationship. You know, you hear a lot of people saying, 'Well, you have to really love yourself first.' I think that's bullshit, too. I really don't think it's true. I think what you have to do is really give your heart to this other person. And that takes really cherishing what you have in this relationship, and really maximizing what you see is your partner's positive qualities, and minimizing the negative. We all have drawbacks, we all have things that aren't perfect in our relationship. All of us are flawed. Nobody gets out of childhood without some crazy buttons, you know, that make us flawed human beings. "But what makes a relationship work is really emphasizing and cherishing what you have in this person, learning about, learning to understand this person. And how do we learn to understand another person? By screwing up communication and arguing and fighting. "I mean most couples, a lot of times reporters ask me, 'What a couples fight about?' And my answer is, 'Absolutely nothing.' They don't fight about topics; they fight about failures to connect emotionally. You know, like couples watching television, and they made popcorn, and she says, 'OK, let's watch television.' He says, 'OK, let me see what's on.' And she says, 'Yeah, why don't you leave it at that station. I like that. That's interesting.' He says, 'OK. I will, but let me see what else is on.' She says, 'No, leave it.' And he says, 'Fine. Have your way.' She says, 'Wait a minute, why did you say, why did you say it like that? It kind of hurt my feelings.' He says, 'I said fine cause you can always watch what you want to watch and we always do it your way.' She says, 'You know, I don't want to watch television with you at all now.' And then he walks out and slams the door saying, 'Fine.' "What did they argue about? It wasn't finances or sex or in-laws. They just failed to connect. And if they talk about what happened then they get closer and they understand. You know, and that's really the way it goes in a relationship. We all mess up, and then if we talk about it, then we understand each other better, and we learn to love each other better." Dr. John Gottman with John Hudson Messerall & Tama Fulton @ 13:47%%16:15

LDL cholesterol attaches to bacteria. Immune system oxidizes LDL. Low LDL associated with greater risk of coronary disease. People on statins at a higher risk for infection Nick Jikomes: "What is LDL cholesterol? […]" Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "LDL is used in the immune system. LDL is attached to all kinds of bacteria and microorganisms." […] "And when they have done that, the bacteria are covered with LDL, they are attached to each other and taken up by the monocytes. And monocytes, they inactivate all microorganisms by oxidation. "So oxidized LDL is a common finding in patients with myocardial infarction. And today, most researchers think that it is oxidized LDL which is dangerous, but it is not. Oxidized LDL is the result of their immune system. […] "And if there are too much they are added to each other and may occlude the arterioles, in particular the arterioles around the heart, because here the interstitial pressure is much higher than elsewhere." Nick Jikomes: "So you're saying if you have an infection, what can happen is the LDL particles cause all these bacteria to stick together and clump up. Then you get oxidized LDL. And if there's too many of them, so if you have a really bad infection, and you get a huge mass of these clumped together, that is what could clog an artery." Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "Yeah." Nick Jikomes: "[…] If you had healthy individuals, and one person had low LDL, would they be more susceptible to infection?" Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "Oh, yes. Many studies have also shown that those with low LDL are have a greater risk of coronary heart disease. I would add that the proof that LDL participate in immune system it has been documented in many many studies, in particular in animal studies. Some researchers have infected the animals with microorganisms which which kill them. But if they also include or inject human LDL, they survive. […] "The risk of infection was demonstrated already for century ago by American researchers. They found that patients who had suffered from a severe infection, they were more heterosclerotic than other people." Nick Jikomes: "People who had severe infections had worse atherosclerosis." Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "People who suffer or die from infectious diseases, they were more atherosclerotic than healthy people." Nick Jikomes: "So atherosclerosis has something to do with these infections." Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "Yes. This was demonstrated for about a 100 years ago." […] Nick Jikomes: "Because they lower LDL cholesterol, would that mean that people who are on statins, compared to people who are not on statins, are at higher risk for infection?" Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "Oh, yes." Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD with Nick Jikomes @ 10:10–16:15 (posted 2025-08-25)

Sunlight needed to make cholesterol sulfate. High LDL if cholesterol is not sulfated. Vitamin D needs to be sulfated to be transported. Sunlight for autism. Melatonin sulfate Stephanie Seneff, PhD: "Sunlight is super, super important. So I want to mention that sunlight exposure to the skin will help to improve the blood. The sulfate problem can be greatly improved through sunlight exposure, and of course, vitamin D. "The skin makes cholesterol sulfate in response to sunlight, in addition to vitamin D sulfate. And cholesterol sulfate is a way to distribute cholesterol throughout the body. When you can't add sulfate to cholesterol you get high blood cholesterol. You get the cholesterol hiding inside those lipid particles, the LDL, that ends up with putting you on a statin drug because you've got too much LDL. That's because the cholesterol is not sulfated, so it can't be transported freely; it has to go inside that LDL particle. That's what's causing the high LDL, I think, is because of the impaired sulfation of the cholesterol. And of course the vitamin D also needs sulfate to be transported. So those are big issues. "But the sunlight exposure does more than give you vitamin D, and I want to emphasize that. That's an important thing for autism, to get out in the sunlight without sunscreen, without sunglasses, to allow the sunlight to influence the pineal gland to make melatonin sulfate to help you sleep. So just want to end on that. I wanted to mention that because that's important." Stephanie Seneff, PhD with Logan Duvall @ 56:20–57:32 (posted 2024-01-08)

Pfizer's bait & switch. Pfizer intentionally deceived FDA. FDA says no worries. FDA covers for the deceiver. RICO Efrat Fenigson: "Just to be sure that I understood, [Pfizer] applied for their emergency authorization using the clean process on the left, while when they went to production, roll it out to the public, they changed everything. So they got an authorization for something completely different?" Kevin McKernan: "Yes." […] Kevin McKernan: "So, what is in this region of the plasmid that is now in the shots that wasn't in the trial? This map on the right is what they gave to the EMA. This is a plasmid map. What you're seeing in the plasmid map is they have highlighted this spike protein over there between noon and 6 o'clock in yellow. […] "You'll notice there's nothing in that region in gray. That's very, very bizarre for that to not be annotated at all. […] DNA annotation tools don't selectively annotate like this and leave a desert of information. They annotate everything at once, which means someone at Pfizer went in and manually erased the information about SV40. So they knew. They intentionally deceived the FDA, and wanted to hide this, which begs the question, why? What are they hiding? Efrat Fenigson: "And why did the FDA not ask? They're supposed to know that this is not supposed to be submitted this way." Kevin McKernan: "They should know. Yes. And when we complained about this, they came back saying, 'OK, we looked through the sequence, and lo and behold, you're right. There is SV40 stuff there that they didn't tell us about. They're supposed to, by law, annotate every single open reading frame, and every ORF. They didn't do it, but we still don't think it's meaningful.' [laughs]" Efrat Fenigson: "You're serious." Kevin McKernan: "They started making excuses for pharma." Efrat Fenigson: "Get out." Kevin McKernan: "This is where it gets really ugly is they moved from being deceived to then doing the job of covering for the deceiver." Efrat Fenigson: "Oh my god. Which I believe then shows that they're a part of it." Kevin McKernan: "They are." Efrat Fenigson: "Because if they weren't a part of it they would straight up come and say, 'You know what? We've been fooled. We've been manipulated and here's the truth.' But obviously they're not doing that." Kevin McKernan: "They're not doing that. in fact they're running cover for them, which makes them complicit in the crime. It starts bringing in RICO. This is a racketeering exercise now, because they've been made aware of this, and they're still running cover." npub1k8dxqxgnv2p6ymwkamfrx237qjct3zezsx2xevt6z6nzdgalff3qy94qte with npub1dg6es53r3hys9tk3n7aldgz4lx4ly8qu4zg468zwyl6smuhjjrvsnhsguz @ 57:11–57:30 & 59:37–01:02:00 (posted 2025-07-23) https://rumble.com/v6wkesy-kevin-draft.html?start=3431

Glyphosate binds tightly manganese. Lactobacillus critically depend on manganese. Manganese accumulating in the substantia nigra causes Parkinson's, affects ADHD and autism Stephanie Seneff, PhD: "I think glyphosate is messing up a lot of these minerals, including copper, manganese, magnesium, iron, and cobalt. All of them are going to be bound tightly to glyphosate. Manganese, for example, is one I've written about. I've written a whole paper on manganese and glyphosate, and I think it's connected to autism as well. Manganese and all of these minerals play an important role in the brain, of course, and you can have toxicity, as well as they're critical as nutrients. So they can be both essential and toxic at the same time, which is very, very tricky. "But in this paper on manganese I know more about manganese and copper, although I know copper is also a problem because I remember there's a copper, there's a protein, I won't remember the name of that, it's been a while, cupra- something or other, that binds like seven or eight copper atoms, and it actually is essential for the absorption of iron, I believe. This enzyme that has copper plays a role in getting iron into the body. And so we have actually an epidemic in iron deficiency and iron toxicity at the same time right now, and I think that's because glyphosate messing up the iron. "The body has, again, sophisticated mechanisms for sort of trapping these minerals in certain biological chelators and then escorting them across the gut barrier, delivering them safely to cells. The cells have ways of taking them and storing them safely, you know, all of this mechanism that's in place to distribute them appropriately to where they need to go, and to make them available to play their role in some enzyme that depends upon them. Glyphosate is just messing all of that up by binding very tightly. "So it binds very tightly to the manganese, which prevents the bacteria, the lactobacillus, critically depend on manganese. They're really very interesting that way. They don't really care about iron at all, but they really care about manganese. Glyphosate keeps the manganese away from them, and then the lactobacillus get sick. And so they become reduced in numbers, and hen these pathogens take over the gut gets completely imbalanced with regard to which you know which microbes are living there. And then glyphosate grabs onto the manganese and carries it to the liver, and then the liver now has this manganese. Normally the liver sends a manganese back to the gut attached to bile acids, and then it gets distributed throughout the body via the blood system. But the liver can't do that because the glyphosate's hanging on to the maganese, and the manganese ends up being stored in the liver and in the gallbladder. "And then the only way to get rid of the manganese is to ship it on nerve fibers up to the brain. And manganese travels very well on nerve fibers which is very interesting it's a very interesting mineral. And so the manganese travels on the nerve fibers up to the brain centers. For example, the Parkinson's disease, you know, it it accumulates in the substantia nigra, which is the place where that's associated with Parkinson's damage to the substantia nigra. So the manganese ends up accumulating in the substantia nigra, and that can cause Parkinson's disease. "And this is something that's well known with welders. Welders are releasing a lot of manganese dust. Then they breath it into the nose, and then it travels along the nerve fibers that connect the nose to the brain center, and ends up causing a Parkinson's-like syndrome for welders. If they're exposed to this manganese in the dust, they end up with Parkinson's disease, because again of the manganese getting accumulating in those brain centers and causing damage. So I think, you know, either coming on the nerve fibers from the gut, or coming on the nerve fibers from the nose, the same thing you end up with. I think it's going to affect things like ADHD and autism as well." Stephanie Seneff, PhD with Logan Duvall @ 34:48–38:30 (posted 2024-01-08)

Gut microbes produce melatonin low in deuterium, excellent for mitochondria. OTOH, melatonin supplements are not low deuterium Stephanie Seneff, PhD: "I'd like to talk about melatonin because that's extremely interesting. In fact, there's a brand new paper, 2023, just came out. I was thrilled to see that, because it showed that glyphosate suppressed melatonin in rats, 43% reduction of melatonin in the blood samples in these rats. I think that may be a crucial, crucial aspect of glyphosate's toxicity. "And melatonin is very interesting because it comes from serotonin. Serotonin also comes from the shikimate pathway. So the serotonin is going to be, that's a neurotransmitter, it's going to be suppressed. Melatonin is serotonin with low deuterium hydrogens packed on top of it, because it puts a methyl group and an acetyl group onto the serotonin molecule to make melatonin. Both the acetyl and the methyl come from those gut microbes and from that hydrogen gas. You can trace them all the way back to say melatonin is going to be a fantastic deliverer of low deuterium hydrogen to the mitochondria. And melatonin has huge, huge list of beneficial elements to it. I mean, it's a wonderful antioxidant, it binds metals, it helps the mitochondria. I mean there's huge numbers of papers that say how wonderful melatonin is. "But if you take supplemental melatonin you're not going to have that benefit. This is something I like people to realize the problem. A big problem with supplements is that most of these supplements that are pure molecules are made in the chemistry lab. When you make them in the chemistry lab you have no clue about giving them low deuterium. So when you take a melatonin supplement you're taking a version of melatonin that's not healthy. And then your body's going to think that it is, and it's going to treat it as if it's providing low deuterium hydrogen, but it's not. So I think that can backfire if you take a lot of melatonin supplements." […] Logan Duvall: "Is there a bioidentical melatonin that you know of?" "Now, that's a good question. Yeah, it might be that there are sources of melatonin. I don't know about melatonin particularly, but I know a lot of the amino acids are made in the chemistry lab. It could be that melatonin is processed through some, you know, bacteria, harvested from bacteria, something like that. You'd have to look up to see how melatonin is produced." Stephanie Seneff, PhD with Logan Duvall @ 30:15–32:02 & 32:52–33:22 (posted 2024-01-08)

Full remission from primary hypothyroid and Hashimoto's after staying in Costa Rica. Hypothyroidism and autism. Building Becker's regenerative current using the light in Costa Rica Dr. Brandon Crawford: "I've always had primary hypothyroid and Hashimoto's. When I was in Costa Rica, and literally every day we were on the beach for hours. We were typically naked or very little clothes on the beach. And then if we weren't on the beach we were running around hiking in the jungle, etc. I went into full remission." […] Dr. Jack Kruse: "I'm glad you brought this up, because this is a beautiful tie-in to the story that you really wanted to talk to me about, which is autism. […] "Hypothyroidism is a preconditioned state. If a woman has it that she's going to have an autistic baby. Why? Did you know that hypothyroidism is associated with demyelination? […] Dr. Jack Kruse: "Absolutely true. There's papers out about it. So, when you're already in a demyelinated state, do you think that your stem cells are not picking up that programming? The answer is yes. Now, here's the other interesting thing is T3 is needed for neurologic function in humans. "What's the other big link is everybody that has hypothyroidism has a huge problem handling iron. Wow. Now doesn't that begin to fit with what we just talked about autism? "Remember, this is a totally different disease, and now you just brought this in. The reason I'm glad you did this because this is the spectrum of chronic medical conditions. When you improve this, you can avoid the autism. Why? Because can you give a kid an injection if they have proper neurulation? Yes. I know this is going to offend many kids and families that have autism. It's true. "There are kids out there that took all these jabs and didn't get it, and the reason why is because the process in them wasn't broken. But I can tell you that number is really, really small. Back in the 70s, 80s the number was huge. Now it's changed. Why? Because our environment now is filled with blue light. Our environment is filled with all the things that Becker warned us about. So what does that do? it's fundamentally changed the oxidation state of iron. "[…] My Robins Pathology book from 1986 that's right on that shelf, in that book there's a line in a paragraph that says that Hashimoto's thyroiditis is extremely rare cause of hypothyroidism. This is 1986! Today, it's the number one cause of thyroid disease. "You have to realize that hypothyroidism and autism should be discussed all the time. The fact that you brought it up is a beautiful thing, because it explains exactly what I'm trying to share with you. The lack of control of oxygen is tied to the bad biophysics of iron. And it turns out hypothyroidism is one of the key things to study to understand truly what's happening with people and kids that have autism. And you'll begin to find out that that alters their metabolic rate. I think you know this that anybody who's got hypothyroidism has a different metabolic rate. What does that mean in the decentralized framework that I just talked to you about? It means that the UPE frequency and spectra is different. So it's not the same. "So why would you ever expect anybody to not have a problem from an epigenetic standpoint who's got this disease? And the reason I love what you just said is because you just proved my point, that if you go to a place like Costa Rica at the 9th north latitude, you're constantly around UV and IR light which does what? Renovates the heme proteins and makes POMC and α-MSH. You just built Becker's regenerative current. So what did you do? "You fixed this problem completely. And you did it with light. No, you didn't do it with anything else at all. In other words, this is offensive to the big pharma answer, because they don't want to hear this story, Brandon. They don't want Brandon and Uncle Jack talking about this and they certainly do not want us talking about this when we're talking about autism." Dr. Jack Kruse with Dr. Brandon Crawford @ 52:14–56:49 (posted 2025-06-06)

Type 1 diabetes rates by latitude. Multiple Sclerosis prevalence by latitude. UV light strength. Our bodies run at a deficit without sun Cameron Borg: "Now I want to show you some of my favorite statistics ever. This is the association between UVB radiation, vitamin D status, and incidence of type 1 diabetes, so autoimmune diabetes. "Now this is the most perfect depiction of the effects of high energy photons on disease processes. So you can see where it's at the lowest we're on the Equator, so zero. The further away you get from the equator, either south or north, the more you get type 1 diabetes in the population. "Now to my knowledge, this hasn't been settled, but it looks to be not a vitamin D-dependent process. So again, if you give people vitamin D supplements it doesn't prevent them from getting type 1 diabetes. So again, there's something else about the sun that is providing protection from these types of conditions. "This is multiple sclerosis risk plotted by latitude. Again, we see all there's essentially no MS on the equator it doesn't exist. It's actually quite remarkable the associations that you get here. It's clear as day. And this is known for sure that this is not a vitamin D-dependent process. The studies have been done. This has nothing to do with vitamin D. There is something else about UV light that is preventing the incidence of MS when you get closer to the Equator. "Unfortunately vitamin D research has monopolized the research into the effects of sunlight. Everyone just thinks everything has to do with vitamin D. It's not. And unfortunately so much has gone into vitamin D when I again it's just such a narrow slice of what's actually happening. And we know that MS is not a vitamin D-dependent incidence. It has to do with something else that's going on with UV light, and we don't know what that is. Unfortunately, we're probably not even looking in the right places because vitamin D research takes all the funding money. […] "But you know this begs the question could our mass migration indoors over the last century be a primary contributor to chronic disease? I'm going to try and paint the picture that I think it is. So all life evolved with the _expectation_, I think that word is really important, our biological system expects that sunlight and the energy therein is available to use every single day. Every single day. Whether it's cloudy, most of that light is coming through the clouds, but we can't see it. So our bodies have specifically evolved expecting that that's there, because why wouldn't it evolve to expect that that light's going to be there. But when we move inside, and we live inside all days, those expectations are not met. And when those expectations are not met the body runs at a deficit, and that's just the way it is. There's really no way around that." Cameron Borg @ 20:58–24:21 (posted 2025-01-17)

Why some OLED phones are causing eye strain and headaches Tristan Scott: "Yeah. We're releasing a flicker in-depth guide article next week. […] Basically, the way that we control brightness on modern electronic devices […] is by switching the LED on and off at varying rates. "So, if you want a super low brightness screen output in terms of luminance, it's actually just going to be off for longer. So, instead of it being lower current, you're just switching on and off, on and off, and at low brightness, the off time is increased. It's called pulse-width modulation. […] We used to use them in our chip designs and now I'm like, 'Oh, that's how they control LEDs as well. That's terrible.' And my concussion and the symptoms I get, I always was so much more sensitive to my phone. And I thought it was the light. I thought it was the form factor. "But I recently switched to an iPhone 11, which is the last iPhone that doesn't use PWM, because it's a LCD display instead of an OLED display. […] It just uses DC dimming, which is actually changing the voltage of the current across the diode. And I can actually look at my phone like all day now. I mean, it's not ideal. I still get like sucked in, and the form factor is not great. "But I now look at my iPhone 13 and I get a headache in 5 minutes. […] And the reason why your phone feels so much worse than everything else, if you have a iPhone 12 or later, […] they're switching at like 240 Hz or 480 Hz typically if they're OLED, like newer iPhones, Google Pixel, and the lower the frequency is, the actually worse it is, because it's still above where your brain can perceive it visually, but it feels it, regardless of being able to see it. "They have quite literally an index. The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, IEEE, this is not some like woo woo thing. It's agreed upon that flickering LEDs causes eye strain. It causes migraines, headaches, aggravates symptoms in ASD children, panic attacks, anxiety. This is like it's not a debate. This has been written and agreed upon in the engineering literature. They have something called a flicker index. […] "The iPhone SE was another one that people loved because it was like basic and more friendly on the eyes. And then they just discontinued it. Even though people in many forums have said like, 'Don't get rid of your only like DC dimming line that's left.' There's other phone companies in Asia coming out that are specifically higher PWM frequencies to be more eye friendly. So it's not like this isn't known." npub1yd2h2lrwchshvm46jq7auh65tjkxmgnapkavh7tjtqq07kknupxsa980tv with Dr. Alexis Cowan @ 01:19:28–01:22:55 & 01:24:33–01:24:58 (posted 2025-07-07)

Six-fold rise in melanoma diagnosis over last 40 years. Overdiagnosis. No prize for missing one. Drive for revenue maximization. An epidemic created by dermatologists Richard Weller: "Now there's a difference in melanoma diagnosis and melanoma death. Melanoma death is a very robust endpoint. You've had a serious melanoma, it is fatal. […] Adewole Adamson, an American dermatologist down in Texas, had a paper in the New England Journal about two years ago where he looked at […] the number of melanomas, predominantly superficial spreading melanomas, diagnosed in America now are six times as many as there were 40 years ago, so a six-fold rise. […] "He finds there's no correlation whatsoever between how much sunlight there is where you live and your risk of melanoma. But he finds there is an absolutely tight, straight-line relationship between access to a dermatologist, how many dermatologists there are, how many biopsies are done. Basically it's overdiagnosis. "They took microscope slides from 40 years ago which had been some diagnosed as melanoma, some diagnosed as funny mole, dysplastic nevus, not melanoma, and put them in front of pathologists today. And a significant number of those biopsies that were diagnosed as not a melanoma 40 years ago were diagnosed as melanoma when being looked at pathologist by now. […] "The problem with diagnosis of melanoma is it is dermatologist looks at it saying, 'Yeah, it looks like a melanoma.' That's it. Pathologist, you do a biopsy, put it on a slide. Pathologist looks at it and goes, 'Yeah, looks like a melanoma.' So the whole thing is based on an impression. […] "The other thing about melanoma diagnosis there are no prizes for missing one. If you say, 'It looks like a funny mole,' and it turns out to be melanoma and it kills them, that is the end of your career, or it's a very expensive mistake. If you say, and it is a harmless mole, 'Oh, it's a melanoma,' and you cut it out, you then have an incredibly grateful patient. 'My god, I had a melanoma. My life has been saved!' even if the reality of the matter is they never had a melanoma, it was just a mole, it was never going to do anything. So the whole diagnostic shift, it's not malicious, but it's moving one one way. "Where it is wrong is in America. There's been a big commercial change in melanoma practice in the last 40 years. In the US, venture capitalists have bought up dermatology practices, and they have bought up pathologists, and they've said revenue maximization now, so I want dermatologists to do more biopsies, a chargeable event, to feed biopsies to pathologists, a chargeable event, who can feed diagnosis. . . So there's been this financial pressure for dermatologists to do more, see more, do more biopsies. […] "There has been no change in deaths. […] I don't think dermatologists are chasing an epidemic; I think there is a strong chance here that dermatologists are creating an epidemic. I think overdiagnosis to me strikes me as a much more likely than factors we haven't considered leading to more melanoma. I don't think we've necessarily got more melanoma." Prof. Richard Weller with Max Gulhane, MD @ 56:00–01:01:54 (posted 2024-03-02)

The American Academy of Pediatrics is really a big pharma lobbyist, money laundering, influence laundering, scheme and scam Robert Barnes: "The American Academy of Pediatrics, well, is supposed to be representing children's doctors in America, has become a captive tool of big pharma. They've been receiving, now they are, for example, right now suing Robert Kennedy to try to force parents to have to give certain vaccines, so-called vaccines, to their children against their informed consent. "Robert Kennedy is saying that should not be done against their informed consent and is not recommending it for the COVID vaccine for children, unless the child is uniquely vulnerable to COVID, because it is seen as having more risk than reward based on the available data, including over 180 scientific and medical studies on the subject. "AAP is suing him to try to force it back in. And that is because, in part, the AAP is really a big pharma lobbyist in disguise. And what shocked some people is that they get money from the government, state and federal government, is being given money to then turn around and lobby the government on behalf of big pharma. Elon Musk called this the George Soros scam. He goes, what it is, is you figure out you can bribe a government official to give you a hundred X rate of your bribe, and then you can turn around and use that to lobby everybody else on government at scale. And he goes, you know, it is a money laundering, influence laundering, scheme and scam. And that is what appears to me, the AAP is also doing." Robert Barnes with Viva Frei @ 01:23:38%%01:25:03 (posted 2025-08-17) https://rumble.com/v6xp9ue-ep.-277-russia-peace-talks-trump-d.c.-takeover-leads-to-lawsuit-heat-wave-l.html?start=5018

The problems with epidemiology. You just can't peanut butter everything into a normal distribution John Beaudoin: "They try to put everything in a unimodal, uh, one mode. Everybody knows what a bell curve is, right? One mode. So the way I explain part of the problems with epidemiologists is they talk about p-values and confidence intervals. It's all based on a bell curve and a normal distribution. "Male cancers I use as an example. Right? Testicular cancer, mean age is 30. You get it from like 18 to 40. You're not going to get it after 40. That's testicular. "Prostate cancer, you're not going to even look at it until 50, and even then it's very few. It goes up with age. "You have two different modes [holds up both hands], a mean of 30 [holds up only left hand] and a mean of, say, 70 [holds up right hand]. And in between there, 40 to 50, there's a very low probability you're going to have either one. But if you take all the data, you throw it in a pool and you say, 'Give me the mean,' which is generally the most likely that is going to occur, and say, 'Oh, it's 50. Male cancer is 50.' Like, no, that's very low probability of either one because you've got a bimodal distribution [holds up both hands]. "These are the problems with epidemiology, where they don't look at confounding variables, they don't look at multiple things like that, and probability distribution functions. You just can't peanut butter everything into a normal distribution. It's wrong." John Beaudoin with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny @ 59:39–01:01:04 (streamed 2025-06-02) https://rumble.com/v6u61ln-this-week-with-dr.t-with-special-guest-john-beaudoin.html?start=3579