That’s the thing about quantum gates, about quantum entanglements…
they are reversible
In every timeline I have found him, in every timeline he has recognized me and vice versa
If even one single UTXO is frozen, burned, confiscated, or -a more appropriate term- stolen as a result of a BIP and, post seizure, a person can produce the rightful keys to claim even one of those UTXOs
It should be within that persons rights to sue in civil court and/or press criminal charges on the individuals who were participatory in that outcome
If the quantum gates (that the quantum circuits are dependent on) are not inherently reversible on the device, then you do not have a quantum computer- you do not even have a quantum simulator
You have a noisy classical simulator
In order to have fault tolerant design that creates reversible quantum gates (and thus the quantum circuits required for Shors), you need a massive number of logical quibits (which introduces hardware constraints/resource demands)
Even IF you can overcome the resource demands, THEN you run into what I like to call the moat…
Ask any physicist or biologist that has gotten deep enough into the rabbit hole and they will tell you that they have run into their version of “the moat”
The moat is when there seems to be some “barrier” that reverts you right back to square one
In quantum systems, this is the paradox that you need HIGH number of logical qubits to scale a fault tolerant design BUT PARADOXICALLY the higher the number of qubits that you “gather” the more decoherence or “crosstalk” between local qubits you introduce- this results in greater error
Quantum Computers (in order to run Shors) would need a high fidelity output, >99.9999% accuracy
This is why QC has NEVER scaled in any meaningful way