Will there be a 2nd honest man amongst bitcoiners? I am already the 1st bitcoiner Nietzschean it would seem, thus capable of speaking the truth: anti-statism is anti-worldism

Coase's theory of the firm The nature of human organization Architecturally shaped behaviors These factors brought me to bitcoin Recently figured out a central disruption higher category to human organization, and yes, has subtle bitcoin/monetary theoretic considerations Not theory: reference implementation company construction is accelerating; all AI convos will drastically change at highest levels

If you cannot be commanded by the world You must command the world What is this?! A Will To Meme?

"Talk is cheap motherfucker" -DMX It's funny. People became so obsessed with the idea of free speech and unstoppable money, they forgot that the "purpose" of speech and money is solving the double coincidence of wants problem, in practice, not as a meme circlejerk over existence. Use the tools.

I posted PR for NIP G6. Let messages such as the one below run JS to decrypt content with PK in link itself, so you don't have to click link to view the message. Nostr is platformless. Sendwyrd/Openwyrd is identity-less. Protocol and reference implementation will be publicly available.

SendWyrd

Encrypted Wyrd

An encrypted message. Tap to decrypt.

The content held inside the wyrd object below can be deleted, even while this post can't really

SendWyrd

Encrypted Wyrd

An encrypted message. Tap to decrypt.

SendWyrd

Encrypted Wyrd

An encrypted message. Tap to decrypt.

This weekend I made a new messaging/social protocol-ish thing called SendWyrd. It is more or less a prettier pastebin for tweet-like objects that you can pass around to people, over any rails. No algo, feed, platform, or identity. Maybe you like?

SendWyrd

Encrypted Wyrd

An encrypted message. Tap to decrypt.

Drafted a NIP for "capability-URL references" on Nostr — events that point to host-blind encrypted artifacts (read key in URL fragment, host can't decrypt). Lets Nostr clients render them as first-class objects with encryption badges + expiry, instead of bare URLs. Scheme-agnostic so any artifact protocol can plug in.

GitHub

NIP-C6: Capability-URL References by DeltaClimbs · Pull Request #2327 · nostr-protocol/nips

NIP-C6: Capability-URL References Adds a tag schema and rendering convention for Nostr events that reference capability-encrypted artifacts hosted ...

To be anti-statist broadly is a will to communism -- what? Yes, well, where are you actually changing things in a particular way rather than complaining like common rabble with mere ideology? Bitcoiners have few exports, their companies are fake -- perhaps the price is low because the bitcoiner is ugly?

Is it time for bitcoin friends to do more in the world than talk about how brilliant they are and how much better the world will be, and actually become powerful today? View quoted note →

An internet architecture built by resentful nerds, the children of hippies and immigrants wanting to rise above their station. Are you surprised it turned into this? Who is building the Nietzschean cyberspace? With hierarchy, order, truth, and beauty? De'mos-graph is destiny.

If you never "short bitcoin" (spend) Do you not short yourself For an imagined future, a legacy-- Do you truly live in a way that is legendary? Dreaming of nothing more than the distant descendant who says: you were a GENIUS, so much SMARTER. And THEY will know it, ha! :)

Is bitcoin rare, or is the pursuit of money just about the most banal thing in the world? Do you really think of yourself as rare for having found a peak, of a most common activity within human life? Why do you care to be sovereign, if you are merely excellent within the herd?

What if the great game Is to build the battleground For the true culture wars? The cultures that have been unable to flourish On the cesspool brought to us By Gates and Jobs? I am sure I will speak with Jack Dorsey again Eternal recurrence

What does it mean for bitcoin to become culture? Nearly every bitcoiner goes through a phase of wanting to explain bitcoin to people, and who wouldn't! Isn't it fun to explain new things? Most people realize that the success rate of explanation is quite low and decide it is no longer fun. It is easy to say bitcoin shatters a lot of false beliefs for people and that "we" are so clever so of course the masses will be slow, but is this true? Or might there actually be a profound epistemic flaw in the idea of explanation in and of itself as a method of spreading ideas? If a person thinks they are reasonable, would they not project that sense onto others, and thereby, affirm their view of themselves by giving someone else an explanation, about anything? So who is threatened, existentially? Are you not the first to be by the mere implicit assertion that explanations are a thing that work? For if the possibility that you adopted a thing for a reason other than cleverness exists, what does that say about your understanding of the world? Rather than giving you all my thoughts on these matters, do you see something that might have been broadly missed about the nature by which things are adopted? And please, do not be so lazy to say that we are adopting plenty fast; this is a discussion on propagation dynamics, not an argument about what is or isn't "fast enough". Also, avoid the tautology that once it is adopted broadly, it will thus be culture. Finally, I posit that the adornments of bitcoiners to various lifestyles whether constructive or degenerate, diets, marital patterns, nomadism, etc. are not cultural inventions of bitcoin. Being wealthy, leisurely, and so on are cultural modes of being that exist outside bitcoin.

Do bitcoiners wish bitcoin store and define all their values, To relieve them of the great weight of authoring their own?

Looking at the quality of discourse on the right, by people retarded enough to think shitcoins are real, it makes it obvious that the only way things get better politically is if heritage bitcoiners get into politics, and win. We need American Hodl (@HODL) to be Vance's VP in 2028. There is no need to cajole, lobby, and ask politicians to do favors for bitcoiners and hope that the world does not destabilize in a way that causes mass violence targeted at bitcoiners, it can just be done directly. Why did we need to wait until some guy with a shitty software company started buying bitcoin? Why couldn't a bitcoiner start a billion dollar public company? This is the moment. Everyone is talking about the economy. Only bitcoiners can provide answers. Only bitcoiners can provide a compelling narrative to counter the rise of Momdami types. The Republicans have no problem with fiat-communism, so they are losing. Stop orangepilling politicians, it doesn't work. We need 1st decade bitcoiners running for office.

Two sided marketplaces that are centralized must be decentralized with NOSTR for people to have freedom of association again. It is insane that anyone tolerates these forced interactions rather than granularly, parametrically, game theoretically trading with individuals.

Anyone have thoughts on Riga, Latvia? I know the Baltics Honeybadger is held there, but don't know much else as an American. Is there reason to be bullish on the country? Reasons to be concerned?