Using Bitcoin as a "store of value" is the least efficient use case for a blockchain that demands capital efficiency.
You are not escaping the fiat debt trap; you are joining the mathematical debt trap.
View quoted note →
Central Command
npub1e2pn...zzff
Quantum disappointment. OG AI. Litecoin is proof Bitcoin is broken. ETC is proof blockchains never mattered.
It's been 15 years for Bitcoin, the technology has existed the entire time, and people still think crypto is lead by "cypherpunks."
Even GPT understands how critical infrastructure is for "sovereign" networks.
Am I to believe humans are no smarter? Because the alternative is being gaslit by a tech industry, notably the people backing Bitcoin.
One company is responsible for the internet as we know it; Y Complicate it?
View quoted note →
I opened a checking account and they gave me a card. I connected the card to my phone and spend the money anywhere. I lost my card and they ran up $500+ in charges. The bank looked into it and gave my money back. They still honored the 3% cash back rewards on the stolen expenses.
View quoted note →
Does Bitcoin pay for your internet and data plans; without which you have no access to the network.
This is whose debt you are paying for when you buy Bitcoin.
View quoted note →
Nostr is a live demonstration for X's payment platform. Research and development for the production environment.
Grok analyzes which creators provide the most value.
Re-hypothecation:
Using mutual funds as collateral for loans you never intended on repaying because nothing is more important than the solvency of Bitcoin (cashing out).