Bitcoin hates CBDCs because it removes agency from the network. You can have millions in digital liquidity that can't be withdrawn. Not to suggest the value is locked in, when it never existed.

Bitcoin's security is not governed by hashrate, but consensus, which is a product of the underlying network's topology.

Using blockchains as collateral is just the reminder that you're buying someone else's debt.

Real world assets don't add value to a network. These assets always existed; their value is independent from the blockchains they occupy.

Shorting crypto is fast money. It's just math.

TRX boast a multibillion marketcap, nearing the likes of TTWO. Name a single game or application without looking. Where's the side they're not talking about in Western media for this? #asknostr

Take profits, be weak. Institutions are selling covered calls either way. They have more money than you.

ChatGPT is less than 4 years old, and institutions have completely reorganized around it. Bitcoin was released 17 years ago; do you even remember 17 years ago? Because people are still asking, "what's Bitcoin?" That's the difference between a revolutionary innovation and the token pipe dreams of a developer conference. You're going to use the institutional rails, because it's the only choice you have; as it always has been, so it will be.

If Bitcoin was money, why do they need ramps? #asknostr

Why are all these crypto firms buying traditional stocks? #asknostr Silently admitting who has the better network.