View quoted note →

You’d never put a cell tower in your baby’s room… but what if you already did? …a wireless baby monitor placed at 1 meter from the crib can expose the baby to the SAME LEVEL of RF radiation as if there were a cell tower 50–100 meters away..

I’ve never seen electromagnetic fields described in a way that makes more sense

All non-native non-ionising man-made EMF i.e. - Microwave frequency - Radio frequency - Dirty electricity - AC Magnetic - AC Electric - Blue light - Flicker irrespective of their frequency cause harm below our level of perception through mechanisms other than the thermal effects which everyone keeps referring to when they say "it doesn't have enough energy" The key here is to understand that the mechanism of damage with non-ionising radiation is different from the ionising radiations. via mechanisms like calcium efflux, intracellular dehydration and increased permeability of the BBB. Allan Frey in 1960s figured out the link between weakening of Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) & EMF exposure allowing toxins to enter the brain Perhaps the next question we should ask is If the blood-brain barrier is vulnerable to serious and on-going damage from wireless exposures, then what about The blood-ocular barrier (that protects the eyes) The blood-placenta barrier (that protects the developing fetus) The blood-gut barrier (which ensures proper digestion and nutrition) The blood-testes barrier (that protects developing sperm) to see if they too can be damaged by these wireless radiations? and if you read report from 29 independent scientists & health experts from around the world who put down an indepth report called "The Bioinitiative Report 2012" with over 1800+ studies showing bioeffects and adverse health effects of EMF from wires (powerlines, electrical wiring, appliances and hand-held devices) and wireless EMF (cell and cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI, wireless laptops, wireless routers, baby monitors, surveillance systems, wireless utility meters smart meters, etc.) When you look at the data, You will quickly see that when telecom industry funds EMF research ↪ 68% of research showed no effects ↪ Only 32% showed harmful effects When there was no money from the wireless industry ↪ 70% of studies showed harm ↪ 30% showed no effects And that funding bias is not a coincidence, it is how they play this game. If you want to control the narrative, you do not need to control the physics You just need to control the studies people hear about. Telecom companies will proudly say “Look, most studies show no harm” while quietly forgetting to mention that they paid for a big chunk of the “no harm” pile. Now zoom out for a moment We already know: - The mechanism of injury for non ionising EMF is not about breaking DNA directly like X rays or gamma rays - It is about disrupting biology - Messing with signalling - Messing with voltage gated calcium channels - Messing with membranes and water structure - Messing with barriers that are supposed to stay tightly sealed Once you accept that the thermal argument is outdated you suddenly see why so many different systems can be affected Sleep Mood Fertility Cardiovascular system Blood sugar control Neurodegeneration They are all deeply electrical and deeply dependent on timing and membrane integrity. Now come back to those barriers If EMF can weaken the blood brain barrier Why would we assume the blood ocular barrier is magically immune when the eye is basically an exposed extension of the brain Why would we assume the blood testes barrier is perfectly safe when sperm development is already known to be extremely heat and stress sensitive Why would we assume the blood placenta barrier is untouchable when it sits between a rapidly developing nervous system and a world full of signals we never evolved with We have built a civilization that is basically soaking every barrier in chronic fields and then acting surprised when we see - Exploding infertility rates - Earlier and earlier vision problems in kids - Neurodevelopmental disorders - Gut issues and “mystery” inflammation everywhere Instead of asking “What tiny narrow outcome does this one short study show under these carefully controlled artificial conditions” We should be asking What happens when you stack - A cell tower 50 meters away - WiFi in every room - Bluetooth in your ears - A phone in your pocket - Smart meter on the wall - Dirty electricity on the wiring - LED & screen blue light in your eyes till midnight Every single day for decades starting in the womb. That is the real experiment And NONE of us consented to it. View quoted note →

Bring Back Men’s Satchel. Not for FASHION. But for SURVIVAL. When your phone is in your pocket, It is effectively 0mm from your skin. Put it in a satchel and you gain at least 2-3cm of distance. Thanks to the Inverse Square Law, Going from 0mm to 2cm cuts the intensity by more than 10x That small gap creates a massive drop in the wireless RF radiation your body absorbs. Get the cellphone out of your pocket. Get a Bag. Let’s Make Men's Satchel Great Again!

Daylight savings is in your hands. Literally!

We’ve lost another EMF warrior DAVE STETZER. The man who created the first Dirty electricity Filters. Dave wasn’t just a brilliant engineer, he was the guy who actually listened when people said their homes were making them sick. While the rest of the world was ignoring DIRTY ELECTRICITY, Dave was out there measuring it, explaining it & building the Stetzerizer filters to fix it. He was a straight shooter who genuinely cared about helping people feel better. We all owes him a huge debt of gratitude. Rest easy, Dave. You’ll be missed.

for me 1 sat = $1 maybe im living in the future 🤫

isn't it crazy that in 2025, the only time you're not exposed to artificial electromagnetic fields is when you're in a water body?

LETS FUCKIN GOOOOOO! View quoted note →

You can never have a sound sleep in a high RF environment Because how do you expect your brain to rest when it’s busy dodging invisible modulated man-made RF radiation all night? Start with your cellphone off and in another room, WiFi router unplugged, No electronic watch/clock/items in the bedroom, non-metallic bed 2 meters from the walls. Make your bedroom a dead zone for technology. You don’t need none of that tech while sleeping.

NEVER FORGET The same folks playing with electricity, lasers, sound waves and magnets to tap your nervous system are the ones telling you your phone glued to your skull is PERFECTLY FINE Published: 06 Oct 2015

Shooting pictures for my blue light blocking glasses. They block all the way upto 550nm. 100% blue light blocked. 99% green light blocked.

Never miss a sunrise or set FREE PURE IR THERAPY

I see @lnvpn@`LN⚡️VPN - eSIM & VPN ` as one of the most important privacy enhancing service to exist on the internet

Our eyes hold the highest Melatonin levels, meaning the best way to “supplement” it is through what you see, not what you buy

Do EMF shielding clothing work? When voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) are activated by nnEMF exposure, it’s easy to think that simply blocking those channels will solve the problem. But that only offers short-term relief. The body doesn’t open those channels for no reason, it’s reacting to stress. This activation is part of a deeper biological response, a signal that the system is under pressure. If the stressor remains, the body will keep reacting, no matter how many channels are blocked. So while VGCC blockers can temporarily reduce symptoms, they don’t address the root cause.. the continuous environmental & physiological stress coming from EMF exposure itself. In the same way, Shielding clothing shouldn’t be seen as a real solution. It’s more like protective armour.. useful for limiting damage when you have to enter areas with strong electromagnetic radiation, but not something to depend on daily as a fix. The real goal should be restoring balance: reducing exposure, supporting cellular repair and helping the body recover its natural resilience. Ultimately, blocking channels or wearing shielding gear are short-term strategies. Do they work? Yes. Do they fix the problem? Not really. They help you buy TIME. The real issue is the constant stress your body is under from artificial electromagnetic exposure. You can’t truly recover if the stressor is always there.

When the TELECOM industry funds EMF research ↪ 68% of research showed no effects ↪ Only 32% showed harmful effects When there was no money from the wireless industry ↪ 70% of studies showed harm ↪ 30% showed no effects Now the question is.. Can we rely on wireless industry & it's associates to set the EMF exposure standards for us, our kids, our families? IT’S 2025. Guidelines haven’t changed since 1996. Do the math. View quoted note →