david's avatar
david
david@bitcoinpark.com
npub1u5nj...ldq3
epileptologist and freedom tech maxi Co-Founder @ NosFabrica 🍇 Grapevine, 🧠⚡️Brainstorm, Tapestry
david's avatar
straycat 6 months ago
WoT algos and scores should follow these principles: 1. personalized (not global) 2. portable (calculated by a service provider, not a client) 3. user choice (easy to switch providers) 4. private (platform doesn’t know which SP is providing scores) Agree or not? If agree - how to achieve?
david's avatar
straycat 7 months ago
What are the big picture, WoT-related topics, questions, issues that are on people’s minds? Off the top of my head, here are a few: 1. Where should the trust signal come from? Follows, engagements, attestations, something else? 2. What are the different categories of trust? (And who decides what those categories are?) 3. Is it possible — or even desirable, under any circumstances — for standards, protocols, ontologies, etc to be created and actively managed in the absence of a designated maintainer, committee, etc? If so, how? 4. What are the different ways we should communicate scores from WoT Service Providers to nostr clients? 5. What WoT tools and features are needed before we can attract normies to nostr? WoT scores that are personalized, portable, contextual … what else? 6. How do we make WoT scores contextual? 7. How do we convey confidence in any given WoT score? 8. How can we monetize WoT? 9. How do we empower users to “choose your own algorithm”? And here are two we discussed on our weekly #wotathon call last week: 1. Is WoT leading us towards a Black Mirror dystopia? 2. Is it OK to attach a number to trust? Why or why not? What other questions can you think of? We want to hear from you! cc: @nosfabrica
david's avatar
straycat 7 months ago
Fiat: algos are hidden 🙈👎🏻 Freedom tech: algos are out in plain sight 😄👏🏻 How can we choose our algos if we have no idea how they work?