Reclaim The Net's avatar
Reclaim The Net
Reclaim_The_Net@reclaimthenet.org
npub1ukq5...s4c6
Free expression. Digital rights. Privacy. Media bias. News and solutions.
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
The Supreme Court just declined to hear Children’s Health Defense’s case accusing Meta of working with the government to silence dissent on vaccines and COVID. No review, no comment. CHD said this was about free speech, not just their speech. It was about the right of the public to hear views the government doesn’t like. They argued Meta didn’t act independently but as a tool of government pressure. The 9th Circuit disagreed, calling it private policy. The Supreme Court won’t weigh in. The timing is wild. The day after CHD petitioned SCOTUS, Zuckerberg killed Meta’s fact-checking program. That was the same tool used to justify censoring CHD...
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
Denmark is about to set fire to digital free expression. A sweeping new law is on the way to outlaw sharing deepfakes, AI-generated images, videos or audio that mimic real people. The government claims it is a safeguard against misinformation but a heavy-handed crackdown could threaten parody, satire, art and political speech...
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
Big Tech’s dance with the EU’s “anti-disinformation” rules is entering dangerous territory. A new report from the European Digital Media Observatory slams Google, Meta, Microsoft, and TikTok for not doing enough to police speech, demanding more censorship disguised as transparency.
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
A bombshell House Judiciary report just dropped: and it lays bare a quiet, coordinated assault on American speech. The story: GARM, a group of mega-advertisers controlling ~90% of global ad spend, didn’t only police ads. They acted as a censorship cartel, colluding with foreign governments (yes, including the EU and Australia) to choke lawful speech they didn’t like. GARM’s leaders called President Trump’s speech a “contagion” to be contained... image
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
🚨 A Senate bill meant to protect teens’ privacy online could erode privacy for everyone. The new COPPA 2.0 (S.836) expands protections for kids under 17: but to enforce it, platforms will need to identify who’s underage. The standard shifts from “actual knowledge” to “knowledge fairly implied,” a foggy legal phrase that pressures platforms into preemptive surveillance of all users. To play it safe, websites will likely roll out sweeping age checks: facial scans, ID uploads, behavioral profiling. These systems will target teens, but catch everyone. Expect more uploads of government IDs, more biometric scans, more data hoarding with zero national guardrails. And still no federal privacy law.
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
A new push for public power to challenge court sentences is gaining steam in UK Parliament, sparked by the case of Lucy Connolly, jailed for a social media post. Reform UK’s Richard Tice is championing "Lucy’s Bill," which would allow citizens to petition the Criminal Cases Review Commission if they believe a punishment is unjust. After 500 signatures, the case could be reviewed and even sent to the Court of Appeal.
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
The UK government is quietly pushing a major expansion of state surveillance powers, and almost no one is paying attention. Buried in new amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill is a proposal (NC63) that would let senior officers access online accounts, email, cloud storage, social media, without a warrant, so long as the device used to access them has been lawfully seized. No judge. No independent oversight. Just internal sign-off.
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
Media Matters is suing the FTC, claiming the agency’s investigation into its role in the X advertiser boycott is political retaliation. In 2023, Media Matters ran a campaign highlighting that ads from major brands were appearing next to neo-Nazi content on X. The result was a flood of advertiser exits, and lawsuits from Musk accusing the group of deliberately misleading the public to tank the platform's revenue. Now the FTC wants to know: was this just reporting, or did Media Matters coordinate behind the scenes, like others did, with other advocacy groups to orchestrate an economic hit job? Media Matters denies any wrongdoing.
Reclaim The Net's avatar
reclaimthenet 8 months ago
Canada’s Bill C‑2, the "Strong Borders Act," is a privacy demolition job wrapped in national security branding. If passed, the bill would give police, intelligence, and federal enforcers the power to demand detailed personal info from any service provider; hotels, clinics, internet companies, your dry cleaner, without a warrant. Officials wouldn’t need evidence, just a vague suspicion of a federal law violation. And providers can’t tell you they were asked. They have five days to challenge the order, or they’re legally gagged... image