ZeroHedge News (RSS Feed)'s avatar
ZeroHedge News (RSS Feed)
cms.zerohedge.com_fullrss2.xml@atomstr.data.haus
npub1ax4n...yydz
https://www.zerohedge.com
Escalation: Iran, Russia, China To Hold Naval Drill In Flashpoint Strait Of Hormuz Escalation: Iran, Russia, China To Hold Naval Drill In Flashpoint Strait Of Hormuz Are Russia and China finally standing up to America's addiction to regime change wars in the Middle East? They appear to at least be flashing some muscle in this incredibly tense moment, as the US deploys no less than two nuclear-powered aircraft carriers to the region. Russia, China, and Iran have deployed naval vessels to the Strait of Hormuz for joint exercises this week, Russian presidential aide Nikolay Patrushev announced Tuesday, according to Anadolu and https://en.mehrnews.com/news/241865/Iran-Russia-China-to-hold-drill-in-Strait-of-Hormuz . This comes as Iran's elite IRGC Navy is already in day two of military drills in the vital oil transit point, having closed some sectors of the chokepoint. image In a fresh interview with Turkish media, Patrushev said Moscow is advancing a "multipolar world order on the oceans" to counter what he blasted as Western hegemony. "We will tap into the potential of BRICS, which should now be given a full-fledged strategic maritime dimension," he said. These fresh mid-February drills are being called Maritime Security Belt 2026. It turns out Russian and Chinese warships have already been in the region as part of prior Iran-hosted drills, and without doubt they've lingered to keep a very close eye on developments after President Trump started threatening Tehran over its nuclear as well as ballistic missiles programs. Also coming off last month's BRICS naval drills in South Africa which were dubbed "Will for Peace 2026" - Chinese, Russian, and Iranian ships have in recent years showed deepened coordination and cooperation, in an increased number of joint drills. "The Maritime Security Belt 2026 exercises in the Strait of Hormuz, where Russia, China, and Iran sent their ships, proved to be relevant," he added. If the US were to launch a 'surprise' attack on Iran, it remains unlikely that either Russia or China would come to Tehran's direct aid and engage militarily with Washington. However, it's possible more Chinese and Russian ships would be sent to patrol flashpoint waters, making things more delicate and difficult in terms of US Navy maneuvering and firing. image Likely Moscow and Beijing would team up to issue a UN Security Council condemnation, and would seek to rally the globe against another Iraq-style war in the Middle East, with likely disastrous consequences for the whole region. The second round of Iran-US talks wrapped up Tuesday in Geneva with mixed results. The Iranians have said the sides could be headed toward a new deal, and yet diplomats have admitted it was a heavy, and not very positive or amicable atmosphere. So things remain ultra-tense and charged, to say the least. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 16:40 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/escalation-iran-russia-china-hold-naval-drill-flashpoint-strait-hormuz
The Crowdsourcing Of Cutting Waste & Fraud The Crowdsourcing Of Cutting Waste & Fraud The Trump administration came into office with a pledge to uproot waste, fraud, and abuse within the government’s system of transfer payments. Leading the charge would be Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). image They began their work early on with earnest and passion, starting inauguration evening, with many long days and nights of data crunching and number slinging, under the assumption that auditing government would be similar to auditing a private company. DOGE quickly found itself buried and overwhelmed. There were too many programs, too much leakage, no coordination between departments, strange sources of incoming and outgoing payments, shadowy institutions and names flying everywhere, and eye-popping levels of inefficiency. It became obvious that many decades had gone by without any scrupulous concern for how taxpayer dollars were used. After months on the job, DOGE backed away from the big picture job and embedded itself in specific agencies with more focus and less in the way of press releases. Elon went back to his enterprises which had been suffering with his absence and distractions. Meanwhile, his small cadre of data mavens stayed on and got to work, agency by agency. This much became clear: the job was too much for them. They had to prioritize their work. It was decided that the most important priority would be to sync up the many random databases strewn here and there and everywhere into large packages that were manageable and could be checked, with lines of spending matching sources and purposes. Nothing like this existed before. Once that was done, it became clear that the datasets were too large for a team of workers. They needed to open source all the data and enlist help from the public. In essence, the problems were just too big to isolate problem spending from legitimate spending. The decision was made to bundle it all up and do waves of file dumps on the public. After all, we live in the age of the citizen researcher, people with fast Internet connections, large machines, high degrees of skill, and a passion to discover. For too long, the affairs of government have lived in a cloud of secrecy, probably for one hundred years or more. The excuse has always been discretion: It wasn’t the public’s business how the money was spent. But this is ridiculous; we are talking about taxpayer dollars. The citizens do in fact have the right to know. The goal of bringing all this out into the open would represent a fundamental change in the operation of public policy. The most elaborate installation yet was just posted on the website of the Department of Health and Human Services, with a focus on Medicaid. This is a program designed to provide needed services to the poor. Annual spending exceeds $1 trillion a year, having entered into new upward slopes of spending in the COVID era where government unleashed the printing presses and spent money as if it were in infinite supply. This one program now accounts for 18 percent of U.S. health care expenditures. Exactly where is all this going? We now have a tool that helps show what is happening. HHS has to help citizens understand the fullness of what is going on. This effort has also involved Scott Bessent at the Department of Treasury. He has announced that anyone who can find fraud and submit the evidence to the website will be given 10 to 30 percent of the fines imposed on the receiving individual or organization. This means giving rewards to intrepid researchers who can find and prove fraud in the program. The efforts will take months or years, simply because there is so much of it. Elon Musk and others have given low estimates of 5 to 10 percent of fraudulent Medicaid spending over the last 10 years, while others say the number is closer to 20 and 30 percent. Figures like $1 trillion are being thrown around as possible numbers on how much has been lost. They could be much higher. As we discovered in the Minnesota case, the fraud can be brazen and undisguised or it can be surreptitious and shape-shifting in order to avoid detection. There are many features of this effort that are fascinating. To my knowledge, this is the first time that a strategy like this has been deployed to clear up the welfare state. It’s probably the largest data dump by government in history. The strategy of enlisting citizen researchers is also new and very brilliant, recalling bounty hunters of the Old West. People are talented and care deeply. Why not use that energy to clean up public spending? The single most striking feature of this data release is that it was covered nowhere in the mainstream press. You might have thought otherwise—that the nation’s press would be all over this—but not so. I kept looking for the headline but they were nowhere to be seen apart from The Epoch Times, Townhall, and a few other venues. There is no question that mainstream media is quite anxious to bury the news. If not for Elon’s X social media app, and The Epoch Times, hardly anyone would even know about this! What’s most fascinating about this is what it reveals about the politics and culture of major media operations. You might think that even left-liberals would be on board with rooting out corruption and abuse within government programs, if only to shore up public confidence in their operations. But, again, as we saw in Minnesota, the dedication from elite circles to silencing all public knowledge of how their money is actually being used seems to be an essential part of their messaging priorities. As a result, one of the most spectacular moves in history to clean up the operations of government has gotten almost no attention outside alternative venues. In the bigger picture, the challenge that the Trump administration took on is larger and grander than anyone knew. The second term hit following the largest explosion of government spending ever recorded, with some $6 trillion -$8 trillion added in the name of public health in a few short years. Overall, total cumulative spending added across the years 2020 to 2025 totals roughly $33 trillion –$34 trillion. I’m profoundly aware that no human mind can even conceive of numbers on that scale. They are simply incomprehensible. Remember too that government has no resources of its own; whatever it has to spend is taken from the public in one form or another: taxes, inflation, or debt paid by future generations. In essence, what we have seen over these years has set new records for profligacy. I noted that after the first few months of DOGE’s work in 2025, a kind of demoralization set in. The problem they had sworn to tackle was just too big for even a great team of researchers. DOGE and the Trump administration deserve maximum credit for their persistence and coming up with a plausible strategy for achieving the goal. It’s a start, in any case, and sets a mighty precedent for the future. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 16:20 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/crowdsourcing-cutting-waste-fraud
Democrats Pile On After Rep. Fine Doubles Down On 'Dogs Over Muslims' Remarks Democrats Pile On After Rep. Fine Doubles Down On 'Dogs Over Muslims' Remarks Democrats are scrambling to condemn Florida Rep. Randy Fine for his unapologetic defense of American pet ownership against radical Islamic demands to ban dogs as “unclean.” image The firestorm erupted after New York Muslim activist Nerdeen Kiswani declared, “Dogs definitely have a place in society, just not as indoor pets. Like we [Muslims have] said all along, they are unclean [“najis”].” Kiswani later claimed, “Lmao at the Zionists frothing at the mouth at this, thinking they’re doing something. It’s obviously a joke I don’t care if you have a dog, I do care if your dog is shitting everywhere and you’re not cleaning it.” In response, Fine laid out the stark choice: “If they force us to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one.” For context, this is the leader of one of the key mainstream Muslim groups that supported Mamdani. — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) Democrats piled on Fine, with Rep. Ro Khanna calling it “Disgusting bigotry” and demanding, “Fine must be censured.” Khanna doubled down: “Taking an alleged comment by one person and attributing it to everyone who shares that person’s faith is the definition of bigotry.” Rep. Dan Goldman labeled it an “Islamophobic” comment that’s “incredibly damaging to Jews trying to combat antisemitism.” Rep. Eric Swalwell insisted, “America is BETTER because of our Muslim community” and “we are WORSE when assholes like this guy spout hate.” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fumed, “This is genuinely one of the most disgusting statements I have ever seen issued by an American official,” adding, “Fine should be censured & stripped of committees.” Fine’s opponent Jennifer Jenkins vowed, “I’m running to kick that bigot out of Washington.” Rep. Bob Menendez complained, “This is what it looks like when Islamophobia and outrage are the only two items on your political agenda.” California Gov. Gavin Newsom barked, “Resign now, you racist slob.” Leftist media figures like CNN’s Jake Tapper echoed, “Disgusting bigotry,” while New York Times’ David French called it “Absolutely evil.” In a Newsmax appearance, Fine pushed back, stating “It’s not enough for Democrats to think anyone who wants to come here illegally should be able to do that. They also think they should be able to get whatever free stuff they want. Now they’re demanding that we change our values and how we live as Americans.” A major Muslim leader in NYC is calling for dogs to be forbidden because they “bother some Muslims.” If Mainstream Muslims make us choose between keeping our dogs and them going home, the choice is easy. — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) Fine clapped back at all the Democrats calling for his censure. An alleged comment? IT WAS IN WRITING, POSTED TO X, AND SEEN MILLIONS OF TIMES BEFORE I RESPONDED. Perhaps you should have read it before you started spouting off like an idiot. As for quoting the Torah, you're forgiven as it is not your faith, but in that same chapter –… — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) Islam is not a race, moron. It is a religion. One where some of its New York leadership is calling for the abolition of dogs. Good luck bringing that to California. — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) At least I know where the equator is. — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) I'd think your New York constituents would want to keep their dogs. — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) He also hit back at media blowhards like Piers Morgan. Piers, what is disgusting is a major NYC Muslim leader saying we must give up our dogs because "NYC is coming to Islam" We will not be shamed into being conquered like the Europeans. I choose my dog. I know my first appearance on your show didn't go well for you, but if you… — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via  . Tue, 02/17/2026 - 15:20 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-pile-after-rep-fine-doubles-down-dogs-over-muslims-remarks
When Both Sides Go Quiet When Both Sides Go Quiet Submitted by There is a political instinct that I’ve developed over the last few decade or so: when both parties are shouting, it’s business as usual. When both parties go quiet, pay attention, because something ugly is probably getting passed or covered up, and the American taxpayer is likely footing the bill of consequences. Few public controversies in recent memory have generated as much bipartisan distrust as the handling of the Epstein files. Republicans accused Democrats of failing to pursue full transparency while President Biden was in office. Now Democrats accuse Republicans of withholding or slow-walking the release of the complete records. The blame shifts with political control, but the underlying fact pattern remains the same: both parties have figures of influence whose names have surfaced in connection with Epstein’s orbit. image That reality complicates the politics of accountability and fuels public suspicion that neither side is entirely comfortable with full disclosure. What should have been a straightforward matter of transparency, identifying networks of power, influence, and possible criminal complicity, has instead unfolded as a slow humiliating drip of redactions, procedural delays, partial disclosures and cagey congressional testimony. Each release seems to raise more questions than it resolves. These questions revolve around sex trafficking, exploitation, abuse of minors, coercion and manipulation, elite complicity, obstruction of justice, etc. image But the deeper damage taking place now is not only about the crimes associated with Jeffrey Epstein. It is about institutional response. If only one political party had meaningful exposure to the scandal, the other would likely have been far more relentless in demanding transparency. But this is different. Despite Democrats harping on the files now, they were quiet in the years prior to Trump’s second term and, because Epstein’s connections span media, finance, academia, and politics, the discomfort still appears bipartisan. And that is precisely what unsettles me. When both political parties fail to press aggressively on something meaningful, especially something morally explosive, it often suggests that the issue cuts deeper than surface narratives allow. Bipartisan hesitation can signal overlapping vulnerability. Silence across the aisle is rarely accidental. The horror here is not just what may have occurred in private circles of power, but the perception that the institutions tasked with accountability are reluctant to fully illuminate it. Justice delayed in cases involving elites feels less like procedural caution and more like reputational risk management. Whether or not that perception is entirely fair, it is corrosive. image Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs’ chief legal officer Kathryn Ruemmler announced her resignation after new emails with Epstein came to light, prompting internal pressure at the firm. British political figure Peter Mandelson resigned from the House of Lords and the Labour Party, and Scotland Yard has opened a criminal investigation into his ties with Epstein. In Norway, parliament has launched an external inquiry into prominent diplomats for their connections to Epstein, and police are investigating corruption allegations against former prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland and others. 🔥 50% OFF FOR LIFE: Using this coupon entitles you to 50% off an annual subscription to Fringe Finance for life:  Across Europe, these disclosures have triggered formal probes, resignations, and institutional reviews that contrast sharply with the relative lack of accountability for high-profile figures in the United States, where calls for investigations and resignations have largely stalled. I mean, is Les Wexner really allowed to just walk around free at this point? How can that be possible? How are Kimbal Musk and Elon Musk allowed to remain on Tesla’s board? Why isn’t Bill Gates being hauled in front of congress? image I have long argued that Americans should apply the same “when both parties agree, the American public is getting screwed” scrutiny to monetary policy for a similar reason. It is one of the few areas where both major political parties display remarkable convergence. While they wage visible battles over cultural issues and tax rates, they tend to align on central banking frameworks, large scale liquidity interventions, and deficit tolerance. Like other cover-ups, that alignment deserves examination. Monetary policy operates largely outside daily partisan warfare, yet it shapes purchasing power, asset prices, debt burdens, and wealth distribution. When balance sheets expand aggressively and markets are repeatedly stabilized during downturns, the effects are uneven. Asset holders often benefit first and most. Meanwhile, wage earners experience the lagging side effects such as inflationary pressure, higher living costs, and diminished purchasing power. Supporters of Modern Monetary Theory argue that sovereign currency systems provide more fiscal flexibility than traditionally assumed. Critics counter that, in practice, repeated interventions risk entrenching a cycle in which gains are privatized and losses are socialized. When markets rise, the wealth effect accrues to those with substantial exposure. When markets falter, public backstops prevent collapse. The middle class absorbs the inflationary residue. And the wealth gap widens: image The structural similarity matters. When both parties avoid aggressive debate on a policy that materially burdens the average American, it raises the same instinctive question of what incentives are being protected. Monetary policy may not carry the visceral grotesqueness of the Epstein scandal, but it carries long term economic consequences that most Americans don’t know they are bearing, and don’t understand that they are being lied to about. The comparison is not moral equivalence. It is structural parallel. In one case, alleged networks of power may be shielded by mutual hesitation. In the other, a financial architecture persists with limited democratic scrutiny because challenging it would destabilize shared political comfort. In both cases, bipartisan alignment dampens confrontation. Two forms of silence. Two different domains. Both revealing. image Foreign policy, particularly the authorization and funding of wars, has often followed a similar pattern. While domestic issues produce loud partisan divides, military interventions abroad frequently pass with overwhelming support from leadership in both parties. Public debate may flare at the margins, but institutional consensus tends to solidify quickly once action begins. History shows that major military engagements, from post 9/11 authorizations to prolonged overseas conflicts, have often been backed by broad congressional majorities. The initial votes are decisive. The funding continues year after year. Only later, when costs mount and public opinion shifts, does meaningful dissent emerge. By then, strategic commitments and financial obligations are deeply entrenched. Again, the pattern is not about moral equivalence between policy domains. It is about incentives. When both political parties converge quickly on matters involving immense money, immense power, or immense liability, scrutiny tends to narrow rather than widen. And when scrutiny narrows at the highest levels, the public’s role shifts from participant to spectator. When both political parties fail to address something meaningful, when they close ranks instead of competing for exposure, the public should not assume the issue is trivial. More often, it suggests the truth behind the surface may be larger and more consequential than advertised. Democracies depend not just on disagreement, but on adversarial pressure. When that pressure disappears, citizens are right to lean in, not tune out. When both sides go quiet, the story is rarely over. As the Epstein files are showing, it may simply run far deeper than we are being shown. Now read: image QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer   with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier. I am an investor in Mark’s fund. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 14:00 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/when-both-sides-go-quiet
It Begins: Mamdani Plans First NYC Property Tax Hike In Decades To Plug $5 Billion Hole It Begins: Mamdani Plans First NYC Property Tax Hike In Decades To Plug $5 Billion Hole New York City property owners are set to 'enjoy' the first property tax hike in more than two decades as part of a proposed solution by Mayor Zohran Mamdani to fill a roughly $5 billion budget gap, Bloomberg reports. image "He’s put a pretty extreme option on the table, which is a combination of raising property taxes and taking money from reserves and relying on some pretty aggressive revenue projections to boot," said NYC Comptroller Mark Levine.  The pitch, set to be unveiled Tuesday afternoon during Mamdani's preliminary budget proposal, comes one day after Governor Kathy Hochul vowed to kick in another $1.5 billion in additional aid to the city for the current fiscal year and next. Hochul has also committed $510 million for future years to help plug holes in the budget.  Mamdani says that the state should step up even more. Last week, he called on state lawmakers Wednesday to approve a 2 percent personal income tax increase on the city’s wealthiest residents as well as a hike in the corporate tax rate in a bid to close a multibillion-dollar budget gap. Of note, Hochul and the legislature must approve any tax changes. While Mamdani is handcuffed in many ways when it comes to raising revenue, raising property taxes is something he can do as part of the annual budget process. Homeowners, meanwhile, just had their assessed values jump 5.6%, which will bring the city an additional $325.8 billion - which is separate of Mamdani's plan.  Mamdani’s own rhetoric about the size and scope of the city’s budget situation has shifted. Earlier this month, just two weeks after describing the city’s $12.6 billion budget deficit as the city’s largest since the Great Recession, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-11/wall-street-bonuses-help-shrink-nyc-s-budget-gap-by-5-billion the hole had actually shrunk by $5 billion, because of higher tax revenue, propelled by personal income tax growth and Wall Street bonuses. Even threatening to raise property taxes could prove a political lightning rod for Mamdani, after campaigning to reform that system, which has been criticized for overburdening lower- and middle-income residents. The last time the city increased property tax rates was under former Mayor Michael Bloomberg in the early 2000s. -https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-17/mamdani-plans-to-hike-nyc-property-tax-to-fill-5-billion-hole Meanwhile last month Mamdani NYC is facing a $12.6 billion deficit over the next two years, which he blamed on his predecessor, Mayor Eric Adams, whose administration he says underbudgeted for various expenses such as cash assistance, rental assistance for homeless residents, special education and overtime costs. In FY 2025, NYC took in over $33 billion in property tax revenue.  Mamdani during his campaign promoted progressive reforms to fund proposals such as free public transit, rent stabilization and win over more moderate Democrats. He called for a 2 percent surcharge on high earners on the campaign trail. Estimates suggested it could create approximately $4 billion annually to support increased public services and affordability programs, as well as offset costs for broad social investments while not saddling middle- and low-income residents. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 13:20 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/it-begins-mamdani-plans-first-nyc-property-tax-hike-decades-plug-5-billion-hole
Anthropic–Pentagon Talks Stall Over AI Guardrails Anthropic–Pentagon Talks Stall Over AI Guardrails Contract renewal talks between Anthropic and the Pentagon have stalled over how its Claude system can be used. The AI firm is seeking stricter limits before extending its agreement, according to a person familiar with the private negotiations and https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-16/pentagon-is-close-to-cutting-ties-with-anthropic-axios-says?srnd=homepage-americas . At the heart of the dispute is control. Anthropic wants firm guardrails to prevent Claude from being used for mass surveillance of Americans or to build weapons that operate without human oversight. The Defense Department’s position is broader: it wants flexibility to deploy the model so long as its use complies with the law. The tension reflects a larger debate over how far advanced AI should go in military settings. Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-16/pentagon-is-close-to-cutting-ties-with-anthropic-axios-says?srnd=homepage-americas that Anthropic has tried to distinguish itself as a safety-first AI developer. It created a specialized version, Claude Gov, tailored to U.S. national security work, designed to analyze classified information, interpret intelligence and process cybersecurity data. The company says it aims to serve government clients while staying within its own ethical red lines. image “Anthropic is committed to using frontier AI in support of US national security,” a spokesperson said, describing ongoing discussions with the Defense Department as “productive conversations, in good faith.” The Pentagon, however, struck a firmer tone. “Our nation requires that our partners be willing to help our warfighters win in any fight,” spokesman Sean Parnell said, adding that the relationship is under review and emphasizing troop safety. Some defense officials have grown wary, viewing reliance on Anthropic as a potential supply-chain vulnerability. The department could ask contractors to certify they are not using Anthropic’s models, according to a senior official—an indication that the disagreement could ripple beyond a single contract. Rival AI developers are watching closely. Tools from OpenAI, Google and xAI are also being discussed for Pentagon use, with companies working to ensure their systems can operate within legal boundaries. Anthropic secured a two-year Pentagon deal last year involving Claude Gov and enterprise products, and the outcome of its current negotiations could influence how future agreements with other AI providers are structured. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 13:00 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/anthropic-pentagon-talks-stall-over-ai-guardrails
Bayer Soars After $10.5 Billion Settlement On Current And Future Roundup Cancer Lawsuits Bayer Soars After $10.5 Billion Settlement On Current And Future Roundup Cancer Lawsuits Bayer stock jumped the most in three months after the company https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260217951897/en/Monsanto-Announces-Roundup-Class-Settlement-Agreement-to-Resolve-Current-and-Future-Claims a $10.5 billion settlement push to settle current and future cancer lawsuits over its Roundup weedkiller. The news was first reported by Bloomberg.  The German chemical giant proposed a $7.5 billion class-action settlement through cases filed in state court in Missouri designed to resolve Roundup suits that already have been filed and potential claims that could be filed over a 20-year period. Bayer also announced $3 billion in settlements of existing U.S. cases in which former Roundup users blame the herbicide for causing their non-Hodgkins lymphoma, it reported. The company has paid about $10 billion to settle most of the Roundup lawsuits that were pending as of 2020, but failed to get a settlement covering future cases. New lawsuits have continued to pour in since then. Plaintiffs have said they developed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and other forms of cancer due to using Roundup, either at home or on the job. Roundup, which was acquired by Bayer, is among the most widely used weedkillers in the United States The class settlement aimed at resolving current and future claims that Roundup weedkiller caused non‑Hodgkin lymphoma is an important addition to its Supreme Court case, Bayer CEO Bill Anderson said on Tuesday. "We are entering into the settlement because it is an important addition to the case before the Supreme Court, thereby minimising the legal risks as comprehensively as possible," he said. "Both elements are necessary independently of each other and reinforce each other," he added. Bayer stock surged on news of the settlement. image   Tue, 02/17/2026 - 12:20 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/bayer-soars-after-105-billion-settlement-current-and-future-roundup-cancer-lawsuits
What Price Will You Pay For What You Need? What Price Will You Pay For What You Need? By Michael Every of Rabobank A Material Shift It was that 2026 rarity of a genuinely ‘quiet day’ on Monday with the US out for Presidents’ Day and much of Asia already on holiday for Lunar New Year. However, despite China staying out for the rest of the week, things are likely to shift to a higher gear from today onwards. The RBA minutes this morning, which explained why rates were hiked 25bps, stated “the latest forecasts produced by the staff were materially stronger than those produced in August and November.” One would hope so, but why were those forecasts stronger? Far more useful is the repeated mention of “material shift” – higher. That’s the case in Australia and world-wide; but not in the way the RBA meant it. We are no longer in a world in which RBA references to (and models of) “aggregate demand” and “aggregate supply” have much relevance. Yes, demand exists. Yes, supply does too. But neither are “aggregate”. Both are now very starkly variate. The IMF just warned Australia that it’s 5% deposit scheme for first-time home buyers will push up housing inflation and should be scrapped – as others warn it’s already too late to do so. The RBA had warned of the same thing months ago too yet now seems surprised it might have shifted their forecasts and Overnight Cash Rate. That’s as the Fed is also set to loosen bank capital requirements to try to encourage more mortgage lending, and at lower rates – though it has to be said that the US bank share of such lending has declined from 60% to 35% since 2003, arguing some reversal could be warranted in the market. Beyond such traditional macro stories, raw materials are again of supreme importance and, as in the past, linked to national security. Demand is vast; yet supply is limited in terms of natural availability and the ‘unnatural’ outcome of China dominating their processing. There is nothing aggregate about this. You have something or you don’t. A machine minus one key widget won’t work, so is worthless. Equally, a gun minus a bullet renders you defenceless. So, what price will you pay for what you need? This is linked to AI, which ‘Anthropic in Venezuela’ shows is about national security. Indeed, the EU Parliament just blocked its MEPs from using AI tools over cyber and privacy fears – though these are perhaps not the high priority targets for foreign intelligence services that they think they are. While politics is hardly a synonym for productivity, should the EU military drop AI, it will be left even further behind the US. Should the EU private sector drop AI too, it would only widen a productivity gap between it and the US and China. If Europe still wants in on any front, that only increases the global urgency to get raw materials and electricity flowing at as cheap a price as possible. What’s the correct interest rate for that? Yet things are not all inflationary: quite the opposite. As China rolls out its latest agentic AI, Qwen 3.5, and Wall Street smashes firms that suddenly may not have a viable business model, a recent summit in India saw experts warn that the country needs to take immediate action to manage the AI threat to the vast number of services sector jobs it’s created. They offer that “more training” can help the country avoid being left with “obsolete skills” – but is that true? The possibilities opened up by AI could arguably see white collar jobs destroyed at a scale and pace that no political economy is prepared for, let alone a stock market. What’s the correct interest rate for that? These are, in both the literal and the metaphorical sense of the term, material shifts. Central bank thinking is, as usual, struggling to keep up. The Fed’s Barr speaks on AI and the labor market today, and Daly on AI and the economy: they both wrote those speeches themselves, right? Meanwhile, US talks with Iran continue today against a backdrop of the IRGC carrying out naval exercises in the Strait of Hormuz. It needs to be repeated that the US continues to surge military power into the region daily: it remains to be seen if that will see Tehran bend or not. Oil prices are up around 1.3% this morning as the market starts to get twitchy. Russia-Ukraine peace talks continue in Geneva, as Lithuania warned against a ‘hollow” Article 5-like guarantee being offered to Ukraine, Finland warned that Russia is reinforcing its nuclear and Arctic assets near its border, the UK press speaks of Europe creating a deterrent with tactical nukes as if this is a cost-free and risk-free exercise, and Ukraine, in the background, reportedly made its fastest battlefield gains in 2.5 years. Also note an unconfirmed report Russia allowed limited dollar trading for the first time in years. That follows the Bloomberg story last week that Moscow is prepared to offer the US a major economic deal. As noted here many times before, the geopolitical and geoeconomic landscapes are one and the same, and our financial architecture merely sits on top of it. Likewise: Trump said he’ll make a decision soon on whether to sell the planned $20bn package of arms to Taiwan or not – there will be regional, if not global, consequences either way. The EU floated that 70% of EVs must be made in there to qualify for state aid, with similar rules for aluminium: that’s a material shift towards either Gaullism or Trumpism. Yet as the Economist claims that ‘Russia’s economy has entered the death zone’, the Ukrainian press reports EU companies are keeping Moscow’s war machine running via their exports to its auto sector. The Eurogroup president said a new Franco-German-led ‘E6’ format to push ahead with deeper structural reforms will only be “temporary”, as Ireland, which was left out, is pushing back. Does that imply that a vanguard group form new structures and then other EU members can then join at their leisure, or will they have to go through some form of a new ‘accession’ process to qualify for this inner sanctum? That’s another material shift. Canada’s natural resources minister is going to Poland to promote Canada’s nuclear energy expertise. That’s as the Financial Post notes, 'We need to wake up': Atlantic Canada a microcosm of the problems facing the rest of the country’, and shares ‘David Rosenberg: Memo to Mark Carney: Don’t bring a butter knife to an economic gun fight.’ The same can be said about central bank models. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 11:20 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/what-price-will-you-pay-what-you-need
Trump Calls In FEMA To Respond To Sewage Disaster In Potomac River Trump Calls In FEMA To Respond To Sewage Disaster In Potomac River President Donald Trump is directing federal emergency teams to respond to a sewage spill on the Potomac River, calling it a “massive ecological disaster” and blaming local leaders for not handling the crisis, which began nearly a month ago. “There is a massive Ecological Disaster unfolding in the Potomac River as a result of the Gross Mismanagement of Local Democrat Leaders, particularly, Governor Wes Moore, of Maryland,” Trump posted on Truth Social on Feb. 16. Moore’s office didn’t immediately return a request for comment on Trump’s statement. image On Jan. 19, a section of the Potomac Interceptor sewer line collapsed, causing the failure of a 60-year-old, 72-inch concrete pipeline along the Clara Barton Parkway in Montgomery County, Maryland. Over 250 million gallons of sewage poured into the Potomac River in one of the largest spills in U.S. history, according to University of Maryland researchers. Water samples collected at the site show high levels of E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus, the bacteria that causes staph infections, researchers reported. “People coming into contact with the impacted water or land are at risk of becoming infected with these bacteria, which can lead to serious health conditions,” said Dr. Rachel Rosenberg Goldstein, a microbiologist and assistant professor at the university. Trump said the spill was the “result of incompetent local and state management of essential waste management systems.” “It is clear local authorities cannot adequately handle this calamity,” Trump stated. “Therefore, I am directing federal authorities to immediately provide all necessary management, direction, and coordination to protect the Potomac, the water supply in the Capital region, and our treasured National Resources in our Nation’s Capital City.” Despite state and local leaders not asking for federal assistance, Trump said he “cannot allow incompetent local ‘leadership’ to turn the river in the heart of Washington into a disaster zone.” The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), will play a key role in coordinating the response, the president stated. FEMA and DHS are facing a lapse as Democrats in the U.S. Senate demand changes to immigration enforcement. image Crews work to keep raw sewage from flowing into the Potomac River after a pipeline rupture, in Glen Echo, Md., on Jan. 23, 2026. Cliff Owen/AP Photo According to Virginia’s health department, the utility DC Water is handling repairs to the pipe, while Maryland has regulatory authority over the Potomac River for recreational advisories, water quality monitoring, and issuing bans on shellfish harvesting. The Virginia Health Department was working with the Maryland departments of Health and the Environment during the crisis. DC Water has stated that drinking water is not affected by the incident. The nearest Virginia location using the Potomac River as a primary source of water is the city of Fairfax, with an intake located several miles upstream of where the sewage spill entered the river, according to Virginia. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 10:40 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-calls-fema-respond-sewage-disaster-potomac-river
Netflix Grants Warner Bros. One Week Waiver To Reopen Paramount Skydance Deal Talks Netflix Grants Warner Bros. One Week Waiver To Reopen Paramount Skydance Deal Talks Warner Bros. Discovery said in a press release that it will temporarily reopen talks with Paramount Skydance after Netflix granted a seven-day waiver, allowing WBD to address "deficiencies that remain unresolved and clarify certain terms of PSKY's proposed merger agreement." "Netflix has provided WBD a limited waiver under the terms of WBD's merger agreement with Netflix, permitting WBD to engage in discussions with Paramount Skydance ("PSKY") (NASDAQ: PSKY) for a seven-day period ending on February 23, 2026, to seek clarity for WBD stockholders and provide PSKY the ability to make its best and final offer," WBD said in the . image It continued, "During this period, WBD will engage with PSKY to discuss the deficiencies that remain unresolved and clarify certain terms of PSKY's proposed merger agreement." Paramount has been pressing a hostile, shareholder-directed tender offer for WBD, including its cable channels CNN and TNT, at $30 per share (all cash) after losing out to Netflix in a previous bidding war. The months-long takeover battle is over some of the entertainment industry's most important intellectual property, including HBO, Superman, and Harry Potter. WBD said a senior Paramount representative informed its board that Paramount would pay $31 per share if talks were to reopen. After the limited waiver period, WBD said, "Netflix retains its matching rights as defined by the merger agreement." "Throughout the entire process, our sole focus has been on maximizing value and certainty for WBD shareholders," WBD President and CEO David Zaslav said in the release. Zaslav noted, "Every step of the way, we have provided PSKY with clear direction on the deficiencies in their offers and opportunities to address them. We are engaging with PSKY now to determine whether they can deliver an actionable, binding proposal that provides superior value and certainty for WBD shareholders through their best and final offer." WBD said its board "continues to unanimously recommend in favor of the Netflix merger" and has set March 20 for a shareholder vote on that deal, https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/netflix-buy-warner-bros-72-billion-deal-hollywood-goes-panic-mode . Paramount shares jumped nearly 6% in early trading, while WBD gained about 3%, and Netflix rose slightly.   Tue, 02/17/2026 - 09:50 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/netflix-grants-warner-bros-one-week-waiver-reopen-paramount-skydance-deal-talks
Russia Pounded By Biggest Ukrainian Drone Swarm Since January Ahead Of Geneva Talks Russia Pounded By Biggest Ukrainian Drone Swarm Since January Ahead Of Geneva Talks Russia's Defense Ministry on Tuesday is reporting an overnight and early morning attack the largest drone assault from Ukraine since early January. Russian air defenses shot down more than 150 Ukrainian drones in the attack which included hundreds of UAVs sent in total, as officials from both sides are imminently expected meet in Switzerland for another round of peace talks. image According to the ministry, 79 drones were intercepted over the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, 38 over annexed Crimea, and 18 over the Krasnodar region. It is clearly among the biggest single wave of cross-border assaults since January 1st - when Moscow said it downed 168 unmanned aircraft in a similar attack. Russian governor of Sevastopol Mikhail Razvozhayev announced that in Crimea a nine-year-old boy was hospitalized with minor injuries, and that there was significant damage to vehicles, apartment buildings, private homes, and gas pipelines due to the strikes. Neighboring Krasnodar saw a fire erupt at the Ilsky Oil Refinery due to drone strikes. Ukraine’s military boated of hitting the refinery, as it is owned by the Kuban Oil and Gas Company, which Kiev has highlighted supports Russian military logistics. Authorities in other regions reported no casualties or significant damage from the overnight attacks - though airports across over a dozen cities imposed temporary flight restrictions as the drone wave unfolded. Russia’s Defense Ministry later into Tuesday morning said it shot down nearly 30 additional inbound Ukrainian drones. As for the ongoing peace talks in Geneva, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov has told a press briefing not to expect much in terms of anything concrete today. "I don’t think we should expect any news today because, as you know, work is scheduled to continue tomorrow. We have no plans to make any statements or remarks," he underscored. Peskov explained on Monday, "This time, the idea is to discuss a broader range of issues, including, in fact, the main ones. The main issues concern both the territories and everything else related to the demands we have put forward." Russia’s delegation is led by Presidential Aide Vladimir Medinsky. US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner will represent the US at the talks, and they are coming off the indirect talks with Iran from earlier the same day, also happening in Geneva. 🇷🇺✈️🇨🇭Flight route of the Russian delegation led by Vladimir Medinsky to Geneva. The aircraft avoided a direct route over most EU airspace and flew only through Italian airspace. As we noted yesterday, Italy was the most likely option — unlike the openly hostile Baltic states,… — DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) As for President Trump's latest assessment, he told reporters aboard Air Force One, "Well, we have big talks." He stated that "It’s going to be very easy. I mean, look, so far, Ukraine better come to the table fast. That’s all I’m telling you." He tends to go back and forth from month to month chastising either side, and apparently now the public pressure is back on the Zelensky government. Trump has been quieter of late when it comes to demanding that Ukraine quickly hold national elections, despite https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/kremlins-surprise-overture-ready-halt-airstrikes-election-if-zelensky-allows-vote to cease airstrikes deep inside Ukraine when the vote happens. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 09:40 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russia-pounded-biggest-ukrainian-drone-swarm-january-ahead-geneva-talks
Nuclear Reactor Transported By Air For First Time In 60 Years Nuclear Reactor Transported By Air For First Time In 60 Years In coordination with the Department of War and the Department of Energy, Valar Atomics has transported their high-temperature gas-cooled reactor from California to Utah via C-17.  The event marks a major turning point for the nuclear industry, as reactor developers had been seen until this point as just another group of boring construction teams and quiet operators. But the more glamorous side of venture capital funded efforts is starting to make its way into the world of fission. Today, the Department of War will execute Operation Windlord, the first C-17 airlift of a nuclear reactor, in partnership with the Department of Energy and Valar Atomics. Three C-17s Globemasters carrying the 8 modules of the Ward250 reactor will fly from March ARB to Hill AFB. — Isaiah Taylor - making nuclear reactors (@isaiah_p_taylor) Nuclear energy has suffered from decades of neglect and atrophy, and it appears the newest generation of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs are finally taking interest in the nuclear industry again.  Coverage of the event has been provided by all the major outlets including https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-conducts-first-air-transport-nuclear-microreactor-bid-show-technologys-2026-02-16/ , but there is a lack of understanding for what's actually going on. None of the news agencies reporting on the event have provided any added context to the history of reactors up in the air, what Valar Atomics is trying to do, and frankly what was even inside the plane. image Valar constructed their Ward250 gas reactor in their facility in California. There is no fuel added to the reactor core yet, as shipping that through the air would be a regulatory nightmare in today's environment. To put out the fires of some of the fear-mongering that has been going around about the event, which will come off as underplaying the advanced engineering and fabrication that went into the production of the components, all Valar did was ship a complicated piece of metal in a cargo plane.  To be sure, the company has made significant progress toward meeting the July 4th criticality timeline set by last year's nuclear executive orders. Taking a reactor critical means the reactor goes from a dormant, shutdown state to the point where the uranium inside the core is undergoing a sustained, controlled rate of fission (atoms splitting apart and releasing energy) on its own.  And this latest milestone with government agencies was a phenomenal exercise in complicated logistical coordination, private-public partnerships, and capability demonstrations.  One of the biggest errors in most of the reporting is that this is the first time a reactor has been put up into the sky. This can unfortunately not be further from the truth, even though Secretary Wright tries to make the same claim. President Trump promised to unleash American energy dominance. Today, this administration advanced that mission by moving a nuclear reactor by air for the very first time. — Secretary Chris Wright (@SecretaryWright) Scrolling all the way back to the 1950s, as the world was proving nuclear energy could be used for other than weaponry and destruction, President Eisenhower's Atoms for Peace initiative sent a nuclear reactor across the Atlantic to Geneva, Switzerland. It was a pool-type research reactor built and tested in Tennessee. The reactor was dismantled and flown to Geneva where it was rebuilt and taken critical again. Also in the 1950s, the U.S. pursued nuclear-powered long-range bombers before cruise missiles were developed. The Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion Program developed the Aircraft Shield Test Reactor and flew it in the air with fuel while operating under a multi-year test program. The reactor was never used to directly power an aircraft and the program was eventually shut down.  The third major “reactor in the air” was the PM-1 reactor developed under the Army's nuclear program in the 1960s. After initial construction in Maryland, the TM-1 was disassembled and shipped through the air to South Dakota and then to its final destination in Wyoming where it was assembled and operated.  All things considered, the event is a huge win for the nuclear industry. Nuclear energy is finally getting some of the attention it needs to make further strides in public approval and federal support. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 08:40 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/nuclear-reactor-transported-air-first-time-60-years
Futures Fall As AI Selloff Resumes Futures Fall As AI Selloff Resumes US equity futures woke up after President's Day and chose to resume their selloff (after a modest bounce on Monday's holiday failed to hold) dragged by Tech, as the risk-off moves on AI disruption fears continue. As of 8:15am ET, S&P 500 futures were down 0.5% with Nasdaq 100 contracts falling 1.0%. In premarket trading, all Mag 7 stocks are lower and Semis are being pressured with AVGO / NVDA lower by more than 1%. Pockets of outperformance (and higher absolute returns) can be found in Energy, Fins, Indu, and Defensives. Overseas markets mixed with UK up 70bps, Hong Kong, mainland China, Taiwan, Korea all closed. Lunar New Year Kicks off. Bond yields are low by 1-3bp as the yield curve bull flattens; the USD is bid higher. Commodities are weaker with WTI rising modestly on geopolitics and Ags / Metals for sale. Spot gold dropped toward $4,900 an ounce. Bitcoin, as usual, dumps. This morning we will receive the weekly ADP, Empire State manufacturing survey and NAHB housing market index for February. We will also hear from Fed Governor Barr and San Francisco Fed President Daly; key macro prints come on Friday with PCE and Flash PMIs.  image In premarket trading, MAg 7 stocks are all lower (Amazon -0.3%, Apple -0.2%, Microsoft -0.5%, Nvidia -0.9%, Meta -0.6%, Alphabet -1.5%, Tesla -1%) AeroVironment (AVAV) gains 3% as JPMorgan initiates coverage with a recommendation of overweight following a selloff in the the drone maker’s stock. Fiserv (FISV) rises 4% after the Wall Street Journal reported that activist investor Jana Partners has built a stake in the fintech company, citing people familiar with the matter. General Mills (GIS) falls 3% after the packaged foods company cut some forecasts for the full year. ImmunityBio shares (IBRX) gains 6% after the drugmaker said the Saudi Food and Drug Authority encouraged the company to submit a regulatory package for its bladder cancer therapy to expand access in Saudi Arabia. Masimo (MASI) jumps 34% after the Financial Times said Danaher is closing in on a nearly $10 billion deal to buy medical technology company, citing unidentified people familiar with the matter. Shares of Danaher (DHR) fall 6%. Norwegian Cruise (NCLH) rises over 7% after the Wall Street Journal reported that activist investor Elliott Investment Management has built a more than 10% stake in the cruise-ship company. TripAdvisor (TRIP) inches less than 1% higher after Starboard Value LP announced plans to nominate a majority slate of director candidates for the 2026 annual meeting. Veeva Systems (VEEV) rises over 1% as Morgan Stanley upgrades the the application software company to equal-weight, saying competitive risks are “better understood.” Warner Bros Discovery Inc. (WBD) rises over 2% after agreeing to temporarily reopen sale negotiations with rival Hollywood studio Paramount Skydance Corp., setting the stage for a potential second bidding war with Netflix Inc. Shares of Paramount Skydance (PSKY) gain 3%. Zim Integrated Shipping (ZIM) surges 35% after Hapag-Lloyd AG said it’s buying the Israeli shipping company. In other corporate news, WSJ reports that activist Elliott is said to have built a large stake in Norwegian Cruise Line. Apple will hold a product launch on March 4. Anthropic’s talks to extend a contract with the Pentagon are said to have stalled on surveillance concerns. The Pentagon is also said to be seeking voice-controlled, autonomous drone swarming technology, with SpaceX among companies competing.  US traders are returning to their desks eying firms’ swelling AI budgets, while also wary of the technology’s potential to hurt industries outside the tech sector. Meanwhile, Brent crude erased losses as Iran talked up military drills near the Strait of Hormuz — at the same time that the country is undertaking a fresh round of indirect nuclear negotiations with the US. There’s “lingering anxiety about whether AI spending will be profitable enough, concerns about competition, and a broader de-risking from the most crowded trades after a very strong run,” said Aneeka Gupta, macroeconomic research director at WisdomTree. The search for stocks on the right side of the artificial intelligence trade is front and center for investors at the start of a shortened week — with a backdrop that may benefit selective buyers. The “perception of AI seems to have changed completely from the angel of mercy to the kiss of death,” said Stephan Kemper, chief investment strategist at BNP Paribas Wealth Management. Concerns as to whether hyperscalers can monetize ever-growing investments in AI are back while “the fact that AI can often be a tool to enhance profitability is completely ignored,” Kemper added. Two opposing fears are evident - one that AI is poised to disrupt entire industries, the other that investors are skeptical of whether the huge capex outlays will deliver Alibaba unveiled a major update of its flagship AI model, ahead of a much anticipated release from DeepSeek. AI even gets into the Fed’s narrative with Barr due to speak on AI and the labor market, and Daly on AI and the economy later today.  returns. And AI is dominating conference calls.   image A record number of investors say companies are spending far too much, according to Bank of America Corp.’s latest fund manager survey. A quarter of participants saw an “AI bubble” as the top tail risk to markets, while 30% said capital expenditure on AI by the big tech companies was the most likely source of a credit crisis. Meanwhile, two-year forward earnings estimates for software stocks have risen over the last three months, undeterred by the selloff over AI disruption worries, according to Goldman analysts, while RBC strategists say equity market is witnessing a type of “sentiment unwind” on AI jitters that likely has more to go.  Over the weekend, Rubio spoke at the Munich Security Conference and emphasized the important of the deep ties between the US and EU, but also echoed the Trump administration’s talking points about the threat of Western decline (WSJ). RTRS reported the Pentagon preparing for the potential for a weeks-long campaign against Iran should Trump decide to launch another round of strikes which comes as the IRGC was conducting "smart drills" near the Strait of Hormuz. Also over the weekend, Trump said Rubio is in talks with Cuba as the island nation faces worsening economic conditions. Trump also said he’s speaking to China’s XI Jinping about weapons sales to Taiwan. Iran’s foreign minister met the UN nuclear chief before the next round of negotiations with the US.  Brent traded 0.1% higher to $68.75 a barrel in London after Iranian state TV in the Islamic Republic reported that parts of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important oil-shipping lanes, will be closed for “several hours” on Tuesday as part of Iran’s military exercises. The drills, announced previously, come as Iran and the US start a second round of negotiations in Geneva.  Trump has threatened to strike Iran unless it agrees to a deal curbing Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. He’s mobilized warships and fighter jets near Iran in response to a recent deadly crackdown by the regime there following mass protests. Looking at earnings, out of the 371 S&P 500 companies that have reported so far in the earnings season, 76% have managed to beat analyst forecasts, while 20% have missed. Medtronic, Genuine Parts and Vulcan Materials are among companies expected to report results before the market opens. Medtronic’s organic revenue growth for fiscal 3Q is likely to exceed the consensus estimate of 5.5%, driven by strong sales of pulsed field ablation products used to treat atrial fibrillation, reflecting robust demand seen at peers like Boston Scientific and Abbott, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Earnings from Palo Alto Networks and Toll Brothers follow later in the day. European stocks holding firm with Stoxx 600 up by 0.1%. The utilities sector outperforms as artificial intelligence worries linger and tensions in the Middle East drive a risk-off mood among investors. Miners lag as precious and industrial metals prices drop. On the data front, UK employment data surprised to the downside where the unemployment rate rose to 5.2%, above consensus and the BOE's forecast of 5.1%. Following the print, odds for a BOE cut in March cut rose to ~80% (vs ~70% Friday). Here are some of the biggest movers on Tuesday: Avolta shares rise as much as 5.7% to the highest level since 2021 after UBS upgraded the travel retailer to buy, citing an improving business model focus and favorable industry trends. Genmab shares climb as much as 2.7% after Jefferies resumed coverage on the stock with a buy rating, highlighting the Danish biotech company’s attractive valuation and “catalyst rich” 2026. SSP shares surge as much as 11%, touching the highest level since December. UBS raised its recommendation to buy from neutral as analysts expect the catering firm’s focus on cash flow generation to ease concerns. Mol shares drop as much as 4.1%, down for the third day. The company said it is seeking a release of Hungarian strategic oil reserves to keep refineries operating. BFF Bank shares fall as much as 12% to a record low after confirming a report that Italian prosecutors opened an investigation into the specialist lender. Qiagen shares slide as much as 4.8% following a Financial Times report that Danaher could announce a roughly $10 billion deal to acquire US medical technology firm Masimo. Antofagasta shares sink as much as 5.2% in London. The copper miner’s earnings and dividend payout underwhelmed some analysts, while it kept its guidance unchanged. Hensoldt shares slip as much as 4.7%. Mediobanca initiated the stock with an underperform rating on valuation concerns. It leads a drop in European defense stocks ahead of new rounds of Russia-Ukraine peace talks and US-Iran nuclear talks in Geneva on Tuesday. Truecaller shares plunge as much as 26% to a record low after the Swedish developer of a caller ID and spam-blocking app gave what JPMorgan analysts called “disappointing” commentary on advertising and the firm’s Truecaller for Business segment. Earlier in the session, stocks fell in Japan, offsetting gains in India and Thailand, on a day when most of the region’s markets were closed for Lunar New Year. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index was steady, while Japan’s Topix slid 0.7%. SoftBank Group and Hitachi were among the biggest drags, while BHP Group gained. Stocks also retreated in New Zealand, while shares edged higher in Australia, Thailand and India. Volumes were thin, with bourses closed in markets including China, Hong Kong and South Korea. Japanese stock investors extended profit-taking after last week’s post-election gains, as concerns about disruption from artificial intelligence linger. In FX, the pound weaker but off the low. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index little changed with DXY $97, yen and the kiwi outperforming. The yen, historically seen as a haven, strengthened 0.2% against the dollar. In rates, the risk-off mood and last week’s slower inflation print buoyed Treasuries, lowering the yield on the 10-year note two basis points to 4.03% and sharply lower than beginning of the month and basically at one-year lows; gilts outperformed in Europe after weak jobs data firmed up bets on BOE interest-rate cuts in 2026. In the US, treasuries hold small curve-flattening gains as US trading resumes after Monday’s holiday, with yields having reached new lows for this year, at 4.016% for the 10-year. Most sovereign bond markets also have gains, led by Japan’s, following strong demand for an auction of five-year notes. Yields remain lower by 0.5bp to 2.6bp following the market’s biggest weekly gain since August, driven by softer-than-estimated January CPI data released Friday and volatility in risk assets including US stocks. For IG corporate new-issue calendar, underwriters anticipate weekly supply totaling about $24 billion; about $40 billion was priced last week, with roughly half in the form of Alphabet’s jumbo offering. Treasury coupon auctions this week include $16 billion 20-year new issue Wednesday and $9 billion 30-year TIPS new issue Thursday In commodities, crude moving higher with WTI $64 up 150bps after Iran said military drills will close part of the Strait of Hormuz for several hours; the rest of the commodities complex lower led by front month gas off 3% to $3.15. Gold weaker, down about $69 to $4,922/oz, and silver sinking to about $74/oz.  The US economic data calendar ADP weekly employment change (8:15am), February Empire manufacturing (8:30am) and February NAHB housing market index (10am). Fed speakers scheduled include Governor Barr (12:45pm) and San Francisco Fed President Daly (2:30pm) Market Snapshot S&P 500 mini -0.2% Nasdaq 100 mini -0.6% Russell 2000 mini -0.2% Stoxx Europe 600 +0.2% DAX +0.3%, CAC 40 +0.2% 10-year Treasury yield -2 basis points at 4.02% VIX +0.7 points at 21.85 Bloomberg Dollar Index little changed at 1183.25 euro little changed at $1.1844 WTI crude +0.9% at $63.44/barrel Top Overnight News German investor optimism fell in February, with the ZEW institute's expectations index decreasing to 58.3 from 59.6 in January, in blow to recovery: BBG Traders cemented bets on two BOE rate cuts in 2026 after UK unemployment approached the highest level in five years and wage growth cooled: BBG Iran and the US met for a second round of nuclear talks in Switzerland as they seek to avoid renewed conflict in the Middle East. Iranian officials have expressed willingness to discuss their nuclear-enrichment activities, but have tied any concessions to the potential easing of American sanctions: BBG A growing number of Wall Street pros say now might be the time to get greedy as AI fear runs amok in the US equity market. Investors are selling entire industry groups when a new AI tool threatens to upset an industry, presenting a chance to buy, according to money managers and analysts: BBG Spanish PM Sanchez said the Council of Ministers will invoke Article 8 to ask the Public Prosecutor to investigate Meta (META), X and TikTok. EU privacy watchdog opens probe into X over sexualised AI images: FT. A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk APAC stocks traded mixed amid the extremely thinned conditions due to the Lunar New Year holiday and in the absence of a lead from the US, where markets were closed for Washington's Birthday/Presidents' Day. ASX 200 was led higher by outperformance in miners as BHP shares surged after the mining giant reported a 28% jump in H1 net, although gains in the broader market were capped by weakness in tech and real estate. Nikkei 225 retreated shortly after the open with SoftBank and heavy industry stocks leading the declines, as the post-election euphoria petered out following the recent underwhelming GDP data. Top Asian News Japanese PM Takaichi to unveil a sweeping budgeting reform, placing strategic investments under a ringfenced multi-year framework to enhance predictability and attract private capital, Nikkei reports citing a draft Japan PM Takaichi considers multi-year budget for growth and crisis management, according to Nikkei citing her draft policy speech for Friday. Japanese Finance Ministry estimate indicates annual bond issuance could rise 28% three years from now amid increasing debt financing costs, according to Reuters. Indian Government Minister said we are discussing age-based social media ban with firms. European bourses (STOXX 600 +0.2%) initially started on the backfoot but have reversed earlier losses and are now trading mostly in the green. The SMI (+0.7%) leads, while the AEX (+0.2%) lags, weighted on by losses in ASML (-1.3%). FTSE 100 (+0.5%) sits near the top of the pile, aided by softer-than-expected jobs and wages data, increasing the likelihood of BoE rate cuts. European sectors are mostly firmer. Utilities (+1.3%) and Insurance (+1.2%) reside near the top, with insurance names helped by a broker upgrade for AXA (+1.8%, initiated with outperform at RBC) and a sector perform rating for Allianz. Basic Resources (-1.4%) is the clear underperformer, weighed on by metal prices (XAU -1.3%, XAG -2.4%). Top European News The German Chamber of Industry and Commerce raises its 2026 GDP growth forecast from 0.7% to 1.0%. Swedish Finance Minister said they are not expecting to join the Euro in the coming years. UK government quietly shelved a programme to build a frictionless post-Brexit trade border, after spending GBP 110mln on a contract with Deloitte and IBM for the project, according to FT. EU officials held a constructive meeting to strengthen the international role of the euro on Monday, according to EU's Dombrovskis. FX DXY trades flat intraday but at the lower end of a tight 97.072-97.247 range as US participants gear up to return from the long weekend. Focus has been on geopolitics as US-Iran talks look to continue through to the afternoon, whilst US-Ukraine-Russia trilateral talks have now been moved to tomorrow. On the data front for the day ahead, weekly ADP jobs data are due (prev. showed an average of +6.5k/week over the four-week period). Elsewhere, the Empire State Manufacturing Index for February, and the NAHB housing market index for February are scheduled. JPY gained as risk sentiment in Japan deteriorated shortly after the open, while there were some recent comments from former BoJ board member Adachi, who sees a likelihood that the BoJ will hike rates by 25bps in April. During European hours, the JPY remains the outperformer as US yields fall, but overall, the pair remains within the ranges of the last four trading sessions, with today's current parameters between 152.70 and 153.75. Note, JPY could also be seeing some haven flows against the backdrop of the US-Iran talks today. GBP fell in the aftermath of a dovish jobs report: unemployment unexpectedly rose to 5.2%, just below the BoE’s 5.3% peak forecast (raised in February), while wage growth slowed across both measures, especially including bonuses. GBP/USD have recovered off its worst levels with the pair currently around the middle of a 1.3552-1.3633 intraday range at the time of writing. EUR marginally trickled lower, but with price action kept within tight parameters near the 1.1850 level amid light newsflow from the bloc and the recent mixed EU Industrial Production data. Some risk was taken out for the EUR (for today) as the US-Ukraine-Russia trilateral meeting has been pushed back to tomorrow. A modest four-pip immediate dip was seen as German ZEW disappointed, with EUR/USD currently in a 1.1828-1.1852 range. Central Banks RBA Minutes from February meeting stated that members agreed that prevailing uncertainties meant it was not possible to have a high degree of confidence in any particular path for the cash rate. Board concluded inflation would stay stubbornly high if it had not hiked interest rates as it did this month. Members agreed that the data received since the previous meeting had strengthened their concern that without a policy response, inflation would remain persistently above target for too long. NBP Member Dabrowski says April would be safer to cut rates than in March, a policy rate of 3.5% in 2026 is achievable. FX USTs move higher this morning by around 7 ticks, currently trading within a 113-03 to 113-14 range. From a yield perspective, the 10yr is now eyeing the 4% mark (currently 4.025%), and trading at lows not seen since late Nov’25. Much of the upside can seemingly be attributed to the muted risk tone, in an environment clouded by geopolitical uncertainty, with US-Iran and US-Ukraine-Russia talks taking place. The former arguably holds added risk, given there is some chance that the US could strike Iran if talks break down – though analysts believe that the most likely outcome is not a full deal today but a decision to keep talks alive. (Full analysis piece can be found on the Newsquawk feed) Bunds follow the global fixed income complex higher. In reaction to the UK’s jobs/wages data, Bunds spiked higher from 129.30 to 129.41. Currently trading higher by around 15 ticks and at the upper end of a 129.13 to 129.36 range – the 10yr yield is trading well outside recent ranges, around 2.733%. Further pressure could see the 10yr test 2.70%, which happens to be the trough from the 1st of December 2025. Following the softer-than-expected ZEW series, Bunds rose from 129.37 to 129.41 - the peak for the day. Demand for German debt remains tepid, with the 2yr Schatz demand sub-2x b/c. Gilts gapped higher by 38 ticks before climbing another two to a 92.32 peak, in reaction to the latest unemployment and wage data. If the move continues, resistance comes into view at 92.51, 92.56 and 92.95. Upside spurred in a dovish reaction to a report that showed a further deterioration in the labour market, as the unemployment rate ticked up to 5.2% and is just a tenth shy of the BoE's 5.3% peak forecast (a view that was increased in the February MPR). Furthermore, wage data showed a moderation from the prior for both metrics and markedly so for the measure incl. bonuses. Sparking a dovish reaction in BoE pricing, however, the next cut remains priced for April, but March is now up to -21bps (-20.3bps pre-release) while the timing for a second 2026 cut has been brought forward to November from December. JGBs firmer, with upside of just over 50 ticks at best, hitting a 132.60 peak. Upside was a function of the negative risk tone in Japan overnight, where conditions were very limited due to numerous APAC closures. Furthermore, participants continue to digest the policy implications of recent weak GDP data. Note, there was fleeting JGB pressure to a broadly in-line 5yr auction. Germany sells EUR 4.59bln vs exp. EUR 6bln 2.10% 2028 Schatz: b/c 1.77x (prev. 2.1x), average yield 2.02% (prev. 2.14%), retention 23.5% (prev. 22.8%). UK sells GBP 500mln 0.125% 2028 Gilt via Tender: b/c 4.05x (prev. 3.77x), average yield 3.336% (prev. 3.443%), tail 0.7bps (prev. 0.6bps). Japan sold JPY 1.9tln 5yr JGBs; b/c 3.10x (prev. 3.08x), average yield 1.640% (prev. 1.639%). Commodities WTI Mar'26 and Brent Apr'26 are trading around the lower range of USD 62.84-63.87/bbl and USD 67.85-68.62/bbl, respectively. Focus for oil traders is on meetings between the US and Iran and the trilateral talks between Russia, US and Ukraine. At the time of writing, the trilateral talks have concluded, with talks set to resume tomorrow. Much of the action this morning has been spurred by Iran-related commentary; some pressure in the complex on reports that Iran approved IAEA visit to nuclear facilities, but soon reversed after hawkish commentary from Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei, who suggested that the US army needs to be "slapped" so hard it cannot get up. Most recently, reports suggest that Iran announced its readiness to reduce uranium enrichment, and are now at the stage of discussing technical issues. Ultimately, very choppy action given the mixed newsflow. Precious metals have stalled following prior day gains, with the yellow metal slipping below the USD 5,000/oz mark and silver falling by 4.5%, though off worst levels seen during the APAC session. Analysts note that liquidity remains thin, particularly across metals. Focus now turns to US ADP employment figures, which could trigger volatility. Weaker jobs data could trigger a weaker USD, spurring the yellow metal and vice versa. Copper prices remain subdued, largely amid the mixed global risk tone and the closure of the Chinese market due to the Chinese holiday. 3M LME Copper currently trades in a narrow range of USD 12,695.08-12,849k/t. Geopolitics: Ukraine Russia's Kremlin said the three-way talk with US and Ukraine in Geneva will continue tomorrow with no news expected today. Russian Defence Ministry said Russia carried out a massive strike on military targets in Ukraine, IFX reported. Russian President Putin advisor Patrushev said Russia is preparing measures to respond to seizures of its trading vessels, IFX reported. Ukrainian long-range drones hit the Ilsky Oil Refinery in the Krasnodar Krai region of Russia and the refinery is on fire, according to Visegrad 24. Geopolitics: Middle East Iran is ready to stay for days and weeks in Geneva in order to reach an agreement, Al Jazeera reports citing the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman. US-Iran nuclear negotiations in Geneva have entered the stage of discussing technical issues, Al Jazeera reports citing Iranian TV. Iran announced its readiness to reduce uranium enrichment, Al Hadath reports citing Iran's ambassador in Cairo; adds "The contradiction of the US statements is proof of its lack of seriousness in the negotiations." Iran's IRGC are holding military exercises in the Strait of Hormuz and the Sea of Oman at the same time as US-Iran nuclear talks, Iran International reports. Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei says, in relation to the US, "The strongest army in the world may sometimes be slapped so hard that it cannot get up." Indirect talks between the US and Iran have begun with a message exchange process, according to reported. Senior Iranian Official said Iran's approach to US talks are positive and serious, but holds no preconception about the outcome. "Iran approves IAEA visit to nuclear facilities", Al Arabiya reported. Russian President's Aide said Russia, Iran and China sent ships to the Strait of Hormuz to participate in the "Security Belt 2026" exercise, Al Jazeera reported (as expected). US officials say they expect Iran to come to Geneva talks today with concrete concessions regarding its nuclear program, according to Axios. US President Trump said he will be involved in the Iran talks indirectly and that Iran wants to make a deal. Iran are bad negotiators and he hopes they will be more reasonable in talks. US delegation led by Special Envoy Witkoff leaves for Geneva for talks with Iran. Palestinian media reported Israeli army conducts bombing operations in deployment areas within Beit Lahiyah and the Northern Gaza Strip, according to Al Qahera. Geopolitics: Others US President Trump said Secretary of State Rubio is talking to Cuba right now and that they want to make a deal, adds will see how it all turns out with Cuba and the US talking. US Event Calendar 8:30 am: Feb Empire Manufacturing, est. 6.2, prior 7.7 10:00 am: Feb NAHB Housing Market Index, est. 38, prior 37 12:45 pm: Fed’s Barr Speaks on AI and the Labor Market 2:30 pm: Fed’s Daly Speaks on AI and the Economy DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap Without wanting to put you off reading any further, this may be the most boring EMR of the year so far, as yesterday was unusually calm compared with the pace of events so far in 2026. However there were a couple of new big AI disruption stories in the European session to report of below. But it was quiet due to the combination of the US holiday and the Lunar New Year in China, offering markets a chance to pause, and the subdued volumes suggested many participants took the opportunity to have a lie down... or watch the Curling or Ski Jumping. Chinese markets remain closed until next Tuesday, with Hong Kong set to reopen on Friday and Korea on Thursday. US markets reopen today, and S&P (-0.58%) and Nasdaq (-0.96%) futures are both trading lower after having edged higher for most of yesterday's session. 10yr Treasury yields (-2.5bps) are also creeping lower again, trading at 4.025% this morning. After last week’s sizeable rally in US yields, attention is firmly on the bond market as investors look ahead to Friday’s core PCE and Q4 GDP releases. Today starts the US data week quietly, with the February NY Fed Empire State Survey (+0.5 expected) and the NAHB Housing Market Index (37 expected) due. The rates rally is spreading across Asia with 10-30yr JGBs -6 to -10bps lower as I type after a slightly better than expected 5 year auction. The Nikkei is down -0.92%, continuing its decline from the previous session helped by disappointing GDP figures for the fourth quarter. Meanwhile, the S&P/ASX 200 is experiencing a slight increase of +0.26%, primarily supported by gains from the mining giant BHP Group (+4.75%), which reported robust earnings for the first half of the fiscal year. That's one company AI will struggle to disrupt, although as an aside I just asked our AI tool if it could be disrupted and the one way is if AI allows exploration and discovery to get faster and cheaper for challengers! Is nothing safe! However this is probably also a case where the company could also use such analysis. Regarding central bank developments, the minutes from the Reserve Bank of Australia’s most recent monetary policy meeting indicated that the rate increase was prompted by stronger-than-anticipated data, ongoing widespread inflation, and relaxed financial conditions. Nevertheless, the central bank expressed uncertainty about the future trajectory of inflation and the economy, resulting in a lack of a “high degree of confidence in any particular path for the cash rate.” With the US out yesterday, European markets were similarly subdued. Equities saw only modest moves, with the STOXX 600 (+0.13%) and FTSE 100 (+0.26%) finishing slightly higher even with a dip into the close. But beneath the surface, AI related concerns continued to simmer. In Germany, Siemens fell sharply (-6.41%) amid growing worries that industrial software could be another area exposed to AI disruption. That decline weighed on the DAX, which closed -0.46%. Likewise, France’s Dassault Systèmes slumped (-10.44%) on similar concerns, although the CAC 40 (+0.06%) still managed a marginal gain. It’s clear that the market hasn’t yet shaken off this theme. Across Europe, the news flow remained light as EU leaders returned from the Munich Security Conference. Reports from the FT and Bloomberg suggested the UK is considering increasing defence spending to 3% of GDP by 2029—something that was largely expected, given the concessions needed to secure improved access to SAFE (Security Action for Europe) and more favourable EU trade terms. With no formal announcements likely before the Autumn Budget, investors appeared unbothered by any perceived fiscal implications. Gilt yields edged lower, with the 2yr down -0.7bps and the 10yr down -1.6bps. Elsewhere in fixed income, front-end European yields drifted slightly higher as renewed concerns over oil-driven inflation returned. The 2yr bund was up +0.2bps, while moves along the curve were more uneven, leaving the 10yr bund marginally lower at -0.1bps. Oil prices rose as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East resurfaced, including reports that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard had begun military exercises in the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude moved higher on the headlines, adding +1.33% yesterday. However it's down around -0.6% this morning. Markets will keep a close eye on developments as US–Iran talks are scheduled to resume today. Despite the renewed tensions, gold prices slipped yesterday, falling -0.74%. It is another -2% lower this morning with silver over -3% down, now trading $7 below its real adjusted price in 1790! Looking to the day ahead, data releases include the US February Empire Manufacturing Index, the NAHB Housing Market Index, UK December average weekly earnings and unemployment, Germany’s February ZEW survey, the Eurozone ZEW survey, and Canada’s January CPI. Fed speakers include Barr and Daly, while today’s notable earnings releases feature Medtronic and Cadence Design Systems. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 08:39 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/futures-fall-ai-selloff-resumes
Ayatollah To Trump: US Warships Can Be Sent "To Bottom Of The Sea" As 2nd Round Of Talks End Ayatollah To Trump: US Warships Can Be Sent "To Bottom Of The Sea" As 2nd Round Of Talks End The second round of indirect negotiations between the United States and Iran concluded in Geneva, Iran's semi-official Students' News Agency (ISNA) reported Tuesady. Delegations from both sides left the venue following the talks, however, the Iranian side says it's ready to stay in Switzerland for days or even weeks if needed, in order to reach a deal and stave off military attack by Washington. US envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner represented the US side in the talks, with Trump having told reporters aboard Air Force One that he would "indirectly" participate. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is leading the Iranian side. image Iran has insisted on its nuclear program being the sole focus of discussions, and not limitations on its ballistic missile arsenal (as the US and Israel are demanding) - and this holds of the possibility of derailing talks before they get further underway. In the meantime the temperature is rising in the Gulf region, after Iran's military announced Tuesday that sections of the Strait of Hormuz would be closed for several hours for what it called "security measures". This comes on the second day of IRGC naval drills, which semi-official Fars news agency described as designed to ensure the safety of maritime traffic during a military exercise. Iranian authorities stated the move formed part of the broader drill launched the day earlier. Oil Prices Rise as Iran Closes Parts of the Strait of Hormuz for Naval Drills: image Iran's state broadcaster reported that the "main phase' of a naval exercise conducted by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps began Tuesday. Iran tested large missiles in the Persian Gulf on Tuesday, footage shows: ⚡️BREAKING The Iranian Revolutionary Guards fired Anti-Ship Missiles into the Strait of Hormuz Parts of the Strait are now closed for military activity — Iran Observer (@IranObserver0) Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has warned in a speech before an event Tuesday (and afterward his office posted it to X), the : The Americans constantly say that they’ve sent a warship toward Iran. Of course, a warship is a dangerous piece of military hardware. However, more dangerous than that warship is the weapon that can send that warship to the bottom of the sea. This 'counter-threat' and warning was in response to remarks by Trump in which the president said the United States had not been able to destroy the Islamic Republic. "In one of his recent speeches, the US president said that for 47 years America has not succeeded in destroying the Islamic Republic... I tell you: you will not succeed either," Khamenei said. USS Gerald R. Ford now just days away from Mideast waters and entering the eastern Mediterranean... NEW — 🇺🇸 The U.S. aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford has entered the Strait of Gibraltar and is now heading toward the Mediterranean Sea. — UK Report (@UK_REPT) Trump has also threatened Iran with "traumatic" consequences and has raised the possibility of imposing regime change amid his ratcheting rhetoric, and the deployment of no less than two aircraft carrier groups to regional waters. "What is not on the table: submission before threats," Iran FM Araghchi said in a post on Monday, stating that he was in Switzerland "with real ideas to achieve a fair and equitable deal." Tue, 02/17/2026 - 08:20 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ayatollah-trump-us-warships-can-be-sent-bottom-sea-2nd-round-talks-end
BHP's Copper Pivot Pays Off With Surprise Dividend Bump, Record-High Stock Price BHP's Copper Pivot Pays Off With Surprise Dividend Bump, Record-High Stock Price Shares of BHP Group, the world's largest miner, jumped to a record high in Australia after it posted earnings at the top end of Wall Street expectations. The miner's pivot into copper, aided by a surging rally in industrial metals, offset softer conditions in its iron ore unit. BHP chief executive Mike Henry reaffirmed to investors earlier on a call that the miner is pivoting toward "future-facing" metals. In other words, he explained that the world's largest miner's shift away from operations focused on serving China's steel mills has paid off, as copper has soared. Henry said that acquisitions began to bear fruit, as did the improvements at Escondida, the world's largest mine, all of which were helped by a record surge in the price of the industrial metal used heavily for power grids and AI-related applications.  "This is the result of our deliberate actions to grow our copper business," Henry told analysts, adding, "Now, BHP is, by design, a diversified miner rather than focused on a single commodity." At the time of writing, iron ore futures on the Dalian Commodity Exchange were trading at depressed levels below $100 per ton, while copper on the London Metal Exchange was trading around $12,850 per ton. BHP earnings highlights: Underlying attributable profit rose 22% to $6.2 billion for the six months to end December. Shares in Australia jumped as much as 7.6% to a record. Copper contributed more than half of the profit for the first time, motly because of higher copper prices and steady output. Copper division underlying EBITDA climbed 59% to $8 billion. Iron ore earnings edged 4% higher and still make up close to half of the total, though BHP is dealing with "tough" negotiations with China's state buyer, China Mineral Resources Group. The Jansen potash project in Canada remains on track for first production in the middle of next year, though first-phase capex has risen to $8.4 billion. On M&A: Recent gains include the 2023 purchase of OZ Minerals and the Vicuna joint venture with Lundin Mining. Attempts to buy Anglo American (and efforts around its tie-up with Teck Resources) were unsuccessful, so BHP is emphasizing organic growth and being more disciplined in deal-making. Reiterated its plan to unlock up to $10 billion through asset sales and other transactions. It announced a $4.3 billion long-term silver streaming agreement with Wheaton Precious Metals tied to byproduct silver from the Antamina mine in Peru (BHP owns 33.75%). It also recently sold a $2 billion stake in the power network supporting Pilbara operations. Declared an interim dividend set at 73 cents, equal to a 60% payout ratio UBS analyst Dominic Ellis commented on BHP's earnings, indicating "BHP Surprises With Dividend Bump." Ellis told clients: BHP's EBITDA beat by 3% in the first half of its financial year while EPS beat by 4%, but the surprise was the 16% increase in the dividend, on a 60% payout versus the baseline of 50%. Net debt stood at $14.7 bn, at the midpoint of the guided range, capex in line and guidance unchanged. Group EBITDA from copper was 51%, more than half of EBITDA for the first time. The stock has been a funding short for specialists, and while shares are performing well on these resutls, feedback from clients recently has been on the disconnect between iron ore (down sharply, now below $100/t) and iron ore equity resilience. BHP's spot free cash flow yield is 3.5% this year versus Rio Tinto on 6.4%. Reminder about the copper market: https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/coppers-breakout-built-much-more-fundamentals https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/copper-hits-record-high-goldman-warns-circular-melt-now-driving-global-market Strong earnings and a copper-led pivot that's cushioning a softer iron ore business have rewarded shareholders with record-high share prices in Australia. image "In the last five years, the BHP CEO has set the business up with options," said Glyn Lawcock, head of metals and mining research at Barrenjoey Markets Pty in Sydney. "Clearly, growth to 2030 is really potash and iron ore, but you hit the start of the new decade, it's pretty much all copper." Tue, 02/17/2026 - 07:45 https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/bhps-copper-pivot-pays-surprise-dividend-bump-record-high-stock-price
Italy Beckons The Rich: How Flat Taxes And Lifestyle Are Luring Global Millionaires Italy Beckons The Rich: How Flat Taxes And Lifestyle Are Luring Global Millionaires Submitted by Thomas Kolbe Think of Italy, and wanderlust awakens immediately. Last year, over 140 million visitors experienced the beauty of the Amalfi Coast, enjoyed time at Lake Garda, in South Tyrol, Tuscany, or on the beaches of Sicily. Italy is a land of dreams with a rich cultural history, attracting those who want to experience the dolce vita in its finest form. image Italy is also a country that has drawn wealthy individuals from around the world for years. Last year alone, more than 3,600 high-net-worth individuals chose Italy as their new residence. They brought an estimated €21 billion in wealth with them – at least for tax purposes, as their investments or company holdings are usually spread across multiple countries. What drives these wealthy newcomers may be Italian cuisine and the excellent weather, but above all, hard facts matter. Italy offers a special tax regime for the wealthy in the form of a flat tax. Incoming expats can either opt for standard , under which wealthy newcomers previously paid a flat annual tax of €200,000 on all foreign income. The CR7 rule, named after footballer Cristiano Ronaldo, whose now-iconic jersey bears the number seven, targets a specific class of taxpayers whose main sources of income lie abroad. It generally applies for up to 15 years and covers earnings from capital investments, image rights, licenses, foreign real estate, capital gains, or foreign inheritances. Income from Italian domestic sources – in Ronaldo’s case, the salary from Juventus or revenues from Italian property – remains subject to standard Italian taxation. Ronaldo used this model after moving to Juve, allowing his billion-dollar wealth, largely invested abroad, to work tax-efficiently. Italy has thus created a selective tax system designed to open doors for the global wealthy to settle in Italy, potentially establish business roots, and, later – even in the next generation – return to the regular tax system as integrated Italian citizens. For the Italian treasury, this is a profitable arrangement. Adding ordinary consumption taxes and other routine levies, the state is estimated to have gained around €1 billion in extra revenue last year from the influx alone – without further effort. New businesses and investments from these wealthy newcomers also potentially create jobs and contribute to their local communities. The broader tax framework is also appealing. Corporate and capital gains taxes in Italy are on average about two percent lower than in Germany. Inheritance taxation, for example, is significantly lower than in the UK, which now levies 40 percent on inheritances above £325,000, triggering an exodus of wealthy citizens. Unsurprisingly, this preferential taxation has sparked criticism among Italians. The government of Giorgia Meloni responded by from €100,000 to €200,000, and as of the start of this year, to €300,000. A flat fee of €50,000 per family member is also due. The goal seems to be defusing opposition without undermining the incentives. Italy’s fiscal situation practically forces this approach. With public debt at roughly 135 percent of GDP, the country is cornered. Tough budget cuts accompany the government’s tax initiatives – and early results are visible. This year, the budget deficit is expected to shrink to 2.5–2.8 percent of GDP – a notable achievement, considering other EU heavyweights like Germany and France report deficits of five to six percent. The bond market has also responded positively. Yields on ten-year Italian government bonds have dropped from about 5 percent three years ago to roughly 3.5 percent today. The gap to German bonds – the so-called spread – is narrowing, signaling that markets view Italy’s fiscal climate as far more stable than just a few years ago, while conditions in Germany are increasingly perceived as critical. In Rome, officials are watching Germany’s tax debates closely, where signs are emerging that Berlin might follow Norway’s 2022 example and levy a special wealth tax on the rich. The Social Democrats, together with the united Left, are pushing for higher inheritance taxes on corporate wealth and the debated reintroduction of a wealth tax, driving their coalition partners forward. The political climate is favorable, and the Union parties appear resigned to the left’s dominance, likely to support these measures despite the precarious state of social security. The mechanism is simple: spark a resentment-driven debate, activate the already abundant public envy, and target the wealthy. This alleviates political pressure – both on migration and on overdue welfare reforms – from the shoulders of those in charge. Economists at the German Institute for Economic Research recently added fuel to the debate. With progressive rates of up to 12 percent for billionaires, Germany could generate roughly €150 billion in extra annual revenue. Yet envy debates increasingly replace rational policy. This capital is not idle; it funds productive investments, company holdings, job creation, and technological advancement. In its struggle for survival, Germany – and apparently a majority of its citizens – seems willing to consume its own productive base rather than endure a period of tough reforms and sacrifice, emerging stronger with a healthier economic foundation. It is a fatal path, historically a civilizational rupture: for a limited time, the strong state stands at the end of a rapidly bleeding middle class, whose economic assets melt like ice in the sun. A societal climate of envy and impoverishment is the inevitable result. South of the Alps, one can already anticipate a surge in German millionaires relocating. Germany’s political climate is increasingly hostile to enterprise and performance. And as noted, life in Tuscany or the picturesque coastal towns of Italy offers compelling reasons to leave Germany behind. Put simply: nowhere in Italy is it as bad as in Berlin. * * *  About the author: Thomas Kolbe, a German graduate economist, has worked for over 25 years as a journalist and media producer for clients from various industries and business associations. As a publicist, he focuses on economic processes and observes geopolitical events from the perspective of the capital markets. His publications follow a philosophy that focuses on the individual and their right to self-determination. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 07:20 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/italy-beckons-rich-how-flat-taxes-and-lifestyle-are-luring-global-millionaires
In Defense Of Sir Jim Ratcliffe In Defense Of Sir Jim Ratcliffe Far more energy has gone into condemning his phrasing than confronting the questions he raised... image Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s statement that Britain has been “colonised by immigrants” has sparked a fierce reaction. From Starmer to Bluesky, to the Athletic and all the football social media pundits in between, the co-owner of  Manchester United has been bombarded with the same attack lines repeatedly. He has been called a tax dodging, racist immigrant hypocrite. Such an uproar has flared up in such a short space of time because Ratcliffe is radically different from those who have issued similar statements before. Ratcliffe is not a political figure: you do not see billionaires nor football club owners voicing discontent like this. The pushback has been fierce because Ratcliffe has no political incentive to say any of this. He isn’t running for office, seeking favour, or chasing votes — which makes his intervention harder to dismiss. Part of the backlash, too, reflects an unease that his diagnosis may be accurate. The remarks came from an initial conversation regarding the economic challenges Britain faces in general, not solely on immigration. The snippet that has been so widely shared is merely part of a wider statement of the economic problems Britain faces; Ratcliffe refers to the issues of “immigration” and “nine million people” on benefits simultaneously. Manchester United part-owner has told the UK has been "colonised" by immigrants, who are draining resources from the state, as he warns of the country facing profound political, social and economic challenges. 🔗 — Sky News (@SkyNews) Colonised is a strong opening salvo for a figure such as Ratcliffe, who is not known for any previous anti-migration stance. This generated responses of tone policing from his critics – cries that his choice of words were “disgraceful and deeply divisive” and that “this language and leadership has no place in English football” from Kick It Out, a notable “Anti Racism” football pressure group. There was no attempt to argue or debate: this was no more than tone policing, of “mate mate mate, you can’t say that mate”. It did not engage with the substantive point. It was not an argument. The Prime Minister has pushed for Ratcliffe to apologise. Less than a year ago, Starmer was referring to Britain as an ”Island of Strangers”; he has little argument here. Sir Ed Davey has stated that Ratcliffe is “totally wrong” and is “out of step with British Values”. Once again this is weak tone policing, not an argument. Regardless, which British values are being violated in particular? What are British values precisely meant to mean here? The fact is that Ratcliffe’s vocabulary choice is nowhere near as divisive as the impacts of mass migration in the last quarter century. Mass migration is the most important issue in British political debate. It has bought sectarianism, Bengali and Palestinian politics swinging both local council and Parliamentary elections, a deepening of housing crisis, the rape and murder of British women from taxpayer funded hotels and programs which bloat the welfare state even further. It is undeniable mass migration has defined British politics of the 2010s onwards. It has been much more harmful and divisive than any comment made by Sir Jim Ratcliffe. His words are nothing compared to the actions of Deng Chol Majek, or Hedash Kebatu, to name a couple of examples. Critics have also cried that Ratcliffe is “an immigrant himself, dodging tax in Monaco”. The difference between Ratcliffe and migration into Britain is so different they are almost incomparable. In the 2017/18 tax year Ratcliffe was the fifth highest taxpayer in the country, footing a bill of £110.5 million. With such an extraordinarily high bill, it is no wonder that he has since moved to Monaco. Meanwhile, the average salary of of a migrant entering Britain in 2023 (which has fallen by £10,000 since 2021) was £32,946, according to a report by the Centre for Migration Control. From this we can estimate a migrant would pay about £5,000 in income tax. That means it would take over 22,000 (statistically average) migrants to foot the tax bill that Ratcliffe paid in one year alone. Ratcliffe has been an exceptional cash cow to the British state. He has been taxed incredible amounts and contributed more to this country than almost anyone currently living; to call him hypocritical since he dared to criticise migration and its impact on the welfare state is simply not fair. Census data from the ONS in 2021 shows that migrants from four nations – Somalia, Nigeria, Jamaica and Bangladesh – head over 104,000 social homes in London alone. With such incredible numbers of subsidised housing going to foreign born nationals, it is absolutely correct to state that mass migration is costing the British economy a fortune. The same census states that over 70% of Somali born households are in social housing in England and Wales, whilst also being of lowest contributors to income tax in the nation – paying well under the £5,000 stated per head previously. The increase and sheer scale of benefit reliance for many immigrants in Britain is not sustainable, and it is a problem that is right to be addressed. Perhaps the most nonsensical argument presented by some is that as co-owner of Manchester United he employs a significant number of immigrant players. Bruno Fernandes is not living in social housing in Wythenshawe. Benjamin Sesko is not in a single bed council flat in Hulme. When he arrived in Manchester last year, the first thing Senne Lammens did was not register for Universal Credit. Not a single foreign player is a drain on the state. They are, as elite athletes in the most lucrative league in the world, very clearly exceptions to the norm of British migration. The difference between Bruno Fernandes, who earns a reported £300,000 a week, and the over 40% of Bangladeshi immigrants who are economically inactive should really not need spelling out. We are referring to just 17 foreign senior team players who all earn more in a week than the average migrant – or Brit – will earn in a year. It is ludicrous  to even attempt to compare the two. Regardless, employing or working with immigrants does not mean you waive your right to criticise the state of affairs in Britain. As an Englishman, Sir Jim Ratcliffe has a given and inalienable right to comment on the affairs of his country. Ratcliffe’s critics have entirely focused on his choice of the word “colonised”, and how they consider it inflammatory. This choice of phrase was not entirely accurate or intentional by Ratcliffe – proved by the fact he issued an apology over his “choice of language”, rather than the substance and argument behind his critique of the broader economic challenge of Britain. The bottom line is, Ratcliffe was right to raise a perfectly reasonable concern. He is directionally correct, and close enough to the truth that the obsessive focus around his phrasing is both absurd and clearly no more than a tactic to dodge the substance of his argument entirely. His critics have been intentionally evasive around the underlying subject: it is a harsh, necessary truth they have no reply too. They avoid the debate because, despite his wording being wrong, Ratcliffe is right. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 06:30 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/defense-sir-jim-ratcliffe
Asians More Optimistic Than Most For Their Countries' Future Asians More Optimistic Than Most For Their Countries' Future A recent https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2026-01/What-Worries-the-World-December-2025_0.pdf  of 25,000 people across 30 countries shows Asians are on average more optimistic for the future of their countries than people from the rest of the world. image When asked whether they believe things in their country are headed in the right direction or off on the wrong track, 82 percent of respondents in   said they think the city-state is on the right path, the highest percentage of all the countries included in the survey. In second position came Indonesia, where three quarter of respondents felt their country was headed in the right direction, followed by Malaysia (69 percent), India (62 percent) and South Korea (58 percent). The first non-Asian country, Argentina, came in sixth position with 57 percent. all the Asian countries included in the survey scored higher than the 30-country average, which stood at 41 percent. You will find more infographics at Amongst the least optimistic countries were France (10 percent), Peru (21 percent), Hungary (24 percent) and Great Britain (24 percent). The survey, which focused on what worries people around the world, found that the most common worries across all 30 countries were crime and violence (mentioned by 32 percent of respondents), inflation (30 percent) and poverty and social inequalities/unemployment (both 28 percent). Ipsos notes that severe flooding caused by Cyclone Ditwah in parts of Southeast Asia led to increased level of worry about climate change in the region. Thailand's level of concern about climate change now stands at 26 percent, 11 percentage points higher than the year before. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 05:45 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/asians-more-optimistic-most-their-countries-future
Visualizing The World's Countries By Political System Visualizing The World's Countries By Political System Nearly three-quarters of the world’s population now lives under autocratic rule, according to the https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf  Regimes of the World report. That’s the highest share since 1978. The map below, classifies every country into one of four political systems: closed autocracy, electoral autocracy, electoral democracy, or liberal democracy. image The results point to a decades-long shift in global governance, with electoral autocracies now the most common regime type worldwide. The Four Types of Political Regimes -Dem classifies countries based on the competitiveness of elections, protection of civil liberties, and the strength of institutional checks and balances. Here’s how the four categories differ: Closed autocracies have no meaningful multiparty elections and suppress core democratic freedoms. Countries like China, Saudi Arabia, and North Korea fall into this group. Electoral autocracies hold multiparty elections, but they are not free or fair. Media restrictions, weakened opposition, and limited civil liberties are common. This category includes countries such as Russia, India, and Turkey. Electoral democracies conduct free and fair elections and protect basic rights, but may lack strong institutional constraints. Examples include Argentina, Poland, and the United Kingdom. Liberal democracies go further, combining competitive elections with robust rule of law and checks and balances. Countries such as Germany, Japan, United States, and Uruguay are classified in this highest tier. Scroll down to see how every country is classified. Autocracy Is the Most Common Regime Electoral autocracy is now the most common regime type in the world. This category spans every continent, from Sub-Saharan Africa to South Asia and parts of Latin America. In many cases, democratic institutions still exist on paper, but their independence has eroded. Large-population countries shifting toward electoral autocracy have an outsized effect on global trends. As a result, even if the number of democracies remains substantial, the share of people living under autocratic rule continues to grow. CountryRegime 🇦🇫 AfghanistanClosed Autocracy 🇦🇱 AlbaniaElectoral Autocracy 🇩🇿 AlgeriaElectoral Autocracy 🇦🇴 AngolaElectoral Autocracy 🇦🇷 ArgentinaElectoral Democracy 🇦🇲 ArmeniaElectoral Democracy 🇦🇺 AustraliaLiberal Democracy 🇦🇹 AustriaElectoral Democracy 🇦🇿 AzerbaijanClosed Autocracy 🇧🇩 BangladeshElectoral Autocracy 🇧🇧 BarbadosLiberal Democracy 🇧🇾 BelarusClosed Autocracy 🇧🇪 BelgiumLiberal Democracy 🇧🇯 BeninElectoral Autocracy 🇧🇹 BhutanElectoral Democracy 🇧🇴 BoliviaElectoral Democracy 🇧🇼 BotswanaElectoral Democracy 🇧🇷 BrazilElectoral Democracy 🇧🇳 BruneiClosed Autocracy 🇧🇬 BulgariaElectoral Democracy 🇧🇫 Burkina FasoElectoral Autocracy 🇧🇮 BurundiClosed Autocracy 🇰🇭 CambodiaElectoral Autocracy 🇨🇲 CameroonElectoral Autocracy 🇨🇦 CanadaElectoral Democracy 🇨🇻 Cape VerdeElectoral Democracy 🇨🇫 Central African RepublicElectoral Autocracy 🇹🇩 ChadElectoral Autocracy 🇨🇱 ChileLiberal Democracy 🇨🇳 ChinaClosed Autocracy 🇨🇴 ColombiaElectoral Democracy 🇰🇲 ComorosElectoral Autocracy 🇨🇬 Congo (Brazzaville)Electoral Autocracy 🇨🇷 Costa RicaLiberal Democracy 🇨🇮 Côte d’IvoireElectoral Autocracy 🇭🇷 CroatiaElectoral Democracy 🇨🇺 CubaClosed Autocracy 🇨🇾 CyprusElectoral Democracy 🇨🇿 CzechiaLiberal Democracy 🇩🇰 DenmarkLiberal Democracy 🇩🇴 Dominican RepublicElectoral Democracy 🇪🇨 EcuadorElectoral Democracy 🇪🇬 EgyptElectoral Autocracy 🇸🇻 El SalvadorElectoral Autocracy 🇪🇷 EritreaClosed Autocracy 🇪🇪 EstoniaLiberal Democracy 🇸🇿 EswatiniElectoral Autocracy 🇪🇹 EthiopiaElectoral Autocracy 🇫🇮 FinlandLiberal Democracy 🇫🇷 FranceLiberal Democracy 🇬🇦 GabonElectoral Autocracy 🇬🇲 GambiaElectoral Democracy 🇬🇪 GeorgiaElectoral Autocracy 🇩🇪 GermanyLiberal Democracy 🇬🇭 GhanaElectoral Democracy 🇬🇷 GreeceElectoral Democracy 🇬🇹 GuatemalaElectoral Democracy 🇬🇾 GuyanaElectoral Autocracy 🇭🇹 HaitiClosed Autocracy 🇭🇳 HondurasElectoral Autocracy 🇭🇺 HungaryElectoral Autocracy 🇮🇸 IcelandLiberal Democracy 🇮🇳 IndiaElectoral Autocracy 🇮🇩 IndonesiaElectoral Autocracy 🇮🇷 IranClosed Autocracy 🇮🇪 IrelandLiberal Democracy 🇮🇱 IsraelElectoral Democracy 🇮🇹 ItalyLiberal Democracy 🇯🇲 JamaicaLiberal Democracy 🇯🇵 JapanLiberal Democracy 🇯🇴 JordanElectoral Autocracy 🇰🇿 KazakhstanClosed Autocracy 🇰🇪 KenyaElectoral Autocracy 🇽🇰 KosovoElectoral Democracy 🇰🇼 KuwaitElectoral Autocracy 🇱🇦 LaosClosed Autocracy 🇱🇻 LatviaLiberal Democracy 🇱🇧 LebanonElectoral Autocracy 🇱🇸 LesothoElectoral Democracy 🇱🇷 LiberiaElectoral Democracy 🇱🇾 LibyaClosed Autocracy 🇱🇹 LithuaniaElectoral Democracy 🇱🇺 LuxembourgLiberal Democracy 🇲🇬 MadagascarElectoral Autocracy 🇲🇼 MalawiElectoral Democracy 🇲🇾 MalaysiaElectoral Autocracy 🇲🇻 MaldivesElectoral Democracy 🇲🇹 MaltaElectoral Democracy 🇲🇷 MauritaniaElectoral Autocracy 🇲🇺 MauritiusElectoral Autocracy 🇲🇽 MexicoElectoral Autocracy 🇲🇳 MongoliaElectoral Autocracy 🇲🇪 MontenegroElectoral Democracy 🇲🇦 MoroccoElectoral Autocracy 🇲🇿 MozambiqueElectoral Autocracy 🇲🇲 MyanmarElectoral Autocracy 🇳🇵 NepalElectoral Democracy 🇳🇱 NetherlandsLiberal Democracy 🇳🇿 New ZealandLiberal Democracy 🇳🇮 NicaraguaElectoral Autocracy 🇳🇪 NigerElectoral Autocracy 🇳🇬 NigeriaElectoral Autocracy 🇰🇵 North KoreaClosed Autocracy 🇳🇴 NorwayLiberal Democracy 🇴🇲 OmanClosed Autocracy 🇵🇰 PakistanElectoral Autocracy 🇵🇦 PanamaElectoral Democracy 🇵🇾 ParaguayElectoral Democracy 🇵🇪 PeruElectoral Democracy 🇵🇱 PolandElectoral Democracy 🇵🇹 PortugalElectoral Democracy 🇶🇦 QatarClosed Autocracy 🇷🇴 RomaniaElectoral Democracy 🇷🇺 RussiaElectoral Autocracy 🇷🇼 RwandaElectoral Autocracy 🇸🇦 Saudi ArabiaClosed Autocracy 🇸🇳 SenegalElectoral Democracy 🇷🇸 SerbiaElectoral Autocracy 🇸🇨 SeychellesLiberal Democracy 🇸🇱 Sierra LeoneElectoral Autocracy 🇸🇬 SingaporeElectoral Autocracy 🇸🇰 SlovakiaElectoral Democracy 🇸🇮 SloveniaElectoral Democracy 🇸🇧 Solomon IslandsElectoral Democracy 🇸🇴 SomaliaElectoral Autocracy 🇿🇦 South AfricaLiberal Democracy 🇸🇸 South SudanClosed Autocracy 🇪🇸 SpainLiberal Democracy 🇱🇰 Sri LankaElectoral Democracy 🇸🇩 SudanClosed Autocracy 🇸🇷 SurinameElectoral Democracy 🇸🇪 SwedenLiberal Democracy 🇨🇭 SwitzerlandLiberal Democracy 🇸🇾 SyriaClosed Autocracy 🇹🇼 TaiwanLiberal Democracy 🇹🇯 TajikistanClosed Autocracy 🇹🇿 TanzaniaElectoral Autocracy 🇹🇭 ThailandElectoral Autocracy 🇹🇬 TogoElectoral Autocracy 🇹🇹 Trinidad and TobagoElectoral Democracy 🇹🇳 TunisiaElectoral Autocracy 🇹🇷 TurkeyElectoral Autocracy 🇹🇲 TurkmenistanClosed Autocracy 🇺🇬 UgandaElectoral Autocracy 🇦🇪 United Arab EmiratesClosed Autocracy 🇬🇧 United KingdomElectoral Democracy 🇺🇸 United StatesLiberal Democracy 🇺🇾 UruguayLiberal Democracy 🇺🇿 UzbekistanClosed Autocracy 🇻🇺 VanuatuElectoral Democracy 🇻🇪 VenezuelaElectoral Autocracy 🇻🇳 VietnamClosed Autocracy 🇾🇪 YemenClosed Autocracy 🇿🇲 ZambiaElectoral Autocracy 🇿🇼 ZimbabweElectoral Autocracy Where Liberal Democracy Persists Liberal democracies are concentrated in Western Europe, parts of East Asia, Oceania, and North America. Nordic countries such as Sweden, Norway, and Finland remain among the strongest performers. So do nations like Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and Taiwan. However, even among established democracies, concerns about polarization, declining  , and pressure on judicial independence have intensified in recent years. While democratic systems still govern many countries, the overall global trend shows autocratic systems expanding their reach in terms of population. Methodology The classifications are based on the V-Dem Institute’s 2024 Regimes of the World dataset, which evaluates countries across indicators including electoral integrity, civil liberties, judicial independence, and executive constraints. Countries are then grouped into one of four regime types to provide a simplified view of the global political landscape. If you enjoyed today’s post, check out   on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 04:15 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/visualizing-worlds-countries-political-system
Impoverishment Of Spaniards Is The Result Of Years Of Interventionist Policies Impoverishment Of Spaniards Is The Result Of Years Of Interventionist Policies Inflation, bloating GDP with public spending and immigration and hidden unemployment are the ingredients of the so-called “economic miracle” of the Sánchez administration. image Spain closes 2025 with the consumer price index ( ) rate above the euro area average and higher than all the large economies in Europe. Cumulative inflation, measured by CPI, during Sánchez’s term reached 24.8%. Housing and food have risen by almost twice as much as the headline CPI. The reality of Spain is that the loss of purchasing power and the impoverishment of Spaniards are the result of years of interventionist policies.  have soared by more than 38%, housing-related expenses (rent, utilities, maintenance) have risen by more than 30%, and food prices are up around 38%. The “real shopping basket” studies find increases of between 40% and 60% in basic products between 2019 and 2025, showing that inflation in essential goods has been far higher than the official average. Between 2019 and 2025, real   in Spain have fallen by 0.3%, according to CaixaBank, but the picture is much worse if we look at net real wages, which have fallen by more than double because the government refused to index taxes to inflation and has sharply increased the fiscal burden of families and businesses. GDP growth, productivity, and the statistical mirage Government propaganda claims that productivity and GDP per capita “grow” by using the pandemic collapse as the starting point of the series. In other words, because Spain fell more than anyone else, now it “grows.” The reality is very different. Labour productivity per occupied person, compared with the EU average, has fallen from 99.8% in 2018 to 97%. Bouncing back is not growing, and even less so when the government is bloating GDP with government spending and immigration.  A quarter of Spain’s net real GDP gain over 2019‑2025 is directly explained by higher public consumption, and more if you include EU‑funded public investment and subsidies classified under other items, according to CaixaBank Research. Furthermore, real GDP per capita is expected to grow by a mere 1.1% between 2017 and 2026, according to the  . The large increase in immigration disguises a weak productivity model inflated by debt and public spending. Spain’s socialist “growth” model, doped by immigration and public spending, leaves weaker productivity growth and stagnant GDP per capita This is where the statistical mirage of Spain’s alleged “superior” growth becomes evident: headline GDP is inflated by a strong increase in immigrant population, a ballooning public sector, and the injection of one-off EU funds, while GDP per capita and productivity stagnate or worsen. Spain’s socialist “growth” model, doped by immigration and public spending, leaves weaker productivity growth and stagnant GDP per capita, dependent on an annual net debt issuance of more than 50 billion euros. It is a recipe for ruin. In purchasing power standards, Spain’s GDP per capita was 91% of the EU‑27 average in 2019 and is now around 90%, thus still below its pre‑Covid relative position despite the “strong growth” propaganda. That implies an average annual real GDP per capita growth of only about 1.1–1.4% over 2019–2025. In other words, by 2025 https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-economic-surveys-spain-2025_abc5c435-en/full-report/sustaining-growth-and-achieving-fiscal-sustainability_ab211a46.html  had finally surpassed its 2019 real GDP per capita, but the net gain per person after six years is modest, disguised by a large increase in government spending and one-off EU funds, and much smaller than the headline cumulative GDP growth figures suggest. Hidden unemployment – another hallmark of the Sanchez government In 2021, with the labour market “reform,” it became mandatory to convert short-term and seasonal contracts into “discontinuous permanent” contracts. With this statistical regulatory change, people on this type of contract are not counted as unemployed even when they are not working, and also if they are receiving unemployment benefits. Thus, it is no surprise that in nine provinces there are more people receiving unemployment benefits than officially registered unemployed. Official labour office (SEPE) statistics show that in Almería, Huelva, Jaén, the Balearic Islands, Huesca, Teruel, Soria, Castellón, and Cáceres, the   coverage rate exceeds 100%, meaning there are more unemployment benefit recipients than officially unemployed. In January 2019, the number of jobseekers “with an employment relationship” was 280,389. In December 2025, the figure was 892,933, more than three times higher. This means that effective unemployment has hardly improved at all since 2019, and the real effective unemployment rate is around 13.6% compared with the 9.9% official figure. The activity rate has been stagnant at 59% since 2019, which is another example of a weak  . At the end of December 2025, the total number of people registered with SEPE seeking work stood at 3,854,911, which means there are 1,446,241 more people not working than the official “registered unemployment” figure. Thus, registered unemployment has fallen by 152,048, while real unemployment (the number of people registered with SEPE who are not working) would have increased by 50,609. The number of people not counted as unemployed in SEPE data in December reached 1,893,134 and represents 44% of the total number of registered job seekers. The number of inactive people receiving unemployment benefits increased in 2025 compared with 2024 by 64,175. A model based on propaganda, not reality Spain’s economic miracle is just a statistical mirage. Spain’s “superior” GDP growth is not due to each person producing more (down, -1.7% 4Q2019-4Q2025, as the working population grew by 12.5%, but GDP by only 10.6%), and the unemployment reduction is distorted by the record number of inactive workers not considered unemployed even if they get an unemployment subsidy. The number has tripled since 2019. Sánchez has implemented a model based on propaganda, not reality, sweeping real unemployment under the rug, doping GDP with debt, immigration, and European funds, and leaving a reality of worse net real wages and atrocious productivity. Spain may seem like an economic growth miracle in headlines, but details show a time bomb that will explode once the placebo effect of debt fades and immigration’s net negative impact on public accounts soars. Tue, 02/17/2026 - 03:30 https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/impoverishment-spaniards-result-years-interventionist-policies