Where did the signal_and_rage nostrich go? Miss them…
heidi-E
heidi@cashu.me
npub1a8jh...e2jz
Runner of Roads&Nodes | EEng/Dev/IT
I saw “Cocaine Bear” and now I can only think about someone dumping cocaine from a plane —and my bear eating it. ;(
An old swim coach used to say “Put it (the BS you are facing) in the water”….don’t hear that much these days. When you get BS dumped on you, moving it physically-helps.
Swim it out, run it out, paddle it out or even sit it out and touch grass (or pull a weed)
Boltring just arrived!! 

I would think a federal Space Force employee would have better SIM-swap protection than the average Joe. #loweryhack @Jameson Lopp ?
Can someone please give me the TLDNR on why everyone is talking about aliens and UFOs? Not afraid to ask…
New Linux privacy and security guide by Michael Brazell:
The Privacy, Security, & OSINT Show – Episode 304 – IntelTechniques Blog
If you haven’t already, Close your PayPal. View quoted note →
GM, use your power well. “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power,” - Abraham Lincoln
Knowbe4 (RIP Kevin Mitnick) has a really good slide deck/webinar on actual accuracy of biometrics and hacking biometrics
Hacking Biometrics: If You Thought Your Fingerprints Were Safe, Think Again!
In this thought-provoking webinar Roger A. Grimes shares how biometrics can work, how they can be used against you, and how you can best protect yo...
Iris scanning is not foolproof-will there someday be fake inflamed iris drops to combat it? “No biometric is foolproof. A 2009 research study showed that patients with acute iris inflammation (also known as iritis or anterior uveitis) caused current iris recognition systems to fail. A 2012 report from the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) showed that iris recognition technology used to identify an individual in a crowd was inaccurate 1 to 10% of the time. Quality problems were due to poor subject presentation (e.g., a closed eye, rotated iris or off-axis gaze), problems with the capture environment (such as motion or defocus blur, reflections due to excessive ambient lighting or broken LEDs), image processing or storage (such as image compression or corruption), and unusual characteristics inherent in the individual (such as an abnormal pupil shapes). The miss rates (or false negative error rates) for single irises ranged from 2.5% to 20% or higher.”
So will Twitter bros now be X-Men?
And CA is working to automate..to automate the errors… 
