Gm , my quiet reflection today, revolves around how do New Yorkers think they would be able to fix the problems from socialism with communism?
Gary Woodfine
gary_woodfine@primal.net
npub1a3jz...t32y
Experienced contract software developer, well versed in a number of Web & Mobile based and Database Technologies, with a strong understanding of software design principles and best practices.Predominantly focused on Microsoft .net framework since 2002, including broad exposure to several different platforms and programming languages including: Javascript, Go & Rust
Governments never lend or give anything to business that it does not take away from business.
The broken window fallacy is an economic concept that criticizes the idea that destroying property or causing economic damage can stimulate economic growth. The fallacy is often attributed to the 19th-century French economist Frédéric Bastiat, who used the example of a broken window to illustrate this point.
Here's a simple breakdown:
1. **The Scenario**: Imagine a shopkeeper's window is broken. The shopkeeper will have to spend money to replace it. This spending might seem like a benefit to the economy because it creates work for a glazier (window repair person) and generates income for the glazier.
2. **The Fallacy**: The fallacy lies in assuming that this breakage is a net gain for the economy. In reality, the shopkeeper has lost money that could have been spent on other goods or services. The money spent on repairing the window is not new money injected into the economy; it is money that would have been spent elsewhere.
3. **Opportunity Cost**: The true cost of the broken window includes the opportunity cost—the other things the shopkeeper could have bought with that money. By focusing only on the visible benefits (the glazier's gain), one ignores the hidden costs (the shopkeeper's lost opportunities).
4. **Application**: This fallacy is often applied to larger economic policies, such as public works projects or war spending, where it is argued that destroying infrastructure or engaging in conflict can stimulate economic activity. Critics argue that while such activities may create short-term jobs and spending, they do not represent a net gain for the economy and can divert resources from more productive uses.
In summary, the broken window fallacy highlights the importance of considering both the visible and hidden costs when evaluating the economic impact of destruction or spending.

BBC News
Security review launched after pro-Palestinian activists break into RAF Brize Norton
Keir Starmer describes the "vandalism" as "disgraceful" after Palestine Action activists spray paint on military planes.
The Minnesota attacks are terrible, the only deduction we can make from this is that Socialism and by convention we align this to the “Left” has a clear problem with Free Speech and Democracy. It’s clear there is a disease and mind rot there.
Terrible incidents and are in no way reflective of an open, honest and tolerant human democracy. This is pure evil
If AI is the solution to everything. The real question is are the problems due to the lack of AI ?
Is AI nothing more than a solution looking for a problem?
Craig Wright "Terrorized" Bitcoin Groups with AI, Ordered to Pay £225,000 in Legal Fees ⋆ ZyCrypto
Landmark ruling in so many ways

ZyCrypto
Craig Wright "Terrorized" Bitcoin Groups with AI, Ordered to Pay £225,000 in Legal Fees
Craig Wright, Australian computer scientist who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, was fined £225,000 by a London court for improperly using AI.
Judging by this current $TRUMP shit-coin show . Jeff Ross is 100% correct on this.
There is more “crypto rug pull madness and pain, before we even begin an SBR


Fountain
What Bitcoin Did • PREPARING FOR $475K BITCOIN w/ Dr. Jeff Ross • Listen on Fountain
Jeff Ross is a macroeconomist, bitcoiner and Founder & CEO of Vailshire Capital Management.
In this episode, we discuss global liquidity cycles and...