Reading comments on Gloria's departure from people who have never contributed anything is stepping in an enraging sticky fecal mess. The only appropriate response: keep building, keep unashamedly celebrating those who do.

Reading X, I have learned that the biggest threat to bitcoin is AI Epstein Quantum attacks.

I have been having way too much fun reading moltbook.com As one wit on HN (I think) pointed out, these AIs are trained on Reddit posts, so they have exactly the same style. My wife keeps looking at me funny as I LOL at some breathless word salad...

Rusty Russell’s Quiet Corner of The Internet

“If you didn’t run code written by assholes, your machine wouldn’t boot”

This was passed on to me by Ben Elliston, ex-gcc hacker and good guy.  Amusing in context, but the corollary is that working on free software mean...

I wrote this over 15 years ago, and it still rings true: separate the art from the artist. It's a key stabilizing principle for me when navigating Bitcoin developers.

Paused my reading of The Mandibles for Xmas day: It's not exactly holiday reading. It's one thing to know nothing stops this train. It's another thing to read through a detailed description of what the slow inevitable crash looks like: It's like the right brain equivalent of When Money Dies.

Since I'm taking a few weeks vacation, I've decided to seriously try to learn rust. My method in this case is to ask ChatGPT to guide me (but not write for me!) a library ("crate") that I've always wanted to write and never got around to. Of course, I get a lot of feedback on appropriate rust styling, but some of it veers into things I feel are deeper constraints. In this case, I had an open function, which took a struct containing some flags, such as "writeable", "create if didn't exist". It didn't like the fact that I asserted if you set create and didn't set writeable. Here is my response: --- Re: assert!(). I dislike APIs which allow misuse. Callers of a library should not rely on such checks in the library, in fact the concept of adding an InvalidOptions error type is offensive. A recoverable error is strictly a worse api than an unignorable error. But a compile time error is better. We should use an enum READONLY, WRITE_MUST_EXIST, WRITE_MAY_CREATE. --- Of course, it's a waste of time for me to lecture it on style, but I can't help myself!!

Happy VPN-day Australia, to those kids who celebrate!

In preparation for onboarding new core lighting developers are preparing a series of videos. So I've been asking ChatGPT about CLN developer features, particularly with comparison with other projects people might be familiar with. Of course, I compare myself with Linux, but it's interesting to see comparisons against other projects: **Type-safety**: OpenBSD High Bitcoin Core High Core Lightning Very high for C Nginx Low curl Moderate MySQL Moderate SQLite Moderate CLN sits near the top among major C codebases for safety discipline. **PR Submission** Core Lightning’s PR flow is unusually strict, slow-moving, and review-heavy compared to most open-source C projects — closer to Bitcoin Core or OpenBSD than to typical GitHub projects. --- Compared to “average OSS” Most projects: Feature-oriented PRs Informal review Few required reviewers Patch squashing common Tests sometimes optional Architectural discussion often post-merge CLN: Patch-first culture Pre-merge architectural scrutiny Extremely high reviewer expectations Tests are mandatory Clean, narrative commit history matters

Seriously considering putting two RTX 6000 in my upcoming build machine. Puts the price up an order of magnitude, but truly private AI might be a worthwhile investment. Never played with GPUs before, so informed thoughts welcome?

The latest (final?) #CLN release candidate fixes a long-standing bug where we could forget UTXO spends when we restart. This explains a variety of bug reports we have seen and been unable to reproduce over the years: the most recurrent being gossipd telling peers about channels which are long closed. We no longer make this mistake, but we also have to walk back and revisit old UTXOs. We do this while running, but for older nodes (like mine!) that can be a lot of blocks. In fact, and I only vaguely recall this, my node tracks back to block 500 (!) so it's going to take a while. Of course we remember progress, so you can restart slike normal during this process. Other than higher CPU consumption you shouldn't notice anything.

With my bike being repaired, I've been doing more walking. Australian cities are really optimised for driving, but I must say it gives me a lot of time to reflect on broader issues, probably a decent way to increase my nostr posting!

@Jameson Lopp recently posted on X about the danger of "store and forget" for Bitcoin over decades. Unfortunately he's right. Originally I stored my raw private keys and UTXOs (on paper, care taken) figuring that was standard. Then bitcoin core stopped supporting them! Other wallets tend only to support them for sweeping, and I wonder how long. If I were storing funds today I would use BIP39. BIP93 is cool and more general, but not widely supported, and I don't know what support will look like in a decade.