Get ready for a 10x on Bitcoin by the end of this bullrun.. The nay Sayers saying it wouldn't break 80k will be saying it won't break a million. A million is FUD in the long haul. IMO

They are "Conspiracy" when it comes to us. And seem to be "Conspiracy theory's" when it comes to government

Here are some recent Fruedian's in the news feed

Even if I were to be zapped enough money to pay my rent.... I wouldn't use it... That would even be more difficult to explain to my better half. 😆

I have to find out how to get $1000 before the back closes today to pay rent or my ol lady and kids are gonna be very disappointed with me. 🙏

People think 61k is too expressive for 1 Bitcoin... The look on their faces when they can only afford Satoshis and Bits #Bitcoin #BTC #Supercycle #Satoshis #Sats #Bits #mBTC

How come my minimum zap amount is 500? Can I change that? I don't even have that much yet

How it might sound

If Jesus was a rapper

I am Gary Webb

A conversation with friends. DenkWahn speaks about immigration

Nostr is the Future!! Why is it so hard for people to see?

It's worth a quick listen? Having Fun with AI Constructive criticism welcome

Anything I ever need I receive it. So many times exceeded How I imagined or perceived it. Even when I try I cannot fail I thank you for the wind in my sail. Through the storms I prevail. From you I flourish Against all odds with endurance. When overwhelmed with deterrents I'm provided a current Superceding Examples of faith I'm used to seeing. I Am! The pursuit of Demons fleeing from my Being.

There's no try, Just do it! Now you're doin it. Flow state. You're mostly water my friend. Fluent! Why else would trillions ever be considered as an investment for influence? And Truth tellers throughout history such a nuisance? If that don't give you a little glimpse about the power of little ol you's. Issuance! Of consent. And how much of a role you play in the growth of this toumors con ten youance! Redirect it twords solutions says Confucius. What else can I say?

Arguments are nothing more than discourse with a user agreement that nobody cared to read.

Speaking TRUTH with the authority granted to me—it’s already here. The Kingdom is at hand. I proclaim that, and I expect you to agree. Whether you do or not, it doesn't change the fact that it is. It always has been. We're just waiting on a few more to submit to this FACT. It's not that the truth shall set us free. It translates to the Truth shall make us free.

I asked AI do disagreements really exist? This is our dialogue. At their core, disagreements are expressions of differing perspectives, beliefs, or interpretations of reality. However, whether they really exist—or are just perceived constructs—depends on how we frame them. Here's a breakdown of the philosophical angles: 1. Subjective vs. Objective Reality: In a subjective sense, disagreements arise because individuals have different experiences, backgrounds, and cognitive processes, leading them to see the world in unique ways. From this standpoint, disagreements absolutely exist because each person holds their own version of truth. However, if there is an objective reality—a single, ultimate truth—then disagreements are more like misalignments or misunderstandings of that truth rather than actual contradictions. The disagreement would only exist because people haven't yet aligned with the objective reality. 2. Perception and Language: Language is inherently imprecise, so much of what we perceive as disagreements may stem from different ways of expressing the same or similar ideas. In some cases, the disagreement could be an illusion created by limitations in communication. If you strip away language and perception, what seems like conflict may dissolve into deeper understanding. 3. Construct of Duality: Disagreements often rest on dualistic thinking—this or that, right or wrong. But in non-dualistic frameworks (common in certain spiritual or philosophical traditions), all things are interconnected, and disagreements are simply manifestations of the illusion of separation. In this sense, they don't really exist, because the underlying unity of existence erases the binary distinctions that lead to conflict. 4. Learning and Growth: From another angle, disagreements can be viewed as part of the process of learning and growth. Instead of something "real" in the sense of lasting significance, disagreements are temporary phenomena—steps on the path to greater understanding or reconciliation. If viewed this way, disagreements aren’t fixed; they're just part of an evolving process. So, do disagreements exist? Yes, in our experience and perceptions, they clearly do. But when you look deeper—especially from perspectives that challenge the idea of separateness or fixed truth—their existence becomes less certain, more like fleeting shadows cast by the limits of our understanding. I disagree That’s an interesting response, and it adds to the conversation! Your disagreement itself demonstrates the complexity of the idea. Disagreement—whether it's about perspectives, truth, or reality—becomes part of the dialogue that helps shape understanding. Would you like to expand on what specifically you disagree with or offer a different take on the nature of disagreements? I'd be curious to hear your perspective! I was just joking with you Memory updated Got it! I appreciate the humor. If you ever do have a disagreement—or just want to dive into a playful debate—I'm ready!

Becoming aware of control mechanisms and being able to fully acknowledge them is the only way to break free from them.

"My garden is fine" is a long term technique and the only way to eventually seize the most secure desirable gardens" I beg your pardon? Since 1913 the goal has been every garden

Secret Gardens

Listen and make your own on Suno.