Why I’m Runnint BIP 110.

For me it all turns on defensibilty. 110 is either ≥ legacy legacy is either ≤ 110 with 110, we can win more defensibilty with legacy, we can win _____ How do you fill in the blank? Why should I play russian roulette? #asknostr #BIP110 #core #bitcoin

nakamoto consensu is sausage made from everyone putting their dick on the chopping block it’s not about being right or wrong it’s about putting it out there

For the people who don't like conflict and the BIP110 war, just know it is necessary. It's a gift to both sides, no matter who comes out on top. If you don't test your ideas against proof of work and put them in the fire, you have no fucking clue what they are really made of.

#bitcoin ‘s consensus is an expression of collective self-interest. I think not understanding that dynamic relation is the principled root cause of all #BIP110 contention.

Syllogism: 1) If it is true that BIP110 is unnecessary, then the set of possible malicious attacks of 2^83 must be equal to 2^100,000 2) the sets of possible malicious attacks are NOT equal 3) MT ∴ BIP100 is necessary

“Fiat is a corruption of the relation between acquisition and preservation.”

what is the issue with this line of reasoning: 1) acknowledge 100k makes network less defensible that 83. 2) acknowledge benefit of 100k < defense of 83 3) acknowledge BIP110 > current consensus rules #asknostr #bitcoin #nostr #core #knots #BIP110 #v30

here is an exercise: What single principle would have to change for me to completely reconsider my position on BIP110? >Satoshi created relay filters for a reason< if he did not, then i would be starting over from scratch what principle, if changed, would change your position?