πŸ‘οΈβƒ€.sats / Hobo.sats's avatar
πŸ‘οΈβƒ€.sats / Hobo.sats
npub19459...khyy
Black Belt in Tae Bo Sub-optimized Bitcoin/Mining revolution/Mutualism I see the cat πŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ΄ OIF '04 / IVAW Husband/Dad 3d Graphics/Design
who here uses Microsoft LOOP ? it's a ms365 data blurb that makes it easy to share,collab over teams. kinda feels like magic (though the latency on my VPN isn't fun). but curious about what's happening on the back-end, and specifically, are these features that nostr notes could mimic?
okay my deal for real DJT. you can eliminate corporate income tax... but you also gotta state clearly that corporations are not people, they aren't stakeholders in our govt, we cannot protect their IP abroad, we don't owe them special consideration, and they don't deserve representation or the right to lobby.. does he take it or leave it?
it's crazy how these Tesla's are so easily targeted because they're basically rolling surveillance bots but these dweebs are also so easily caught because they're rolling surveillance bots.
my wife, 2018: "I can't believe you put everything into digital beanie babies! you're lucky I don't divorce you." same wife, 2025: "do you think now would be a good time to increase our Bitcoin buys? I think we should be stacking harder." guys, super-cycle confirmed πŸ’ͺ
if King Louis XVI cut bread checks to every French peasant, he probably would've kept his head, his crown, and his palace Versailles, but it wouldn't have produced a single extra loaf of bread.
we rightfully rail against the Fed. but as @Lyn Alden often points out, this period of money printing is fiscal rather than fed-driven. would we put the same energy into resisting a direct debt monetization, as existed in 1863, when the greenback was backed by nothing but 'in God we trust'? cause it looks to me like that's a direction djt could be moving towards; a direct monetization of t-bills on XRP & SOL (esp in light of Barron's recent tweet re the Fed, which I mostly agree with). image
the NSA's budget is so high, it's classified. backdooring is expensive work. it'd be much more 'efficient' if they could simply come thru the front door. doge could save billions by axing the fifth amendment. DoD spend billions on housing soldiers. completely redundant. doge could save billions by axing the fourth amendment. 3 Independent branches? ax that and make a king. much more efficient. guys, we literally won a revolution to overthrow 'efficient' government and replace it with a limited government. Trump has threatened the sovereignty of Canada, Greenland, and Gaza. he is not for limited government. he's for consolidating power. the problem isn't efficiency. it's 200+ years of the subversion of the limits WE originally placed on government. a more efficient government that still does not respect those limits is free to encroach further.
been thinking about Jacques Ellul and The Technological Society and I have a #nostr philosophy question... he describes technique as the totality of methods rationally arrived at and having absolute efficiency, and that the focus on efficiency creates a closed system that perpetuates itself, making it difficult for humanity to break free. privacy, permissionlessness, and redundancy are often the enemy of efficiency. when is it appropriate to sacrifice one of these for efficiency? in your opinion? image
↑