No matter if I'm winner or loser by high standards of alpha normies, or civilization is going to shit or not. I do or not do what I love in best way possible.

Creative rest.

By "gravity-from-entropy principle" I mean general principle of decreasing entropy per larger scale by offsetting increase in entropy to outside. However, smaller scales still continue increase in entropy which is what drives complexity (adding new plot twists, items etc. inside single story). View quoted note →

For me, the gravity-from-entropy principle is best observed on writing long fiction. Going from simple chaotic mini-stories which are bounded to sparse and simple 3D worlds, to stable linear narrative of alternative medieval fantasy with miniaturized main character in cartoon world across chapters. During writing the last, I was also adding new elements like major crisis, sea battles, Renaissance with custom computing and robotic device in alternative medieval fantasy. By the end, I'm still bored of the same setting, so I got an insight that I need some sort of happy ending or moral. And move entropy into more long or complex forms...

At least I post on Nostr once in few days after 3 months self-shutdown of social media. View quoted note →

I go to self-autarky until I rebuild meaning of custom software.

I wrote two chapters of "Dervish dreams"/"Tales of Phichoyani" and am setting up another p2p networking technology.

In my experience, most of problems during conversations arise due to different cultural biases: some are heavily attached for short-written notes for the sake of communicational efficiency or easy engagement, some start sensitive topics publicly and then are easily triggered by going from abstract to concrete things etc. So I've needed to write rules of my profile: 1. Purpose of the rules is to make constructive Operating System for conversation, not to make conversations formal and rigid. 2. I welcome diverse views and linguistic styles, except anti-humanist, depressive and distractive ones. 3. I prefer constructive dialogue. This means: - Write everything I/you need to reply in single message. Single fix of typos or words is okay in response to your own message. - First 4 comments of single thread are welcome for simple engagement and sharing experience and feelings. These comments include topic-starter comment. - In first 6 comments of single thread, discussion should progress towards recognition of specific problem. These comments include topic-starter comment. If specific problem is not recognized in these comments, I close discussion. - In first 8 comments of single thread, discussion should progress towards development of potential or actual solution(s) to the recognized problem. These comments include topic-starter comment. If potential or actual solution(s) are not developed in these comments, I close discussion. - If topic is sensitive for you, either do not start it publicly, or be ready to receive questions which go deeply into it for purposes of understanding. 4. If there is any misunderstanding in discussion, read my rules.

Today is creative rest.

Civilization starts with stability and culture. Even cannibalistic cavemen had technology.

Today I finished a chapter of "Tales of Phichoyani" (aka "Dervish dreams") which contains some technical description of computing device and doll in microscopic fantasy medievalistic world with many micro-economies, which are linked by flooded paving stones. This chapter follows a chapter with battle with archers from scam-profiteer cockroaches on the sea ^.^"

Gravity-from-entropy principle states that while entropy increases globally, this process is enhanced by local decrease in entropy (by gravity, life, intelligence etc.). Answering to why life feels so inefficient/inconsistent and unsatisfying most of times, I'm gonna apply this priciple in the sequence below (passive then active, excluding necessary breaks for physical needs): 1. Physical: - Passive: wake up, eat (1-1.5 hours) - Active: plan a day, exercise, walking (1-2 hours) 2. Entertaining/art: - Passive: read new book(s), listen to new music, watch new media (~1 hour) - Active: write a story/create a picture (~1 hour) 3. Logical/formal: - Passive: siesta + learning (2 hours) - Active: coding/tech-related-stuff (1-4 hours) 4. Social/relative: - Passive: read new post(s) - Active: engage in new post(s) 5. Integrative: summarize cross-disciplinary what you got today from previous stages. 6. Pure spontainety: pure random thoughts through sleep 7. The cycle repeats from 1. This follows historical developmental stages. But what if this could be replayed at smaller scale...

Programming/mathy/digital creative person about exercising be like:

I did read long fiction books, then experienced nostalgia about old funny and creepy memes, and then realized, how excess of postmodern thinking has been invisibly leading into depression, though this was initially masked by high social mobility and cheap goods. Long watching of latter confuses a lot, though they seem simpler, even though I used to hate to read long fiction because school demanded to read it a lot, without relatedness to your own taste, desire to seek novel patterns and create new patterns. Btw, also a product of postmodern gibberish, where "you need to find your own signals and integrate them for your own, but we burn out you to such an extent, when you won't have any motivation to find it yourself". For this reason, I criticized modern education system in teens. The good thing about postmodern I found, is that it rejects meta about passively waiting for miracle from big dude, the bad thing is that it does not develop meta skills, required to build your own taste, culture, tech etc.

Tried to vibe code a complex system with powerful model. Still needed to adjust manually each aspect from plan (most abstract) to code of modules (most concrete), because AI's latent space is stochastic gibberish, not a taste. Also privacy anxiety and poor computing power which makes adoption slower. #blog #thoughts #ai #vibecoding