KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS
skater@goskatespots.nostr1.com
npub1e2ay...8a4l
Not a #Grantillionare DM: https://cordn.net/p/npub1e2ayjlmmaksx2rtt0z4jzyskunfwh2lwe89xav4qtnhgu4wxsudsp98a4l 2022 - 2024 BOB Space 2025 Sats N Facts 2026 building Skate Spots with #oktech
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater 16 mins ago
Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Unless, of course, there is a grant application involved. Privacy is not secrecy. It is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world. Preferably after completing KYC. We must ensure that each party to a transaction knows only what is necessary for that transaction. Unless that transaction is a grant. Then they need your name, passport, bank account, legal entity, tax status, deliverables, and quarterly impact report. Privacy requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. Today, we have improved upon it with KYC Bitcoin grants, institutional foundations, and compliant privacy infrastructure. We cannot expect governments or corporations to grant us privacy out of beneficence. But if they grant us money, we can apparently make an exception. Cypherpunks write code. Grantillionaires write grant proposals. They preach first principles, defend decentralization, and condemn fiat incentives — preferably while accepting fiat-funded grants and quietly exploring whatever shitcoin happens to be paying the bills. We deplore regulations on cryptography. We deplore KYC. We deplore financial surveillance. But most importantly, we deplore missing the next funding round. Our code is free for all to use, worldwide. Our principles, however, are subject to funding availability. For privacy to be widespread, people must come together and deploy these systems for the common good. And for funding to be widespread, people must come together and agree not to ask too many questions about where the money came from. We the Grantpunks seek your questions and concerns. Just not about the grant. Onward.
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater 2 hours ago
You have no idea how bad things can get.
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater 5 hours ago
Seems like monero could be next just sayin
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater 9 hours ago
Gm Bitcoin "Maxis" are the probably the main reason Bitcoin hasn't become mainstream yet they keep disservicing this industry. They are a bunch of *not-so-closet* corrupted shitcoiners at heart chasing regulatory capture, lobbies, perpetrating KYC, USD footlickers with a dearranged libertarian syndrome. Liquid is another sidechain comparable to ETH side chains or any other coin. Denying that means you are just a retor.
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater 10 hours ago
hackers have withdrawn ~4,000 BTC (~$320 million) 1- Sidechains do not scale 2- Another day another shitshow 3- Who wants enemies when you have wallets and protocols like these? image View quoted note →
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater 21 hours ago
The new Amethyst relay notifications are a bit confusing. No?
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater 23 hours ago
Who audits the fiat auditors auditing the audits?
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater yesterday
@erik I don't think you are working hard enough on your subsided cypherfart pet projects
KYCed Bitcoin n Nostr Dev backed by VC and a bit of BS's avatar
Skater yesterday
HIGHLIGHT One of the main reasons OpenSats and HRF are comfortable with KYC regime is the fact that they require a company or a shell company for them to issue Grants to their grantees. Unless circumstances play in their favor, they illegally use these entities to save on initial investment costs for VCs that they are also part of or that are backed by their friends. Another way they leverage this is by continuously providing grants to obviously non-profitable efforts, which then tend to become vassals of these same entities, as dependencies eventually become more than just political. Most become US tools with their missions gradually subverted. Exactly like Satoshi envisioned. (notice the irony) I'm not saying this is good or bad. I'll leave that judgment up to you. Today we have other options that favor open-protocols such as Angor, Grantless and other solutions with more transparency which tend to get ignored because they aren't loaded with western propaganda and tend to be more neutral and less arbitrary. On the other hand you have more noble yet centralized efforts led by VCs such as Fulgur (backed by Tether🤫) which is basically empowering a bunch of top engineers to provide parallel solutions with proper UI/UX to the market, sometimes they fail, sometimes they win but at least they keep neutrality like bitcoin itself. In a nutshell... Are you really free anon, do you have anything bad to say against your masters? I will start. I hate skateboarding sometimes and their gatekeepers have wrongly misled this one into a popularity competition (my opinion and only mine). Skateboarders can unlock much more value if they'd knew how to leverage technology on their favor and that's what unsuccessfully I am trying to do so far, with my money, no cock-sucking, using open-protocols and sometimes reminding this industry that has been slowly becoming as corrupted as what they promised they'd compete against. Some have decided to fight the cause within the system by chasing regulatory capture and else. Allow me to be cynical on those efforts and good luck. PS: written by a Western kid. @Gigi would you like to highlight any of this?